- Text smaller
- Text bigger
No agency in the Clinton administration, it seems, is immune from
forced “diversity” programs. Many in government view them as a way of
promoting affirmative action covertly following the backlash against
Now the CIA is getting into the act. We obtained a copy of CIA
Director George J. Tenet’s diversity program for all U.S. spy agencies:
“DCI Diversity Strategic Plan: A Functional Plan That Supports the DCI’s
Strategic Intent.” DCI stands for director of central intelligence.
The October 1999 plan is seven pages and never mentions the word
“merit” as a goal or condition for promotion. Mr. Tenet stated in a
cover letter to all intelligence officials that “This is not a matter of
political correctness.” Diversity, he said, is a “corporate imperative”
for being better spies. “I challenge each and every one of you to join
me in increasing and nurturing diversity within our ranks,” he said.
Here are some of the management policies:
- “Provide mandatory diversity and Equal Employment Opportunity
training for all selection board/panel members.”‘
- “Improve the representation of women and minorities at all
levels of the intelligence community to reflect the civilian labor
- “Promote and advance women and minorities at a rate at least
consistent with their representation in the relevant labor force.”
In a section on “management accountability,” the plan states
that goal 4.1 is: “Hold managers accountable for developing and
implementing a strategy for executing goals and objectives of the
Diversity Strategic Plan.”‘ It also states that under the plan it will
be policy to “Recognize and reward managers and employees who
demonstrate excellence in diversity management and education.”
The language has raised fears among some intelligence officials that
the statement is an implicit threat to punish managers who do not meet
CIA spokesman Bill Harlow angrily denied the diversity plan is a
stalking horse for quotas or political correctness. “It’s important for
intelligence agencies to have a diverse group of people working for
us,” he said. “We do, but we need to do it better.”
Mr. Tenet is proud of the diversity effort and “it goes without
saying we want excellent people,” Mr. Harlow said.
Navy Secretary Richard Danzig has narrowed to three the number of
four-star admirals competing to become the next chief of naval
operations (CNO) this summer.
The names have been submitted to Defense Secretary William S. Cohen,
who could make his choice any day now.
Sources say Adm. Tom Fargo, Pacific Fleet commander, has emerged as
the leading candidate.
Of the other two, Adm. Vernon Clark, Atlantic Fleet commander, is now
being eyed as the next head of Atlantic Command. The move would put him
in contention as the Navy’s best candidate for Joint Chiefs of Staff
The Atlantic Command is one of 14 posts that qualify the holder to
ascend to JCS chairman.
Adm. James Ellis, commander of NATO’s southern flank, is also in the
running for the CNO’s job. The current CNO, Adm. Jay Johnson, retires
Sources say the list of three might expand. The White House was
extremely impressed by Vice Adm. Robert Natter’s work to settle the
contentious Vieques bombing range debate. He spent the weekend at the
White House before the deal with Puerto Rico was announced Jan. 31. Adm.
Natter, deputy CNO for plans, policy and operations, then hurried to
Capitol Hill to sell the arrangement, whereby the Navy will maintain
limited training access to the island.
“He was the guy who made it happen,” said a Navy source.
Both the Navy and Air Force believe they have a good shot at getting
their candidate the JCS chairmanship, held by an Army general the past
Navy officials see Adm. Clark as their best candidate, followed by
Adm. Dennis Blair, now Pacific Command honcho.
A new name mentioned as a possible replacement for Gen. Henry H.
Shelton, current chairman whose term expires next year, is Gen. James
Jones, the Marine Corps commandant who has a strong following in
The unanswered question about the security breach committed by former
CIA Director John Deutch is what secrets did he leave on his home
computer. CIA sources tell us the classified data included details on
the CIA’s global covert action programs — political influence,
paramilitary and financial activities that are not totally secret but
“unacknowledged” by the U.S. government.
Mr. Deutch used his home computer to write presidential “findings,”
which state a covert action program is needed because “the president
finds that. …”
The main CIA covert action program under way today is the
not-so-secret effort to fund Iraqi opposition groups. The last major
CIA-backed semi-military operation in northern Iraq ended in disaster
when Iraqi troops drove north and scattered opposition groups that had
been trying to foment an uprising within the Iraqi military.
The Naval Academy in Annapolis has rescinded a policy that required
medical clinic personnel to disclose their race before being issued a
The original order had enraged some workers, who in turn received a
toughly worded e-mail from a master-at-arms.
“I’ve received numerous telephone calls this morning from both
military and civilian regarding the sheet which is to be filled out and
turned in to me for you to receive your USNA parking decal,” the
master-at-arms (MA) said in an “all-hands” Jan. 21 message that we
“These telephone calls are complaints about the requested information
on the sheet. For those of you who don’t understand that when an order
to complete a task has been given, it is to be done to the best of your
ability unless it endangers your life, and to those of you who would
like a full explanation on ‘why,’ here’s your answer.”
After explaining the race information was needed for
statistics-keeping, the MA added, “So now that you understand ‘why’ all
of the information is needed, please complete the form in its entirety
and submit it as ordered. If you do not wish to submit the form and
receive the USNA parking sticker, I will be knocking on your door!”
The Navy disavows the order.
“Any requirement for personal information, such as race and gender,
has been rescinded,” said Cmdr. Mike Brady, an academy spokesman.
Cmdr. Brady said the order was issued by “an individual on his own
initiative who was well intentioned. That individual has since been
counseled. … It wasn’t command sanctioned. It was just a guy trying to
do his job.”
Reagan as commander in chief
While President Clinton is selling historians on his legacy even
before he leaves office, Ronald Reagan has remained largely unseen by
Americans the past decade.
But, 11 years after he left the presidency, Mr. Reagan’s legacy is
being discussed in an increasing number of articles and public forums.
More and more historians are crediting his substantial military
modernization in the 1980s with putting immense economic pressure on the
Soviet Union, forcing it to adopt reforms that ultimately led to the
Now there’s a new take on Mr. Reagan’s military legacy from no less
than Mr. Clinton’s secretary of defense.
“We have been enjoying the fruits of a peace dividend, but it has
come at the cost of really relying upon what President Reagan did in the
early 80s as far as the buildup,” William S. Cohen told the Senate
Armed Services Committee this week. “We’ve been living off that, and now
we’re at the point where we’ve got to replace it.”