Gay liberationists in general, and boy-lovers in particular,
should know Kinsey’s work and hold it dear. … (I)mplicit in Kinsey is
the struggle we fight today. — North American Man/Boy Love Association
(NAMBLA) in “The Age Taboo,” (1981)

Question: Why would NAMBLA urge child molesters to hold
Kinsey’s data “dear”?

Answer: Kinsey’s fraudulent sexuality data justified sexual
abuse of children and “sex education” — like the recent conference when
Massachusetts teachers trained children in sodomy and “fisting.”

In “For Money or Love, Boy Prostitution in America,” which was
published in 1976, libertarian Robin Lloyd quotes former Sen. Birch
Bayh, D-Ind., stating that the growing traffic in boy prostitution is “a
hitherto undiscussed facet of the homosexual world.” Says Lloyd,
“Perhaps half of the million runaway boys in this country (aged 10 to
16) are peddling their bodies to ‘chicken hawks’ — older men who lust
for ‘chicken’ (boys).”

“There are tightly run organizations … geared to provide wealthy
clients with both pornography and boys. … (T)heir boys will entertain
movie stars, prominent athletes, politicians and, in some cases, heads
of state.”

Lloyd observes that “boy prostitutes in Times Square outnumber female
hookers five to one.”

Really? Why is the American public largely unaware that roughly
500,000 boys sell street sex to adult males of this great nation? Why
are adult molesters — infecting thousands of boys with AIDS — not
jailed for contributing to the delinquency of minors, statutory rape and
premeditated murder?

Do “prominent” customers in the legislature, the White House, the
Fourth Estate or the U.S. Justice Department cripple the criminal
prosecution of child pornographers — and worse?

Where do these boy prostitutes come from? Many are runaways from
tragic homes, of course. But, largely invisible to decent parents, there
is also a successful ongoing media and classroom campaign to recraft
many, if not most, children into “bi / gay youth.”

A recent report from Seventeen magazine claims that 54 percent of
teens polled in 1999 (versus 17 percent polled in 1991) now find
homosexuality admissible: “Teens today are likely to experiment: 21
percent … have fantasized about fooling around with someone of the
same sex — and 15 percent say they have actually done so.” And how has
this gay fantasy emerged as a cultural phenomenon among children?

Establishment media and sex educators in the classroom both
vigorously promote juvenile homosexual experimentation while suppressing
the darker data on inter-gay violence — data on men and boys battered
and killed by sex clients, pickups, prostitutes and “lovers.”

Especially hidden by both homosexual and establishment media are the
tragic data on homosexual violence against children and inter-gay
battery.

An example of this suppression is the aggressive cry of “hate crimes”
surrounding the heterosexual killers of Matthew Shepard and Barry
Winchell (who was allegedly gay, but that is for another column) while
covering up the barbaric murder of 13-year-old Jesse Dirkhising by two
trusted homosexual friends of Jesse’s mother. Young Jesse did not
survive being “bound, gagged … repeatedly raped in a sado-masochistic
ritual.” What of the rape and decapitation of Adam Walsh, carried out
by two homosexual “lovers” or the castration of a Tacoma, Wash., boy a
few years ago by a paroled homosexual child rapist?

Why was the vicious 1997 kidnap / rape / murder of 10-year-old
Jeffrey Curley covered-up by the media until the recent $200 million
lawsuit filed by the boy’s parents against NAMBLA, the homosexual group
urging sex with boys to the two killers — both gay boy “lovers”?

Knowledge of such gay violence is critical if parents and the polity
are to make informed choices about leaving children with homosexual
acquaintances or authorities. Gay violence is not exclusively directed
against children — “hate crimes” are commonly committed against one
another. In their well-documented book, “Men Who Beat the Men Who Love
Them,” Island and Letellier exposed a cultural pattern of inter-gay
violence. At least “every 90 seconds … a gay man is abused” by his
“lover.”

The homosexual authors confirm common sense. “(G)ay men truly …
have a proportionate share of violent individuals in their midst who
bash other gay men (and boys) in startlingly high numbers. The gay
community needs to recognize that wealthy, white, educated, ‘politically
correct’ gay men batter their lovers.”

How many of these “lovers” — boys and men — die of their wounds?
We’ll probably never know.

Island and Letellier report that establishment and homosexual media
agencies will not print the truth about inter-gay violence because “It
would be just plain bad press for gays and … all bad news needs to be
suppressed.” Lloyd agrees, saying of boy-abusers individually and in
groups, “(The police raids) usually go unreported by the press. Both
wire services, the AP and UPI, file the stories to newspapers, radio
stations and television stations but always with the cautionary
headline, ‘EDITORS (NOTE NATURE OF THE STORY).'”

Lloyd adds, “Editors do … and often elect not to use them.” The
press suppresses police reports of raids and arrests of men preying on
boys.

It is little wonder that movement homosexuals are waging a vicious
censorship campaign against Dr. Laura, including threats against her
life. Too many of her guests could be like her. Some would even be
homosexual whistle-blowers, daring to confirm the darker data of
gay-on-child sex abuse and self-inflicted inter-gay violence.

Such a child-protection expose cannot be tolerated by gay-tolerance
spokespersons. It would indeed be “just plain bad press” were parents
alerted to the increasing gay danger lurking in all their children’s
lives.

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.