Almost 20 years ago, I interviewed a doctor who was challenging the Internal Revenue Service in court, defending himself, claiming that he was not required to file an income tax return because income taxes were unconstitutional.

A passionate and articulate Libertarian, he eloquently laid out his legal arguments for me, and shortly thereafter made the same pitch to a jury of his peers in federal court.

Unfortunately, they decided he was just trying to avoid “paying his fair share” of taxes, and he was sentenced to a year and a half in federal prison.

Not too long after he had served his time, I interviewed the same gentleman again, and asked him, would he do it all over again?

“No,” he answered thoughtfully, “I wouldn’t.”

He had missed the birth of his daughter, had lost his medical practice and subjected his family to great emotional and financial hardship. The price had been great, and what good had actually been accomplished was questionable.

But today, many more people are engaged in what is variously called the “tax protest,” “tax freedom” or “tax honesty” movement. Full-page ads in USA Today proclaim their core beliefs and legal arguments. An April 9 demonstration in the nation’s capital will feature hundreds of citizens surrounding the Internal Revenue Service headquarters wearing windbreakers imprinted with the words, “Tyranny Response Team.” A recently-filed lawsuit in Oklahoma, with two more to follow, is designed to prove in court that the 16th Amendment that gave us the income tax was never even ratified.

Who are these people?

Are they, as the Senate Finance Committee is saying in their hearing this morning, “scam artists”? Are they patriots and constitutional scholars, as they regard themselves? Are they “foolish heroes,” as the Cato Institute’s tax analyst Roger Pilon described them to CBS News this week, “reading the tax law in so strained a way, [that] they will in time pay the price for it. But,” Pilon further reasoned, “they’re heroes in the sense that they are bringing public attention to an issue that needs public attention.”

Although it’s easy enough to scratch the surface — yes, there are both patriots and shysters in their ranks — getting to the heart of the matter is something else. Having watched this movement for two decades, I can tell you that I’ve never yet seen a journalistic effort that actually dealt forthrightly and definitively with this issue. Virtually everything available on the subject is either: 1) tendered by the activists themselves — and therefore, although understandably passionate and often persuasive, readers never really know whether what is being said will free them from tyranny or land them in jail; or it’s 2) just like what CBS aired the other night on “60 Minutes II.”

CBS’ story was like virtually all “mainstream” press coverage of this issue — all heat and no light. It was the usual formula: First give voice to the words and arguments of the tax protesters. Then have government officials knock them down, saying in essence: These people are wrong, their arguments are frivolous, and they’re headed for fines and penalties, and possible prosecution and jail. End of story.

Well, that’s where WorldNet magazine’s current issue begins. The April edition of our popular monthly print magazine is, I believe, the first time that the key arguments animating income-tax opponents have actually been analyzed journalistically — that is, objectively, thoroughly and without regard to whom we make mad.

Is the act of signing your 1040 tax return on penalty of perjury — a felony — tantamount to giving up your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination? Is the income tax actually voluntary? Can employers really stop withholding from their workers’ paychecks, as those activists in the CBS report claim? And was the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ever properly ratified? There is persuasive evidence that it was not.

If you want to get to the bottom of these issues for once and for all, then you must read the April issue of WorldNet.

But I would like to take it one step further and ask you to consider the following proposition very carefully:

If you really value WorldNetDaily, then subscribe to WorldNet.

Here’s my reasoning: labors around-the-clock to bring you the most reliable, enlightening and hardest hitting news source on the Internet. Your newspaper is delivered, so to speak, to your home — for free — seven days a week.

The magazine, on the other hand, delivers to you an in-depth, definitive exploration each month of crucial issues, many of which are the very issues that you care the most about, but for which reliable information is scarce.

Consider these future WorldNet issues already on the drawing board:

May: Expos? of the IMF and the World Bank.

June: Inside story on government spending.

Then, hold on to your seats: evolution; the U.N. and globalization; guns in America; the deliberate dumbing-down of America’s government schools; radical environmentalism; Christian persecution in U.S.; abortion; who controls America? Secret societies, power brokers and hidden agendas; private property; alternative currencies; states’ rights; the radical homosexual agenda; the drug war; asset forfeiture laws; Social Security (do you have to be a number?); vaccines; and more — though not necessarily in this exact order.

You get the idea — these are the issues that really affect each of our lives, but which somehow are off the establishment media’s radar.

So here’s my deal: brings you the news, while WorldNet magazine provides the insight, understanding and background that will make our daily news coverage come alive. Together, we feel WND and WorldNet fulfill our obligation to bring you the very best news coverage possible.

There is also no better way to support than to subscribe to WorldNet magazine. And conversely, no better way for us to provide you our best insights and research on the most important subjects affecting our lives and freedom, than through our magazine. By subscribing to WorldNet for $3 per month ($36/year), you are “watering” both and WorldNet magazine and allowing both to thrive. And so, we help each other.

Is that a sweet deal or what? If it works for you, then please let me know, and subscribe to WorldNet magazine. Thanks very much.

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.