Howard Stern is a filthy, profane, vulgar, obscene disgusting pig.
He shouldn’t be on the radio. He should be in the zoo.
Three cheers for Clear Channel Communication’s decision to pull his show off the air temporarily. It’s late, after all these years of smut-peddling on the radio, but the decision should be applauded.
It’s a smart move. It’s the right thing to do. It’s a good business decision. Anyone who believes in right and wrong ought to know that a slimebucket like Stern has no place on the public airwaves.
In good conscience, I can’t even describe adequately what Stern said on his program that got him suspended. All I will say is it had to to with the “n” word, anal sex, the size of certain parts of the male anatomy, etc. You get the idea – the usual Howard Stern, over-the-top, shock-jock antics.
It might make short-term sense for a company to pollute the air and water rather than dispose of waste responsibly. But, in the long term, it makes more sense not to kill your customers.
In the same way, our popular culture is becoming a moral cesspool, polluted by the likes of Stern, Janet Jackson, Viacom, CBS and a thousand other irresponsible clowns and corporations that will do whatever they can get away with for shock value, ratings and short-term advantage. Long term, it makes sense to police oneself in matters of media decency, too. Moral toxicity can be as lethal to a society as air and water pollution – maybe more so.
Let me make something very clear: Howard Stern was pulled from Clear Channel stations and warned to clean up his act by one broadcasting company. He wasn’t kicked off radio by the Federal Communications Commission.
This is a case where a company is exercising good judgment and corporate responsibility to make the right call. This is a story of a broadcaster policing itself. What’s wrong with that?
This is not a censorship issue. It’s responsible decision by a broadcaster about the programming it offers. Yes, the Federal Communications Commission is beginning to take seriously its mission of policing the airwaves. Yes, I take a backseat to no one when it comes to fear of government.
But the Stern controversy is not about government’s heavy hand.
If it were up to me, we could run the entire federal government on 10 percent of what we spend today – and our country would be healthier, safer, freer.
The truth is we will be a lot closer to that goal when more individuals and companies in this country start making good, responsible, self-governing choices – as Clear Channel belatedly did with Howard Stern.
There are many reasons to worry about the government’s role in broadcasting. There are attempts to bring back the fairness doctrine. I agree some politicians would like to use that kind of legislation shut down the free flow of information on talk radio.
But matters of decency and obscenity are not the same as political speech. We should never make that mistake. Those of us with children understand how difficult it is to protect them, to shelter them, to preserve their innocence in today’s media environment.
Clear Channel made the right decision.