Claiming Muhammad’s teachings are the root of terrorism, a website founded by an ex-Muslim attempts to dispel the oft-quoted statement “Islam is a religion of peace.”
Headed by Ali Sina, FaithFreedom.org presents articles and commentaries that debunk much of the Quran and charge that Islam’s founder, Muhammad, was a rapist, pedophile, mass murderer and an “evil man.”
On the site, which features, the description “Islam and Quran denounced by ex-Muslims as the root of terrorism,” Sina promises that if anyone can prove him wrong in his assertions about Muhammad and Islam, he will take the site off the Internet.
After presenting a list of charges against Muhammad, Sina writes, “Muslims are triumphalists and claim victory even when they are clearly defeated. A Muslim can never accept defeat. A Muslim’s typical response to this site is: ‘My faith in Islam grew after I read your site.’ How can one’s faith grow after reading the proof that the man whom he thought to be a prophet was guilty of all the above charges? Has anyone disproved any of those charges?”
Continues Sina: “I have debated with Muslims who claimed victory because according to them I have not proven that Muhammad’s sexual relationship at the age of 53 with the 8 years 9 months old Aisha constitute pedophilia. I consider this a self-evident fact that needs no proof. I do not think there is any need to prove that day is bright and night is dark to a seeing person. And to [the] blind proofs are of no avail.”
Besides Sina’s writings, the site features other writers who delve into many different areas of Islam.
One section, for example, is called “Wives of the Prophet” and includes this introduction:
“The tales of Muhammad’s wives and sex slaves are the most fascinating and also the most embarrassing part of the life of the Prophet. These are stories of lust, intrigues, mind games, jealousy and betrayal.”
Another section attempts to disprove the alleged miracles of Islam.
Sina reads Arabic and, he says, uses only “the hadith, the Ibn Hisham’s Sira and the Quran” when arguing against Islam.
Also featured on the site are the writings of historical figures that help make Sina’s point, like this one from Winston Churchill:
“Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Muhammadan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”
While Sina’s site skewers Islam in many ways, it doesn’t suggest a replacement religion.
Writes Sina: “My criticism applies to all religions. The very concept of God sending messengers to be known and worshipped is absurd. All those who come pretending to bring a message from an invisible god that only they can see are charlatans and their claims are bogus. I do believe in a higher Reality and a Single Principle underlying the creation, but not in an egotistic self-centered petulant deity as depicted by these self-appointed prophets.”