Just when you thought kids were safer now that Michael Jackson is out of the country …
In Kelo vs. New London, Conn., the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that it was OK to rob people of their property if the community (community of government) could collect more taxes if somebody else owned the property. Now, out west, the legendary 9th Circuit Court has, in essence, proclaimed that the government has a sort of sexual eminent domain over children in public schools.
“Eminent domain” is the right of the government to seize peoples’ private property for public use. “Sexual eminent domain” is the right of government to seize kids’ privates for public use.
The 9th Circuit, whose rulings cover nine states (10 if you count “shock”), found that parents have no constitutional right to prevent public schools from providing information on the subject of sex to their students in any forum or manner they choose. Anybody else, however, could still be sent to San Quentin for doing the same thing.
In this particular case, the 9th upheld a lower-court ruling and threw out a lawsuit brought by parents against a school district north of Los Angeles that distributed surveys to students which contained questions on sexual issues.
The survey was given to first, third, and fifth graders, and the questions were of a nature that, were they asked by anybody but “professional educators”, the questioner would have been jailed as a suspected pedophile.
Questions on the survey dealt with the following:
- Touching my private parts too much
- Washing myself because I feel dirty on the inside
- Not trusting people because they might want sex
- Getting scared or upset when I think about sex
- Having sex feelings in my body
- Can’t stop thinking about sex
- Getting upset when people talk about sex
Add a chimp, Ferris wheel and wine cellar to the equation and this “survey” was edging dangerously close to a Neverland Ranch entrance exam. How in the world could kids “stop thinking about sex” when these public-school perverts wouldn’t allow them to?
The school says the survey was given to children in the first, third and fifth grades as part of a program to gauge early trauma and help youngsters overcome barriers to learning. I’m guessing the test was conducted by “trained professionals” who themselves tested positive for No. 1 and No. 6.
The school stopped conducting the survey in 2002, amid complaints from parents, but the precedent will last forever, at worst – or until it’s overturned, at best.
What was the reasoning? A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit concluded the following:
There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children … Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed while enrolled as students.
It’s impossible to have a discussion about the continued breakdown of schools and courts without talking about homeschooling.
One of the arguments against homeschooling by public-school advocates is that most parents are “not qualified” to teach kids.
With that in mind, travel from school to school some day and play a game of “count the obese gym instructors who the NEA considers ‘qualified’ to teach physical education.” It’s not unfair to assume that instructors in other topics could be equally as “qualified.”
As for the 9th’s ruling, I’m willing to bet that, if the tables were turned, parents would have more say over what their children are taught and asked by public schools. What do I mean? Well, let’s assume there’s some school under the jurisdiction of the 9th Circuit that is very conservative in its sexual teachings.
Then along comes a parent – some nosy, whiny, doorknob polishing liberal activist who thinks that there should be a “history of masturbation” class. I’ll bet next month’s mortgage payment that all of a sudden the 9th Circuit would rule that parents should have a say in kids’ public education.
One final question: If parents are excluded in all aspects of their children’s education, wouldn’t that exclusion make “public” schools in reality “private” schools? Maybe there’s a loophole for recourse for parents, since the 9th’s ruling doesn’t exercise dominion over private schools.
Sure that’s a stretch, but after observing the 9th Circuit’s rulings over the years, major stretching is allowed.