• Text smaller
  • Text bigger

Editor’s note: The following report is excerpted from the latest issue of Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by the founder of WND. Annual subscriptions have been reduced to $99 and include a free copy of Farah’s latest book, “Taking America Back.” Monthly trial subscriptions are available to credit-card users for just $9.95.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Export-Import Bank, a federal agency, has given a preliminary commitment to backing Westinghouse Electric Company’s bid to build Chinese nuclear reactors.

It’s part of an aggressive effort by the U.S. government to create American jobs and chip away at the trade imbalance between China and the U.S., said a spokesman for the bank.

Should the deal get final approval, Westinghouse and/or the Chinese government would be the beneficiary of loans or loan guarantees of almost $5 billion to build nuclear power plants in China.

While Westinghouse is based in the U.S., it is currently owned by British Nuclear Fuels Ltd., which has made plans to sell it off to Toshiba, a Japanese conglomerate.

So far, no one in the U.S. government is showing any interest in scrutinizing the sale over the transfer of nuclear-power technology.

The saga began just over a year ago when the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the U.S., a federal agency whose board members are appointed by the president, provided the preliminary commitment to a request from Westinghouse for a combination of guaranteed and direct loans of up to almost $5 billion to support export sales to construct four nuclear power plants at two sites in China.

The Ex-Im Bank, as it is known, boasts of assisting in financing U.S. goods and services to developing markets around the world. It typically finances around $15 billion in U.S. exports annually.

While that deal got almost no notice at the time – despite China’s record of spreading nuclear technology throughout the world – last month the British parent company that owns Westinghouse agreed to sell it off to Toshiba, a Japanese conglomerate, for $5.4 billion in cash, a deal that is expected to close later this year.

Undersecretary for Export Administration David McCormick said Wednesday in a speech in Pennsylvania he had no plans to review the bid on the basis of the nuclear-transfer issue.

“The deal is not being formally reviewed,” said McCormick, who heads the Commerce Department agency. “It’s unclear if this deal required (U.S. government) review or not. Scrutiny would be justified, he said, if “there’s a perceived or actual threat to national security.”

Congress has not opposed the Westinghouse sale. In fact, the only member to call for scrutiny, Rep. Ralph Hall, R-Texas, a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, recently dropped his concerns. In a letter to Rep. Tim Murphy, R-Pennsylvania, whose district includes Monroeville, where Westinghouse is based, Hall called Japan “one of our finest allies.”

Meanwhile, Westinghouse may have a better shot at the $8 billion in nuclear contracts bid by China. Its chief competitor for the project, the state-controlled French company Areva SA is considering dropping its bid because of concerns about nuclear-technology transfers to the Chinese. Areva SA has reportedly refused to match the offer from Westinghouse.

While China has run massive trade surpluses with the U.S. for many years, Phil Cogan, a spokesman for the Ex-Im Bank said efforts like this one are designed to offset the trade imbalance and create jobs for American workers.

In the last five years, here is the trend on China trade surpluses with the U.S.:

  • 2001 $83 billion

  • 2002 $103 billion
  • 2003 $124 billion
  • 2004 $162 billion
  • 2005 $201 billion

    In U.S.-China trade, that’s a total of $673 billion in trade surpluses for the Chinese (or trade deficits for America) in just the last five years.

    Not only is the U.S. government not questioning the deal to build nuclear reactors in China, it is considering financing it in part and using political influence at the highest levels to consummate the arrangement.

    “The U.S. government has been very supportive of overall China-U.S. nuclear cooperation,” says Gavin Liu, Westinghouse’s representative in Beijing. “It’s a very, very critical market for Westinghouse.”

    China’s nuclear-power market is growing faster than any other in the world. The four planned reactors are the first of more than 20 in a $54 billion push to quadruple Chinese nuclear-power capacity by 2020 – an effort to ease power shortages in an economy that grew 9.5 percent last year.

    Read more details by getting full access to Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin with an annual or monthly subscription.

    • Text smaller
    • Text bigger
  • Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.