In the wake of growing skepticism, the U.S. government is taking the unusual step of responding to conspiracy theories about the Sept. 11, 2001, destruction of the World Trade Center.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST, headquartered in Gaithersberg, Md., investigated the causes of the collapse of the twin towers. Yesterday NIST announced it had posted a “fact sheet” addressing alternative theories about the World Trade Center fires and collapse.

The government’s response comes in response to accusations and suspicions of increasing numbers of Americans that the official explanation of the events of Sept. 11, 2001 – that 19 Muslim terrorists hijacked four U.S. jetliners and crashed them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, with a fourth being downed in rural Pennsylvania – are wrong. In fact, a shocking new Scripps Howard poll shows a third of Americans believe the U.S. government was complicit in the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

The current edition of WND’s acclaimed Whistleblower magazine takes a close look at the controversial issue of alternative 9/11 theories in its September edition, titled “9/11: FIVE YEARS LATER, A TIME FOR TRUTH.”

On its website, the National Institute of Standards and Technology posed 14 questions regarding the 9/11 terror attacks and answered each in detail. For instance, one question asked:

Why did NIST not consider a “controlled demolition” hypothesis with matching computer modeling and explanation as it did for the “pancake theory” hypothesis? A key critique of NIST’s work lies in the complete lack of analysis supporting a “progressive collapse” after the point of collapse initiation and the lack of consideration given to a controlled demolition hypothesis.

Here’s is the government’s response:

NIST conducted an extremely thorough three-year investigation into what caused the WTC towers to collapse, as explained in NIST’s dedicated Web site. This included consideration of a number of hypotheses for the collapses of the towers.

Some 200 technical experts – including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia – reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.

Based on this comprehensive investigation, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. Both photographic and video evidence – as well as accounts from the New York Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse – support this sequence for each tower.

NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC towers (the composite floor system – that connected the core columns and the perimeter columns – consisted of a grid of steel “trusses” integrated with a concrete slab; see diagram below). Instead, the NIST investigation showed conclusively that the failure of the inwardly bowed perimeter columns initiated collapse and that the occurrence of this inward bowing required the sagging floors to remain connected to the columns and pull the columns inwards. Thus, the floors did not fail progressively to cause a pancaking phenomenon.

NIST’s findings also do not support the “controlled demolition” theory since there is conclusive evidence that:

  • the collapse was initiated in the impact and fire floors of the WTC towers and nowhere else, and;

  • the time it took for the collapse to initiate (56 minutes for WTC 2 and 102 minutes for WTC 1) was dictated by (1) the extent of damage caused by the aircraft impact, and (2) the time it took for the fires to reach critical locations and weaken the structure to the point that the towers could not resist the tremendous energy released by the downward movement of the massive top section of the building at and above the fire and impact floors.

    Video evidence also showed unambiguously that the collapse progressed from the top to the bottom, and there was no evidence (collected by NIST, or by the New York Police Department, the Port Authority Police Department or the Fire Department of New York) of any blast or explosions in the region below the impact and fire floors as the top building sections (including and above the 98th floor in WTC 1 and the 82nd floor in WTC 2) began their downward movement upon collapse initiation.

    In summary, NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives planted prior to Sept. 11, 2001. NIST also did not find any evidence that missiles were fired at or hit the towers. Instead, photographs and videos from several angles clearly show that the collapse initiated at the fire and impact floors and that the collapse progressed from the initiating floors downward until the dust clouds obscured the view.

  • Other questions posed and answered by NIST include:

  • If the World Trade Center (WTC) towers were designed to withstand multiple impacts by Boeing 707 aircraft, why did the impact of individual 767s cause so much damage?

  • How could the WTC towers have collapsed without a controlled demolition since no steel-frame, high-rise buildings have ever before or since been brought down due to fires? Temperatures due to fire don’t get hot enough for buildings to collapse.

  • Weren’t the puffs of smoke that were seen, as the collapse of each WTC tower starts, evidence of controlled demolition explosions?

  • Why were two distinct spikes – one for each tower – seen in seismic records before the towers collapsed? Isn’t this indicative of an explosion occurring in each tower?

  • How could the WTC towers collapse in only 11 seconds (WTC 1) and 9 seconds (WTC 2) – speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)?

  • How could the steel have melted if the fires in the WTC towers weren’t hot enough to do so? Or, since the melting point of steel is about 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit and Underwriters Laboratories (UL) certified the steel in the WTC towers to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for six hours, how could fires have impacted the steel enough to bring down the WTC towers?

  • We know that the sprinkler systems were activated because survivors reported water in the stairwells. If the sprinklers were working, how could there be a “raging inferno” in the WTC towers?

  • If thick black smoke is characteristic of an oxygen-starved, lower temperature, less intense fire, why was thick black smoke exiting the WTC towers when the fires inside were supposed to be extremely hot?

  • Why were people seen in the gaps left by the plane impacts if the heat from the fires behind them was so excessive?

  • Why do some photographs show a yellow stream of molten metal pouring down the side of WTC2 that NIST claims was aluminum from the crashed plane although aluminum burns with a white glow?

  • Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? The combination of thermite and sulfur (called thermate) “slices through steel like a hot knife through butter.”

  • Why did the NIST investigation not consider reports of molten steel in the wreckage from the WTC towers?

  • Why is the NIST investigation of the collapse of WTC 7 (the 47-story office building that collapsed on Sept. 11, 2001, hours after the towers) taking so long to complete? Is a controlled demolition hypothesis being considered to explain the collapse?


    SPECIAL OFFER: The September issue of Whistleblower magazine takes an objective look at the “9/11 truth movement” and alternate 9/11 theories, and is titled “9/11: FIVE YEARS LATER, A TIME FOR TRUTH.”

    Until Sept. 11, 2006, at 10 p.m. Pacific, WND is making this fantastic triple offer when you subscribe to Whistleblower (or renew or give a gift subscription):

    1) Get $10 off (pay only $39.95 instead of the usual $49.95)



    2) Get a FREE hardcover copy of Tom Tancredo’s brand-new blockbuster book, “In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and Security” (a $24.95 value), and

    3) Get a FREE copy of “THE FEDERAL RESERVE: FRAUD OF THE CENTURY.”



    Even better, subscribe for two years (or renew or give a gift sub for two years) and get all of the above – $10 off (pay $74.95 rather than $84.95), plus Tancredo’s new book, plus the special Whistleblower issue – PLUS you’ll also receive a FREE, autographed copy of David Kupelian’s controversial bestseller, “The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom.”

    SUBSCRIBE TO WHISTLEBLOWER before Sept. 11 at 10 p.m. Pacific and save $10, get a free copy of Tom Tancredo’s “In Mortal Danger,” and a free copy of “THE FEDERAL RESERVE: FRAUD OF THE CENTURY.” Subscribe for two years and get all of the above, plus a free, autographed copy of “The Marketing of Evil.”

    RENEW YOUR WHISTLEBLOWER SUBSCRIPTION before Sept. 11 at 10 p.m. Pacific and save $10, plus get a free copy of Tom Tancredo’s “In Mortal Danger.” Subscribe for two years and get all of the above, plus a free, autographed copy of “The Marketing of Evil.”

    GIVE A GIFT WHISTLEBLOWER SUBSCRIPTION before Sept. 11 at 10 p.m. Pacific and save $10, get a free copy of Tom Tancredo’s “In Mortal Danger,” and a free copy of “THE FEDERAL RESERVE: FRAUD OF THE CENTURY.” Subscribe for two years and get all of the above, plus a free, autographed copy of “The Marketing of Evil.”

    NOTE: When shopping in WND’s online store you have the option of paying with either a credit card or a check.

    If you wish to order by phone, call our toll-free order line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).

  • Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.