Six girls barred from performing in a city’s holiday show because they wore “Jesus Christ Dancers” shirts settled a federal lawsuit in which they were awarded $3,000 each.

The American Family Association Center for Law & Policy, representing the girls and their instructor, reached an agreement with the city of Chula Vista, which refused to let them perform “because of the Christian message on their T-shirts and the Christian theme music they planned to dance to.”

As WND reported, the girls, ages 8 to 12, were scheduled to perform a hip-hop dance routine Dec. 3, 2005, at a “Holiday Festival.”

A consent decree signed Oct. 24 ordered the city to pay $3,000 to each of the girls and to their dance instructor. Another $10,000 is to be paid for attorney fees and costs. Also included in the settlement is a requirement by the court for the city “to provide First Amendment training on an annual basis to its police officers and all city employees who are classified as mid-managers and above.”

Attorney Brian Fahling said Chula Vista “is to be commended for stepping forward and acknowledging it violated the girl’s constitutional rights.”

Tim Wildmon, president of the American Center of Law & Policy’s parent group, the American Family Association, said “the girls had a great civics lesson in all of this … they learned that asserting their constitutional rights benefits not just them, but all of us.”

The dancers were listed first on the Holiday Festival’s schedule of performers, but officials kept the girls waiting 80 minutes as they deliberated about whether to allow the act, according to the instructor, Lita Ramirez.

When finally informed they could not perform, the girls began to cry, some hysterically, parents said.

Ramirez described the experience as humiliating.

Fahling, at the time, called the conduct of Chula Vista officials “inexcusable.”

“The city allowed a Hawaiian prayer dance, a belly dancer and other ‘holiday’ performers, and there was a tree-lighting ceremony afterward where a rabbi lighted a menorah, but six young girls wearing T-shirts with ‘Jesus Dancer’ and a cross silk-screened on them was too offensive,” he said.

The lawsuit alleged the city’s decision “was impermissible viewpoint-based discrimination against religious speech in a public forum.”

Specifically, the complaint said the city prohibited “the name of Jesus being displayed and the songs with words that praise the Christian God from being played while permitting other religious and secular songs and expression.”



Related special offers:

Save up to 90% with WND’s pre-Christmas Sale!

Check out WorldNetDaily’s politically incorrect Christmas items

Merry Christmas! Proudly wear it on your sleeve

Bill O’Reilly’s “Culture Warrior”

Criminalizing Christianity: How America’s founding religion is becoming illegal

‘Christmas Songs Made in America’

The incredible Jerusalem Compass

Tick off the ACLU! New edition of 100-year-old book proves America’s Christian heritage

Compact Text Bible, New King James Version

New Strong’s Expanded Exhaustive Concordance

“Help! Mom! There are Liberals Under My Bed”



Previous stories:

‘Holiday’ tree axed in favor of ‘Christmas’

Sam’s Club to reinstate ‘Christmas’

Christmas ‘ban’ prompts Supreme Court petition

Christmas trees OK, not Jewish menorahs

District resurrects ‘Christmas’ vacation

Appeals court bars Nativity at schools

New patriarch sabotages Israel’s Christmas party

Muslim grinches steal Bethlehem Christmas

Christmas battles waged to last minute

Banned ‘Jesus Dancers’ file federal suit

Lawsuit challenges Christmas-music ban

Jackie Mason to defend Christmas

Housing officials ‘cancel’ Christmas

Christian performers barred from city event

Boycott of Target over next Christmas

‘Merry Christmas’ boycott targets Sears

Dreaming of a White House ‘Christmas’

Lowe’s listens: ‘Christmas trees’

‘Christmas’ trees vs. ‘Holiday’ trees

Target petition passes quarter million

Target boycott urged for Thanksgiving weekend

Wal-Mart boycott ends with apology

Wal-Mart worker ‘history’ after ‘origin’ of Christmas

Wal-Mart faces boycott for ‘banning’ Christmas

Target extends ban on Salvation Army

Couple wins Nativity scene battle

‘Silent Night’ gets reprieve

Library backs down, welcomes holy family

Holy family, Magi nixed from Nativity

Christmas carols banned, but Hanukkah songs OK

Student protests university’s ‘Holiday tree’

Another school censoring Christmas?

‘Christmas’ trees vs. ‘Holiday’ trees

Group takes offensive with Nativity scenes

Dreaming of a White House ‘Christmas’

Clergy extend Target boycott

Bush White House’s Christ-less Christmas

Anti-Christmas district hit with federal lawsuit

Nativity display erected on public land by church

Officials remove Nativity to avoid ACLU

Officials reverse decision to bar Christmas trees

Jersey mayor sponsors ‘illegal’ caroling

Homosexuals behind Target action?

District prohibits Christmas colors

Federal judge rules for Nativity display

School district backs down, will allow Christmas cards

School censors Christmas from student performance

Christmas music banned, then unbanned from bus

Principal cancels dramatization of ‘A Christmas Carol’

Church leaders threatens Target boycott

Denver backtracks on Christmas sign

Town prohibiting Nativity scene sued

District bans instrumental Christmas carols

Christmas card with ‘Jesus’ banned

Christmas CD banned for mentioning Jesus

Teacher takes ‘Christmas’ out of carol

Students threatened by Christmas?

‘No Christian symbols at Christmas’

School bans Christmas, but OK with Halloween

School bans saying ‘Christmas’

Christmas in America becomes battleground

Ban on Christmas leads to court fight

Christmas book banned from class

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.