- WND - http://www.wnd.com -

Google: Veterans Day 'too solemn' for logo

Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 11/14/2006 @ 9:56 am In Front Page | Comments Disabled


In response to e-mail generated by a WND story noting Google didn’t mark Veterans Day for an eighth straight year, the search engine giant created a form letter explaining the non-commemoration of the holiday was deliberate and out of reverence.

“Thank you for your note,” read the form response. “We understand your concern and interest in seeing a Veteran’s (sic) Day Google logo. If we were to commemorate this holiday, we’d want to express reverence; however, as Google’s special logos tend to be lighthearted in nature, this would be a particularly challenging design. We wouldn’t want to create a graphic that could be interpreted as disrespectful in any way.”


Despite the claim, Google for Canada honored Remembrance Day, the Canadian version of the U.S. Veterans Day last Saturday with a stylized logo featuring three poppies.

Poppies became associated with Remembrance Day because of the poem written by Canadian physician and Lt. Col. John McCrae in 1915, “In Flanders Fields.”

It begins:

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

As WND reported, Google marks special occasions including Halloween, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s birthday, the Persian New Year, the birthday of Percival Lowell, the Lunar New Year, the 250th birthday of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and Louis Braille’s birthday – all celebrated already this year with special graphics and colors.

But for the 8th year in a row, Google has made no effort to commemorate any holiday honoring U.S. veterans or war dead – no tributes to Veterans Day or Memorial Day.


Google’s holiday signature is a dressed-up corporate logo for major holidays and lesser-known occasions alike. Besides overlooking Veterans Day and Memorial Day since the company’s inception in 1999, it has also ignored Christmas and Easter.

Google has been criticized for its one-sided political contributions and content policies:

  • Rejecting an ad for a book critical of Bill and Hillary Clinton while continuing to accept anti-Bush themes
  • Rejecting ads critical of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., while continuing to run attack ads against besieged House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas.
  • Allowing the communist Chinese government to have the search engine block “objectionable” search terms such as “democracy.”

In addition, the company came under fire for an editorial decision giving preferential placement to large, elite media outlets such as CNN and the BBC over independent news sources, such as WND, even if they are more recent, pertinent and exhaustive in their coverage.


As WND reported, 98 percent of all political donations by Google employees went to support Democrats, and as a matter of fact, Al Gore is now a senior adviser to Google.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt gave the maximum legal limit of donations to Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry and to primary candidate Howard Dean.

Schmidt also contributed the maximum amount to Sen. Clinton.


Special offers:

Coulter exposes liberals’ ‘Godless religion’

‘Help! Mom! There are Liberals Under My Bed’

Computer screen fuzzy? Try the best cleaning solution in the world


Previous stories:

Google no-show for Veterans Day

YouTube blocked video mocking Clinton administration

Google hosts ‘boy love’ site

Bush labeled ‘a–hole’ in new Google bomb

Google map says Taiwan part of China

Google goes ballistic after getting Googled

Christian Exodus banned from Google ads

Google blocks ad for anti-Clinton book

Google still runs anti-DeLay ads

Google money engine for Democrats only

Google censoring conservative ads?

Google: Big Media has higher quality

Google censoring search results in China

Google bars ‘hate’ sites’ ads, but runs porn ads

Google bans Christian ad

Google ‘miserable failure’: It’s Bush


Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com

URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2006/11/38875/

© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.