U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton

A Border Patrol activist group is accusing U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton of protecting the drug smuggler at the center of the Ramos-Compean case from facing perjury charges.

Andy Ramirez, chairman of the Friends of the Border Patrol, wants a special prosecutor appointed to investigate Sutton and trial prosecutor Debra Kanof for subornation of perjury for allowing drug smuggler Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila to take the stand under “false pretenses.”

Aldrete-Davila was arrested last week at the Mexican border for alleged drug offenses committed while under immunity to testify as the star witness in the case. Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean are in solitary confinement in federal prisons serving 11- and 12-year terms respectively for shooting Aldrete-Davila as he fled across the border on foot after bringing 750 pounds of marijuana across the Texas border.

Ramirez told WND he believes Aldrete-Davila’s arrest last week clearly indicates he violated the terms of his immunity.

“Sutton is still protecting Aldrete-Davila,” Ramirez told WND, “otherwise the drug smuggler would have been indicted for the first drug offense and for perjury.”

Ramirez argued that without immunity for the Feb. 17, 2005, incident involving Ramos and Compean, Aldrete-Davila could be prosecuted not only for that smuggling attempt but also for a later attempt while using a border pass card issued by the Department of Homeland Security.

Ramirez called for all the documents in the case to be unsealed.

“Why is Sutton still keeping a lot of records about Aldrete-Davila secret?” Ramirez asked. “Even the appellant filings in the Ramos and Compean case and the government’s responses to the appellant filings are under seal.”

Ramirez also points to “files about how Aldrete-Davila was found in Mexico and the contacts the federal government has with the Mexican consulate at all levels in this case.”

He asserted a special prosecutor to investigate Sutton and Kanof for subornation of perjury is justified.

“Sutton knew Aldrete-Davila had been implicated as the drug smuggler in the second October 2005 load,” Ramirez explained, “yet Sutton let Kanof put Aldrete-Davila on the stand without letting the jury know the full truth – that the prosecutors were told by Department of Homeland Security and Drug Enforcement Agency before the trial started that Aldrete-Davila had been implicated in a second load.”

At that point, Ramirez contended, Sutton should have called off the trial.

“As soon as Sutton got the DHS and DEA memos about the second load, he should have started investigating whether Aldrete-Davila violated the terms of his immunity, so Aldrete-Davila could have been prosecuted instead of being used as a witness against Ramos and Compean,” he said.

“Sutton was out to get Ramos and Compean from the beginning,” Ramirez charged.

“It’s pretty simple,” he argued. “Aldrete-Davila lied under oath on the stand and Sutton permitted Kanof to let that happen.”

Ramirez believes Sutton was guilty of prosecutorial misconduct, allowing Aldrete-Davila “to take the stand, knowing exactly the lies he was going to tell.”

“It’s time for a special prosecutor to be appointed,” he said. “Sutton is an overzealous prosecutor, just like Mike Nifong in the Duke University case, and he needs to be fully investigated.”

The key to the prosecution’s case was its assertion that Ramos and Compean were rogue cops who fired on an unarmed man. But Ramirez argues that since the smuggler got away, there is “no irrefutable evidence at the scene” that he was unarmed.

“Aldrete-Davila was the only witness who could testify he was unarmed,” Ramirez said.

“All Sutton and Kanof ever had was the lying word of an admitted drug smuggler who we now know did commit additional drug offenses before the trial ever began,” he emphasized.

In April, as WND reported, the federal government obtained an indictment against Cipriano Ortiz-Hernandez, who operated a safe house to which Aldrete-Davila allegedly delivered the October 2005 load. But authorities still did not pursue action against Aldrete-Davila.

“When Sutton and Kanof were told their star witness Davila was implicated by Cipriano Ortiz-Hernandez, the stash house operator, in the second load, they must have panicked,” Ramirez said.

“Aldrete-Davila committed perjury on at the trial,” he contended, “and Sutton and Kanof protected the perjury by begging the judge to seal from the jury and the public any word of the second load.”

Ramirez insisted Sutton and Kanof “were only interested in seeing Ramos and Compean go to jail, not in serving justice.”

“To protect the prosecution case, Sutton and Kanof were willing to suborn perjury, if that’s what it took to win,” he said. “This was not due process of law. Sutton reduced an American courtroom to the type of Third World kangaroo court we would expect to find in Mexico.”

WND first reported Davila’s second load Feb. 1, based on claims by Ramirez and reliable sources close to the case. The incident was confirmed when a trial transcript finally was released. The transcript showed a sidebar discussion involving the judge, prosecutors and defense attorneys in which the defense pleaded the information was vital to their ability to challenge, before the jury, Davila’s credibility as a witness.

The transcript documents that Sutton and Kanof knew prior to the trial that Aldrete-Davila had been implicated in the second load.

WND also reported a long list of lies Aldrete-Davila told under oath, including the claim he committed a single drug offense because he was under duress to get money to buy medicine for his sick mother after he lost his commercial driver’s license in Mexico.

Davila also claimed he was unfamiliar with marijuana, and he did not recognize the large bundles in the van were wrapped in the typical manner the Mexican drug cartels package the drug for smuggling into the U.S.

In addition, Davila testified he didn’t smell marijuana or notice any odor in the van as he drove to elude the Border Patrol through Fabens, Texas, in his dash for the border.

WND reported last week Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., and Ted Poe, R-Texas, have called for a congressional investigation of the prosecution in the Ramos-Compean case, with Poe also suggesting the appointment of a special prosecutor.

Special offers:

Get “The Late Great USA” and find out how America is giving away its sovereignty

“PREMEDITATED MERGER: How leaders are stealthily transforming USA into North American Union”

Autographed! – Pat Buchanan unleashed on border crisis

Tom Tancredo: America itself “In Mortal Danger”

Get Minutemen founder’s new book

“Conquest of Aztlan”: Will Mexicans retake American Southwest?

Related story:

Drug smuggler arrested for 2nd marijuana load

Previous stories:

‘Pardon Ramos and Compean now!’

Arrest prompts call for release of Ramos, Compean

Texas deputy freed from prison

Jailed Texas deputy scheduled for release

Gil Hernandez ‘fears for his life’

Border Patrol agent vindicated

Sheriff sees pattern in border agents’ cases

Feds seeking 7 years for another Texas cop

Justice urged to release Ramos-Compean documents

Records prompt call for new Ramos-Compean trial

Congressman: Bush ‘doesn’t give a damn’

Cop called ‘double agent’ in Ramos-Compean case

Ramos, Compean release on bond nixed

Border agents’ case inspires song

Feinstein still probing Ramos-Compean case

Judicial Watch seeks records in Ramos-Compean case

Sheriff: Deputy prosecuted by Mexico’s demand

Senate hearings on Ramos-Compean postponed

Smuggler’s 2nd drug case confirmed by accomplice

Ramos attorney calls for mistrial

Smuggler’s 2nd delivery of marijuana confirmed

Congressman: Probe Mexico’s role in prosecutions

Mexico demanded U.S. prosecute sheriff, agents

Discrepancies in case against Border Patrol unresolved

Compean reports reading half of Bible already

How cozy was Border Patrol with smuggler?

Border Patrol agents fired for changing testimonies

Drug smuggler left cell phone in van

Border-agent investigator had tie to smuggler

Author of DHS border-agent report lied to Congress

Officials urged to resign for lie about border agents

Government admits lying about jailed border agents

Imprisoned border agent did report shooting

Imprisoned border agent beaten by fellow inmates

Prosecutor had evidence against drug smuggler

Poe seeks ‘public’ documents on border agents

Prosecutor accused of hiding smuggler’s 2nd drug bust

Homeland Security memos contradict U.S. attorney

Uproar over border agents to get White House review

Feds ‘knew smuggler’ in Border Patrol case

Ballistics data don’t support charge against border agents

Funds set up for Border Patrol agents

Congressman: Feds stonewalling on border agents

Border agent’s wife at State of the Union

Revolt builds as Republicans seek to toss border agents’ convictions

Border Patrol agent held in solitary confinement

Imprisoned agent’s wife: President is a hypocrite

Border agents’ prosecutor responds to critics

Border agents sent to prison

Border agents plead for ‘Christmas pardon’

White House clarifies ‘nonsensical’ comment’

12 congressmen demand pardon for border agents

Snow says question on agents’ prison time ‘nonsensical’

Border Patrol agents sentenced to prison

National Guard units to be armed, close to the border

Gang expert backs Tancredo charge

National Guard units to be armed, close to the border

No militarization of U.S.-Mex border

Not even killer flu to shut U.S. border

Chertoff downplays Mexican military incursions

‘Shoot illegals’ comment earns host FCC complaint

Another armed incursion on U.S.-Mexico border

Texas border standoff with Mexican military

Border Patrol warned: Brace for violence

Feds to border agents: Assassins targeting you

Armed standoff on Rio Grande

Border sheriff warns: We’re overwhelmed

Mexican drug commandos expand ops in 6 U.S. states

It’s war between cops in Mexico

The threat from Mexico

‘It’s a war’ along Mexican border

Mexican commandos seek control of border

Mexican commandos new threat on border

Border Patrol agents shot in Laredo

Mexicans shoot at Border Patrol

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.