- WND - http://www.wnd.com -
Atheists and their lackey judges
Posted By Phyllis Schlafly On 11/30/2007 @ 1:00 am In Commentary | Comments Disabled
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Dec. 4 will again hear a challenge by Michael Newdow to the Pledge of Allegiance and its phrase “under God.” Newdow won his prior lawsuit against the pledge until the Supreme Court, perhaps to avoid public outrage in the 2004 presidential election year, tossed out his case on a procedural technicality.
Newdow’s first case caused a national uproar when he initially prevailed, but Congress failed to seize the day by withdrawing jurisdiction from the courts over this issue. Instead, Congress took away from courts jurisdiction over lawsuits against gun manufacturers and, at the urging of former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., over lawsuits by environmentalists against clearing brush in South Dakota.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is notoriously hostile to religion, so it could give us another anti-pledge decision. Atheism has spread in influence to where it controls many federal courts, many public schools and now even Hollywood, with the atheistic movie “The Golden Compass” promoted for Christmastime entertainment.
Classical music with religious names was banned at graduation by Everett School District No. 2 in Washington state. The school ordered that only “secular” music would be allowed even though there were no lyrics or words spoken, and a federal court held against the students.
Judge Robert S. Lasnik, who was appointed to the bench by former President Bill Clinton in 1998, wrote the decision. Lasnik was the same judge who struck down a Washington state law banning video games that demonstrated how to kill policemen and wrote in his decision that violent video games are “as much entitled to the protection of free speech as the best of literature.”
The intolerance of atheists and their allies has now placed the “best of” music off limits to public school performers. Goodbye to many of the great works of Bach, Haydn, Handel, Beethoven and Mozart.
It is not only courts on the West Coast that are promoting atheism. In New Jersey, an award-winning high school football coach, Marcus Borden, was ordered in 2005 by his intolerant school district not to bow his head or “take a knee” during any player-initiated prayers. Borden resigned from coaching in October over the issue.
This case illustrates how atheism in schools is often censorship in disguise. First the school district censored Borden from prayer with his players, and then censored even his silent gestures.
He sued and the trial judge ruled in his favor. But school officials and their allies were relentless and have appealed to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
These are not isolated cases: In Nevada, censors pulled the plug of the microphone in the middle of the high school valedictorian’s speech when she mentioned her Christian faith; in Virginia, a high school removed from a bulletin board materials posted by a teacher because they included reference to a day of prayer; in Chicago, a federal judge enjoined the state superintendent from enforcing a new law requiring a moment of silence in Illinois schools.
Atheism has been growing ever since the U.S. Supreme Court censored school prayer in Engel v. Vitale in 1962. That decision failed to cite a single precedent as authority.
The high court held decades ago that free speech includes prayer, yet lower courts continue to drive it from public places. In Faith Center v. Glover, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the exclusion of a Christian group from using a public library because some aspects of the group’s speech might be described as worship.
Panel member Judge Lawrence Karlton, who was appointed by former President Jimmy Carter nearly 30 years ago, ridiculed the Supreme Court by claiming there is a “sorry state of the law” in not censoring more religious speech (like “under God”) and that he will “pray for the court’s enlightenment” to rule further against religion.
That decision, including the ridicule, seemed perfect for the Supreme Court to overturn with a strong message to deter disrespectful lower courts, but it declined. A Supreme Court that hears only 75 cases a year and ducks the big ones cannot end the havoc wrought by more than 100 lower courts rendering perhaps 1,000 times as many decisions.
Luckily, a rare Supreme Court decision last term written by Justice Samuel B. Alito was used by an appellate court to dismiss a lawsuit against prayer in the Indiana Legislature. Four months after Alito’s decision dismissing on standing grounds a challenge to President George W. Bush’s faith-based programs, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals relied on it to dismiss a challenge to prayer in Indiana in Hinrichs v. Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Earlier, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also dismissed on standing grounds an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit attempting to prevent the Boy Scouts of America from holding their jamboree on military property.
The results in these cases point the way for Congress to save the Pledge of Allegiance: Withdraw jurisdiction from the courts over acknowledgment-of-God cases by passing the We the People Act, or H.R. 300.
Related special offers:
Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com
URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2007/11/44802/
© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.