In “Christian librarian takes ‘gay’ profs to federal court,” WND reported that former head librarian at Ohio State University-Mansfield, Scott Savage is suing MOSU for violating his First and 14th Amendment rights.

I have been following this case since April 2006, when Savage, a devout Quaker was accused of homophobic “gay” sexual harassment by a unanimous MOSU faculty committee vote, led by English faculty members who held themselves out as experts in human sexuality. Clearly, Alfred Kinsey would be a major cause for such irrational faculty fury.

The faculty, including two openly homosexual teachers were “threatened” they said, by Savage’s suggestion that freshman students read David Kupelian’s well-researched book, “The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom.”

It was Kupelian’s detailed expose of Alfred Kinsey’s frauds and child sexual abuse research protocol in Chapter 6 “Obsessed With Sex: How Fraudulent Science Unleashed a Catastrophic ‘Revolution,'” that triggered this seething faculty wrath.

The faculty announced that Kupelian’s chapter on Alfred Kinsey was false. Moreover, they accused his Kinsey whistleblower, Dr. Judith Reisman, of being a “self-promoting pontificator,” “fringe” “so-called scholar” “deemed incompetent by professional scholars.”

A Townhall commentator remarked of the MOSU faculty. On May 4, 2006, Scott Savage replied, “Hello Judith Reisman. Yes, they hate and fear you at my academy.”


Because, as Kupelian writes, our obsession with sex is grounded in fraudulent science. Fraud means the entire sex “education” establishment, the entire “field” of “human sexuality” is open to legal action for defrauding the state. Now that is a threat that could be serious.

Mr. Savage had forcefully defended me (thus my findings on Kinsey) as having “more scholarly heft than most anyone I know at MOSU.” To this, one faculty member, Norman Jones, wrote:

Jones, representing his own open homosexual bias, is outraged that Kupelian dared broadcast my findings on Kinsey’s world-changing “reports.” Yet, Kinsey is the bi/homosexual sex addict who legitimized sex with children based on “science.” This is the North American Man/Boy Love Association, or NAMBLA, spiritual leader: “Gay liberationists in general and boy-lovers in particular, should know Kinsey’s work and hold it dear” … “implicit in Kinsey is the struggle we fight today.” (NAMBLA leader Tom Reeve in THE AGE TABOO, 1981)

One Amazon reader writes of “The Marketing of Evil” that “The chapter on Kinsey and the selling of sex in America is a true eye opener and worth the price of the book by itself.” Another says, “Again, his nauseating descriptions of Alfred Kinsey’s behavior, though incredible, only scratch the surface of the man’s depravity.”

The Other Prom Court, 2004

Speaking of recruitment, underage children are targeted by the MOSU “Gay Straight Alliance” and its faculty advisers. Above is an MOSU photo advertising “The other prom is free … open to youth 14-22 years old.” Elsewhere youngsters are told that “The GSA Summit is open to all gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or questioning youth and their allies aged 20 and under.” How young is “under” aged 20 (and who invites 14-year-olds to party with adults)?

More on the MOSU “mentor” program for children age 14, or for those “20 and under” will be provided in later articles on this case. The MOSU recruitment of immature youths into their sexually freighted atmosphere renders the “party” invitations, and the “mentoring” of youngsters by “queer” MOSU specialists, more than suspect.

Several normal high schools have canceled their prom nights due to the off-site drinking and sexual promiscuity too common at these events. MOSU’s invitation to junior or senior high schoolers to “party” with adult gays, etc., would suggest to some cynics, brazen child sexual recruitment.

Obviously, MOSU profs would defame the whistleblower of Kinsey’s deliberate frauds and depraved child sex crimes, “the so-called expert you cite in favor of this book.” Posing as a scholar, Jones states that Kupelian’s definition of Kinsey as a “sexual psychopath” departs from the accuracy typically expected of scholarship.”
However, the police blotter “sex offender” registration code defines a “sexual psychopath” as “a person, not insane, who by a course of repeated misconduct in sexual matters has evidenced such lack of power to control his or her sexual impulses as to be dangerous to other persons because he or she is likely to attack or otherwise inflict injury, loss, pain or other evil on the objects of his or her desire.”

Although the religion defense is certainly appropriate in the Savage case, I keep waiting for a bold legal group to sue our universities and schools for soliciting and accepting state and federal funds to teach and perpetrate Kinsey’s human sexuality frauds.


Special offer:

“The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom”

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.