Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. – Psalm 82:3
To do justice and judgment is more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice. – Proverbs 21:3
What beautiful scripture verses. The Bible is filled with verses that call on us to do all in our power as individuals to fight what is unjust and to show His mercy on the oppressed, downtrodden and broken-hearted.
But it is in such powerful callings that appeal to what is highest and best in us that the forces of evil often insidiously weave in their lies and hatred, perverting the meaning of the lovely words. Satan doesn’t usually come to us through red cloak and dagger with flaming horns and hatred spewing from his mouth. He most often takes on the form, as the Bible warns us, of an “angel of light.”
The latest such successful attempt to spread hatred and violence has been to take that wonderful call to “justice” and insert one word in front of it that makes it “better” – as in, “social justice.”
The left has long been a master of the use of verbiage and language. Who could be against “choice,” for instance? We all want more “choices,” right?
The reality is that the attractive word of “choice” was cleverly chosen to hide the ugliness of what the choice is about – allowing mothers to freely kill their pre-born babies. (Watch for decent Americans everywhere to be swept up in the coming months – without ever critically thinking about it – into supporting one of President Obama’s favorite government decrees, the “Freedom of Choice Act,” which would wipe out all parental notification, parental consent and informed consent laws passed on the state level.) It’s so much easier in this busy world just to nod in agreement to lovely sounding terms than it is to painfully look beyond the headlines and clever jargon and discover the demons underneath the pretty packaging. After all, if you find evil, then you have to stop and fight it, right? Most prefer the peaceful life of ignorance.
David Kupelian, managing editor of WorldNetDaily.com, wrote one of the best books I’ve ever seen on how the left uses clever wording and deceptive language to market their socialist ideas. It’s a must-read for anyone scratching their heads over how those who believe in traditional Judeo-Christian values seem to always be playing catch-up in the war of ideas. In “The Marketing of Evil,” Kupelian painstakingly documents the process and practices the left has mastered to dupe good Americans into carrying the poisonous waters of socialism, immorality and … just plain evil.
Which brings me back to the now popular term, “social justice.” The combination of these words makes one feel so good. But it’s time to pull back the curtain and find out what the term has come to mean, how it has been able to gain such massive popularity and who is behind it.
Can you say, “William Ayers”?
Yes, that William Ayers. The same guy that planted bombs in the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol as part of his efforts to use hatred and violence to overthrow the free-market system and replace it with a socialist one through his now infamous organization, “Weather Underground.” Government officials basically botched the investigation against him through the improper collection of evidence, and Ayers walked away from his terrorist activities a free man. Later he proudly exclaimed, “Guilty as hell. Free as a bird.”
Knowing that decent Americans were growing weary of the radical protests by liberals in the ’60s and ’70s, Ayers cleverly decided to adopt a new tactic for the spreading of his socialist agenda: Use the massive government education system. Ayers knew that 89 percent of America’s children are educated in the government schools. He knew that parents are often all-too-willing to just hand their kids over to “professional educators” eight hours a day without ever bothering to read their textbooks.
He knew that many of the people who go into education do so with altruistic motives, and that if you capture them as young adults in education colleges you can easily warp their thinking. He knew that the teachers’ union (NEA) is an incredibly left-leaning organization that pressures all teachers to follow the “status quo.” He knew how easy it is to manipulate the hearts and minds of boys and girls who will be in the system the majority of their waking hours throughout their formative years. Yes, the path was very clear: systematically indoctrinate teachers through educational training programs and the books you give them, and you can use them to then produce an army of young men and women to carry forth revolution in just one generation.
So, as Phyllis Schlafly documents in The Phyllis Schlafly Report, (available at www.eagleforum.org), “Ayers enrolled in Columbia Teachers College where he picked up a Ph.D., and emerged as a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago.” Since then, his influence in education has been remarkable – which, of course, has made him incredibly influential in the culture at large, and especially among today’s young adults – without their even knowing it. The Manhattan Institute’s Sol Stern has said that William Ayers is one of the leaders in “bringing radical social-justice teaching into our public school classrooms.”
The 2008 election saw that the young people in evangelical churches had been duped by the teaching of Ayers and company’s brand of “social justice.” A whopping 32 percent of 18-29-year-old evangelicals voted for Barack Obama even though he advocates abortion on demand, including the killing of babies who have survived botched abortions. What was the attraction? Many of them listed Obama’s concern for “social justice” as the reason for supporting the senator who would be savior. Among all 18-29-year-old voters, 2008 post-elections surveys reveal that a full 70 percent of them favor expanding the role of government and want the federal government to be more active.
What is Ayers’ brand of “social justice” that now permeates our schools and society at large? It is a perversion of what Scripture calls for. If you read his text books and those of his compatriots, you know that he uses the term to call for overthrowing the free-market system – which affords equal opportunity for everyone – and replacing it with a system that forces the “redistribution of wealth” – and he’s not afraid to use violence, hatred and class warfare to do it. He believes that America as a nation is today unjust and oppressive. He freely admits that he is a “communist street fighter.” His courses, recommended books (such as “Queering Elementary Education”) and theories are now widely adopted at teachers colleges around the country.
Part of Ayers’ success has been to first teach such messages of hatred and racism in inner-city schools. But like everything else, from the spread of violent rap music, to the “gangsta clothing” styles and the attitudes that go with them, to the problems of out-of-wedlock sex and pregnancy, when you take advantage of disadvantaged kids and feed the problems, those ills eventually spread into the suburban communities as well. (Star Parker, the founder of CURE – the Coalition for Urban Renewal and Education, is an expert on the subject of how “The legacy of American socialism is our blighted inner-cities, dysfunctional inner-city schools, and broken black families.” She has also writes and speaks extensively on how such problems eventually spread throughout all of American culture.)
So, the next time you hear the phrase, “social justice,” take time to question the one who is using it, and challenge him or her to read some of the resources I have mentioned above. Maybe their motives are pure and they are using the word “justice” in its classic, biblical sense. But chances are they have no idea that the vision of justice that has taken their hearts captive was perpetrated by a terrorist who is using their good will to spread his hatred and to bring forth a more authoritative government where the individual is held captive to a few elitists with ultimate power.