- WND - http://www.wnd.com -
Debate could target White House job offers
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 06/22/2010 @ 9:43 pm In Front Page | Comments Disabled
There could be debate in Congress as early as this week on just exactly what happened in the apparent job offers by the White House to two Democrats who were challenging incumbent senators favored by President Obama.
Republicans on the Judiciary Committee have filed a Resolution of Inquiry that seeks information about what role the Justice Department may have played in the offers to Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa., and Andrew Romanoff, the former speaker of the Colorado House.
“House Democrats face a simple question, they can join with us in holding the Obama administration to the very standard of transparency they set for themselves or they can condone a White House intent on manipulating elections by any means necessary,” said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.
Issa has sent letters to William F. Reukauf, associate special counsel in the Hatch Act Unit of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, asking for an investigation of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Jim Messina, a deputy, who allegedly made the offers to Sestak and Romanoff.
The issue is that federal officials are barred from offering anything of value, such as a job, in exchange for a partisan political decision, such as bowing out of a campaign for office.
Issa’s investigation requests were followed by similar requests regarding the cases by Judicial Watch, a nonpartisan public-interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption.
The allegations are that Emanuel and Messia tried to interfere in Senate primaries in Pennsylvania and Colorado by offering federal jobs to Sestak and Romanoff to clear the field for Sens. Arlen Specter and Michael Bennet.
According to Issa, who has spearheaded the investigation, the Judiciary Committee will debate the resolution offered by ranking member Lamar Smith, R-Texas. If approved, it would require the Justice Department to provide all requested documents to Congress.
Issa noted Emanuel had told a television interviewer there is “nothing more that’s needed” to disclose about dispatching former President Bill Clinton to offer Sestak an unpaid position he could not accept in return for his withdrawal from the primary against Specter.
“If they have nothing to hide and did nothing wrong, there is no reason why the White House or House Democrats should not welcome the full release of information collected in the White House’s investigation of itself so they can clear the air once and for all,” Issa said.
The White House earlier released a statement that it had investigated allegations officials there acted improperly and found nothing wrong.
“The very memo Rahm Emanuel says exonerates the White House only served to raise additional questions regarding the White House’s role in pressuring Adm. Sestak out of the Pennsylvania Senate primary,” said Issa.
The resolution itself asks for “copies of certain communications relating to certain recommendations regarding administration appointments.”
It seeks “any guidance or recommendations made by the Department … regarding discussions of administration appointments by White House staff, or persons acting on behalf of White House staff, with any candidate for public office in exchange for such candidate’s withdrawal from any election.”
“Top Obama White House officials attempted to manipulate federal elections in at least two states, which is a clear violation of the law,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “An investigation by the Office of Special Counsel is a first step.
“It is an absolute disgrace that Attorney General [Eric] Holder has not appointed a special counsel to investigate these scandals. And the fact that Congress is largely silent on this serious Obama scandal is one more reason why the public holds it in such low esteem,” he said when his organization stepped into the dispute.
Sestak said the White House job offer came last July as he was preparing to formally announce his Senate candidacy in August.
Sestak’s account “is prima facie evidence that an individual in the White House violated the Hatch Act’s prohibition against using official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election,” Issa asserted in his letter demanding an investigation.
Further, the facts later were confirmed by the White House, Issa charged.
A letter from a White House attorney said the congressman “publicly and accurately stated” that “options for executive-branch service were raised with him. Efforts were made in June and July of 2009 to determine whether Congressman Sestak would be interested in service on a presidential or other senior executive-branch advisory board, which would avoid a divisive Senate primary.”
“The Hatch Act prohibition on using official authority or influence for the purpose of affecting the result of an election extends to the White House chief of staff,” Issa said at the time. “Only the president and vice president are exempted. … The Hatch Act covers all officials of the executive agencies and departments, even agency and department heads appointed by the president with advice and consent of the Senate, as well as all officials, staff and aides in the offices of the president and vice president.”
Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, who retired as deputy commanding general for the Pacific, has called on Obama to resign, at least partly because of the job offers.
“We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government,” he said.
Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com
URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2010/06/169857/
© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.