DOCTOR'S ORDERSWorldNetDaily
'Undead Zombie Option' resurrected in Congress
Can anything permanently slay monster Americans don't want?

Like the gauze-wrapped creatures who just won’t stay dead in those late-night movies you’re too tired to turn off, the “public option” has returned to Washington.
An analysis by Investor’s Business Daily, which called it the “Zombie Option,” said the idea – rejected in debate over the health-care plan signed into law earlier this year – is being promoted yet again as a way to save the government money.
Democratic Reps. Lynn Woolsey and Pete Stark of California and Jan Schakowsky of Illinois have joined to put together the newest proposal, called the “public-option act.”
It was only a few days ago when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told a Las Vegas convention, “We’re going to have a public option. It’s a question of when,” according to Investor’s Business Daily.
The plan by that time already was proposed on paper, and it now has 128 House Democratic Party co-sponsors, the report said.
Get “Taking America Back,” Joseph Farah’s manifesto for sovereignty, self-reliance and moral renewal
The proposal states: “For years beginning with 2014, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this subtitle referred to as the ‘Secretary’) shall provide for the offering through Exchanges established under this title of a health benefits plan (in this Act referred to as the ‘public health insurance option’) that ensures choice, competition and stability of affordable, high-quality coverage throughout the United States in accordance with this section. In designing the option, the Secretary’s primary responsibility is to create a low-cost plan without compromising quality or access to care.”
Investor’s Business Daily commentary said Schakowsky claims it would be a cost-saving measure, just like Medicare.
“Is that the same Medicare that in 1966 was only supposed to cost $3 billion, and that the House Ways and Means Committee once assured the country would only cost $12 billion by 1990? Is it the same program that really ended up costing $600 billion by 2008?” the commentary wondered.
Investor’s Business Daily noted Obamacare itself is a “stepping stone” to the format of a public option.
“As Kathryn Nix of the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Health Policy Studies noted Wednesday, the Office of Personnel Management will be authorized to administer health plans,” the commentary said. The office “‘would set benefits, premiums and medical-loss ratios for these plans, and there’s nothing on the books to stop the agency from modeling the plans after a public option. Worse yet,’ she adds, Obamacare ‘says nothing about any solvency requirements for’” the Office of Personnel Management–run plans.
The Washington Independent reported Woolsey’s opinion that the program “can save billions of dollars and improve health care while doing it.”
The bill’s supporters claim the low cost of running a government program would be good for consumers because it would force private carriers to lower their costs also. The Congressional Budget Office forecasts it might reduce the government’s budget deficit $68 billion within 10 years.
However, the Independent report said there would be strong objections from private insurance companies, and the actual vote on the plan isn’t expected during this Congress.
A House Democratic aide told the Independent the next Congress could take it up.
In a forum section at the Independent, consumers weren’t quite ready to believe that the congressional creation of another massive government program would help.
“What a crock … every time the CBO comes out and sez, ‘This program will save the taxpayers $ XXX billions of dollars’; AND THEN a few months later come out a[nd] tell us it is going to COST taxpayers billions of dollars,” wrote one participant.
Sign a petition opposing Obamacare.
Special offers:
Summer sizzle: Obamacare could be repealed before election
Get “Taking America Back,” Joseph Farah’s manifesto for sovereignty, self-reliance and moral renewal
Related stories:
Obamacare reversal? House 75% of the way there!
Obamacare repeal? 150 House signatures already
8 more in Congress sign on for Obamacare repeal
Demand for revote on Obamacare surges
U.S. House plan overturning Obamacare halfway there
Report: Failing grade for Obamacare
‘Flawed’ Obamacare called ‘unconstitutional’
Was Obamacare designed for ‘distribution of wealth’?
Obamacare hospitals killed: 60, with 200 on life support
Uncovered: Obama’s mystery college years
L.A. Times smears exposé outing president
Obama can’t shake ‘Manchurian President’ pursuit
Did Obama hide damning health-care report?
Government health care a 4-letter word: W-a-i-t
Health-care mandates could be ‘null and void’
Microchips in Obamacare? Not yet
Injunction sought to halt Obamacare
Does your faith free you from forced Obamacare?
Did you feel that hit in your wallet?
Obama ridicules health-care law critics
Citizens sue feds to block Obamacare
Federal health care? Not so fast, say states
Bloody Sunday, 2010: House OKs health bill
America denounces ‘Obamacare’ threat
President: Obamacare deals ‘privileged’
‘Don’t count on courts to uphold Constitution’
Anger at Washington reaches full throttle
Health-care ‘trickery’ called overthrow of Constitution
Levin: We will sue over health-care trick
Code Red! Americans fight to crush Obamacare
‘Backroom deals’ details wanted, now!
Washington firebrand: ‘Health care’ is ‘fraud’
New promise: Lawsuits to challenge ‘Obamacare’
Obama sued for secret abortion meetings
Author exposes ‘seedy underbelly of Washington’
Corruption fighter: ‘I’ve never seen it like this’
Judicial Watch founder flays Washington
Hollywood: Withhold sex to push health reform
Jessica Alba’s seduce-the-vote campaign
Half of voters oppose Congress members on health care
Union members oppose key Obamacare points
Citizens on government health care say ‘no more’
Poll: Americans agree on health insurance
Click here to print.
