• Text smaller
  • Text bigger

Consider the recent WND report on Scotland’s opening up internet pornography to school children at lunch break thanks to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, currently un-ratified by the repressed USA.

The U.N. “child rights” includes conditioning children to “consensual” prostitution and pornography, and the “right” to be used by any scoundrel they “chose.” Protesting parents risk jail or the loony bin.

Although the 2010 U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child language avoids the incendiary language of past years, the same child sex sale apparatus applies.

“Article 1 (Definition of the child): The Convention defines a ‘child’ as a person below the age of 18, unless the laws of a particular country set the legal age for adulthood younger …” This deliberately allows any age child to be redefined as adult.

Translation: Countries with legal prostitution or pornography and younger “age of adulthood,” can sell legal child prostitution/pornography. “Rights” authors know adulthood may become any age, depending on the age of the partner(s). Spain’s age of consent is now 13, pornography legal and prostitution effectively legal.

Article 17 says: “(Access to information; mass media): Children have the right to get information that is important to their health and well-being …”

Much international pornographic and fraudulent Planned Parenthood material masqueraded as sex education and AIDS prevention are said to be good for children’s “health and well being.” Similarly, “children’s books” lie and sexually violate the child reader.

Article 13 is the pornography access act: “The child shall have the right to freedom of expression … [to] receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the child’s choice.”

So a Scottish pedophile educator organizes access to “all” media for any age, one to 18. Free “expression … regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media,” it’s a child’s choice.

Article 15 gives children of any age “freedom of association and to freedom of peaceful assembly. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of these rights” if they are legal and don’t violate public safety, etc. It is illegal for parents to stop children from bad actions, etc. Billions can be made via these child “protective” articles.

Article 16: allows the lockup for parents who interfere with a pimp for children are protected against “arbitrary or unlawful interference with his or her privacy … honour and reputation.”

Article 24 provides “health care” family planning education and services, “abolishing traditional practices prejudicial to the health of children.”

Translation: child contraception, venereal vaccination and abortion as child “protections” in international care documents

No “rights” identify sexually graphic images as “materials that could harm children.”

UNICEF folks as all good guys? In the Spring 1991 issue of the Journal of Pedophilia, the author laments the conviction of UNICEF’s Belgian director for the child rape, torture, prostitution and pornography in the U.N. cellar lab. Pedophiles protested that, “Since the Dutroux [UNICEF] affaire in Belgium, television and the newspapers are full with news about pedophilia in a pejorative and negative way.”

Gosh, no American newspapers. Although the conviction of a notorious pedophile ring that regularly assaulted children in the official UNICEF basement could be of significant interest to Americans, neither UNICEF nor the U.S. press found this “news fit to print,” protecting UNICEF’s image and income.

UNICEF has provided basic nutrition, water safety, sanitation, emergency services and the three Rs. However, UNICEF’s “children’s sexual rights” means the fox is guarding the chicken coop and eating well.

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.