Talk about your proverbial can of worms. It is now clear that Barack Hussein Obama Sr.’s immigration file was the impetus for President Obama to release his “long form” last week. If he thought that release would put the matter to rest, it has had the opposite effect. It has all raised more questions than it answered, as does the release of shocking revelations in his father’s immigration file.
The release of Barack Hussein Obama I’s immigration file is stunning in what it reveals and the questions it poses. BHO I’s visa expired Aug. 8, 1961 (Barack Junior was born Aug. 4, 1961) – is that why he married Obama’s mother? Stanley Ann Dunham was a white girl in a family way with a mixed-race child, desperate for legitimacy in a culture that condemned such behavior as abject immorality, and Barack Obama Sr. was a con man from Kenya desperate to stay in the USA. Was the marriage merely a business arrangement (she was 17 when she got pregnant)? Is that why it was so important to place the ads in the Hawaiian papers announcing the birth of the future president – because his father was about to be deported?
Stanley Ann Dunham could not have been so savvy as to know that BHO I was a Muslim polygamist. Yet clearly, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., was never divorced from his first wife in Kenya. The Immigration and Naturalization Service suspected that the elder Obama’s marriage to Dunham was a sham, arranged strictly to secure immigration status for him. Despite the fact that BHO I had married Dunham, the government wasn’t buying it: An INS official wrote in 1961 that the agency should “make sure an investigation is conducted as to the bona-fide of the marriage.”
And it bears mentioning that BHO I did not marry a different high-school minor whom he impregnated, according to these documents; most probably she went to London for an abortion. But he married Stanley Ann Dunham – why? Immigration status. Obama Sr. was a Kenyan citizen. Kenya was still under English law at this time. But if Barack Sr. was a Muslim polygamist, his “marriage” to Stanley Ann Dunham was invalid.
An INS investigator wrote on June 8, 1964: “They (Harvard officials) weren’t very impressed with him and asked us to hold up action on his application until they decided what action they could take in order to get rid of him. They were apparently having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn’t seem to figure out how many wives he had.”
It is interesting to note that BHO I claims in the documents to have divorced first wife, Kezia, “verbally.” According to the Shariah, a man can divorce his wife by repeating it three times. Further, when BHO I returned to Kenya, he apparently lived with his first Kenyan wife and his American third wife, suggesting that the “divorce” he ostensibly secured to marry Dunham was a transitory ruse.
That would make the president illegitimate. In 1787, illegitimate children had different rights. There is no way the founders of this great nation intended for an illegitimate child of a foreign bigamist to attain the highest, most powerful position in the new land.
All this means that President Barack Hussein Obama is not natural born. His father was not a U.S. citizen; he is, by that very fact, disqualified to serve as president of the United States. Those who believe that the “natural born” requirement is no longer relevant in our modern age are wrong. The Founding Fathers added this to the requirements for someone serving as president to make it difficult for a spy or traitor to attain the highest office in the land. Clearly, from Obama’s performance, this is a considerable cause for concern.
For years, the media and the left have excoriated anyone who questioned the circumstances and events surrounding the birth of the president of the United States. The lack of transparency and honesty only gave rise to more suspicion. And rightly so. One doesn’t hand over the reins of power to just anyone, particularly those with an unknown or sketchy past. The dearth of documentation and paperwork led to more speculation. The American people were like Helen Keller, and the Obama machine kept moving the furniture. Who is this man, and what is he hiding?
The birth-certificate issue became the rallying cry for those of us who questioned the legitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility for the Oval Office. Our media did not vet the president during his campaign. In fact, they took it upon themselves to destroy and smear those who did, or tried to. The Boston Globe got the immigration file in 2009; why did they sit on it?
Despite their best efforts, however, the story of Obama’s questionable origins wouldn’t die. And so last Wednesday, Barack Obama finally released what he said was the long form of his birth certificate. As more and more questionable features of this document have come out, it looks as if another exhaustive digital forensic examination is in order.
And so the question is: Why release an “abstract” document so obviously tampered with?
Obama Sr. had a British passport, as Kenya did not achieve independence until Dec. 12, 1963. The United States Immigration and Naturalization Service record clearly states on more than one occasion that BHO Sr. was “British,” so the entry on his Hawaiian “birth certificate” that describes the father as “African” is highly suspicious for that – and because if race were the qualifier, he would have been described as “Negro.”
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
As Obama continues to toy with and taunt the American people, you have to scratch your head and say, what took him so long to release this apparently innocuous document? And why? Why is Obama gas-lighting the American people? Why is Obama toying with, gaming the American people?
In the summer of 2009, I wrote this about the birth-certificate controversy: “I suspect that the administration has a hot little document that will wash away Obama’s sins and make the concern about this issue look silly. … In what could be considered a psyop on the American people, the birth-certificate issue is being used to smear the Republicans in general as ‘birthers,’ conspiracy nuts who have given themselves over to right-wing nuttery.”
In the aftermath of Wednesday’s release of Obama’s ostensible “long form,” we have seen just that scenario unfolding.
If Obama had this “long form” document all along, why didn’t he release it when the controversy first began? Back in June and July of 2008, I broke the story of how the first birth document Obama produced, the Certification of Live Birth that he posted to his farcically titled blog, “Fight the Smears,” was an altered document. This was demonstrated by a digital forensic examination specialist, an active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, the American College of Forensic Examiners, the International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, the International Information Systems Forensics Association – the list goes on. He was also board certified as a forensic computer examiner, a certificated legal investigator and a licensed private investigator. He had been performing computer-based forensic investigations since 1993 (although back then it did not even have a formal name yet), and he had performed countless investigations since then.
He submitted his findings to my website, AtlasShrugs.com. We welcomed peer review. No one would touch the story. I said then, as I say now, that I have no idea what is on Obama’s genuine long form, but it is mighty peculiar that a president of the United States would hold out so long, refuse to release it for so long and then finally release such a questionable document. I mean, really.
The questions about Obama’s birth certificate were real, as Obama has now tacitly admitted by releasing the new document. The American people have a right to know who and what is serving them at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Every other president has released every document, school record, passport, military record, school transcript, ad infinitum. The media are not interested, but the American people need to know: Where are Obama’s Occidental College records; his Columbia College records; his Columbia thesis paper; his Harvard records; his Selective Service registration; his medical records; his Illinois State Senate records; his Illinois State Senate schedule; his law practice client list; his Harvard Law Review articles that were published; his University of Chicago scholarly articles; and his baptismal record?â€¨
We owe Donald Trump a debt of gratitude.
Pamela Geller is the editor and publisher of Atlas Shrugs and author of “The Post-American Presidency, the Obama Administration’s War on America.”