I am a born-again Christian Baptist and for the most part I appreciate your [news site]. But it seems like many ministries and conservative news outlets, including ones like yours, are stuck in the "lesser of two evils" mindset and are implying (though not directly endorsing) that Romney is the more conservative choice). I guess it depends on how one defines "conservative."
Reagan said that "the heart of conservatism is libertarianism," and history shows that Baptist like John Leland, Isaac Backus and many of our Founding Fathers believed that being a conservative meant fighting for liberty ... for ALL, even those that have lifestyles different from theirs. So if being a conservative means fighting for liberty, then neither Romney nor Obama fit, regardless of how their rhetoric may be different, with one using more Christian/conservative terminology more than the other.
Most biblical Christians wouldn't consider voting for Obama, and rightfully so, but they need to take a second look at Romney before they "pull the lever" and pick him as their choice.
Romney, like Obama, supports the NDAA, which essentially takes away our freedoms and which I'm sure will be used by the Antichrist to hunt down Christians who refused to take his mark.
Many Chrisitans are just are too quick to fall for Romney's rhetoric because he speaks more "Christianese." He uses more conservative Christian terminology than Obama.
I'm sure you'll agree that talk is cheap. The Bible tells us that "by their fruit ye shall know them" (Matthew 7:20). We are to judge a politician or a preacher not by his rhetoric (the words he uses) but by his fruit (his actions).
Mitt Romey isn't a conservative, but he is a good actor. He only appears to be conservative for political gain.
Any Christian or ministry supporting Romney isn't thinking critically or biblically.
Jay Ricci