- WND - http://www.wnd.com -
Win or lose, Obama was not and is not the president
Posted By Lord Monckton On 11/06/2012 @ 9:29 pm In Commentary,Opinion | No Comments
As I write, it is not yet clear who has won the presidential election. Win or lose, though, Mr Obama was not and is not the president. The Hawaiian long-form “birth certificate” he publicly endorsed and posted at the White House website last year as proof that he was born in the jurisdiction of the U.S. and is thus constitutionally eligible to be president is a forgery.
I can prove it.
I have been asked to prepare an affidavit in one of the 80 court cases U.S. citizens have filed in the hope of persuading someone – anyone – in office to lift a trembling, liver-spotted finger and do something about the forgery.
The affidavit, which I shall be swearing today, is posted here, with the written permission of the plaintiff’s attorney.
In very simple language, the affidavit explains how mathematicians apply probability theory to determine the probability that suspect documents are genuine.
The diligent, unpaid heroes who have been investigating the dodgy document for more than a year on behalf of the people of Maricopa County, Ariz., have found a long list of irregularities in Mr. Obama’s identification documents.
I have used the investigators’ list to draw up a schedule of probabilities – one for each individual irregularity. The probability that the “birth certificate” and other Obama identity documents are genuine is just 1 in 75 sextillion.
I have used this method to catch con men before. I used it to demonstrate that Al Gore’s sci-fi movie was political, not scientific. The High Court in London ordered Britain’s Education Department to issue 77 pages of corrective guidance before the movie could be shown to innocent pupils.
If a document is genuine, its few irregularities will all be independent of one another. However, if a document is forged, there will be many irregularities connected by the forger’s intent to deceive.
The probability of a series of genuinely independent irregularities occurring by chance is the product of the probabilities of each individual irregularity. One lists the individual probabilities and multiplies them together.
Why does this work? Toss 10 unbiased silver dollars into the air. What is the probability that all 10 will show heads? The probability that one coin will show heads is 1 in 2. With two coins there are four possibilities: TT, TH, HT, HH. So the probability that HH will show is 1 in 4.
For three coins the possibilities are TTT, TTH, THT, THH, HTT, HTH, HHT, HHH. The probability that all three coins will land heads-up is thus 1 in 8, and so on.
In general, the probability that n coins will all show heads when they land is 1 in 2 raised to the nth power. So all 10 coins will land heads-up less than once in 1,000 throws.
Forensic investigators have identified at least 13 distinct irregularities in Mr Obama’s “birth certificate” and at least another 3 irregularities in his other identification documents. If these irregularities were genuine, they would be independent of one another.
So, even if we were to assume (impossibly) that there was as much as a 50:50 chance that each irregularity might occur, the probability that all of the irregularities might have occurred by accident in relation to one individual cannot be more than 1 in 65,000.
Whichever way you stack it, the “birth certificate” is as phony as a 3-dollar bill. But the entire Republican Party is asleep at the switch (as usual). It would only take one senator or congressman to raise an objection during the joint session mandated by the Constitution for confirming the election results.
Then, at last, the kim-chee would interface with the rotatory convector. To mix a culinary metaphor or two, the kipper behind the radiator would be exposed, and Obama, with egg all over his face, would be out of the frying pan and into the fire. He would be toast and would stew in his own juice behind bars for decades.
But, having talked to one or two members of Congress, I am not holding my breath. No one seems to want to put an end to the putrid, in-your-face corruption that is the non-presidency of 2009-2012.
John Carroll, a leading attorney and former state senator from Hawaii, has written to every congressman and every senator asking them to do their duty. Not one has even replied.
John and others have written to the Secret Service. Its head has not replied, though it is his job to investigate the authenticity of identity documents. No replies from the head of the FBI, all members of the Cabinet and nearly all secretaries of state, attorneys general and governors.
Till now, though, these bumblocrats have not been confronted with sworn testimony. This is where you come in. Write to your congressman, to both senators, to your state’s governor, AG and secretary of state, demanding that Mr Obama’s birth narrative be investigated as fraudulent. And send them copies of my affidavit.
Email me via WND to say you have acted. I am gathering proof that various senior officers of state have been told of the Obama corruption and have failed to do their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.
The investigators are closing in. When prosecutions begin (and it is “when,” not “if”), those who failed to honor their oaths of office will be in the crowded dock alongside Obama as accessories after the fact of forgery, fraud and – let us not mince words – high treason.
Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com
URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/win-or-lose-obama-was-not-and-is-not-the-president/
© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.