Limbaugh questions the predictions of calamity if sequestration budget cuts go into effect.
“I can’t help but think that we are all being played for a bunch of fools, a bunch of suckers on this sequester business. I don’t know. Are you like me? Do you really think 800,000 people are gonna lose their jobs in the Pentagon because we cut $22 billion? Do you really think air traffic control’s gonna shut down? Do you really think there aren’t gonna be any meat inspectors? Do you really think that all of these horror stories are going to happen? I don’t.”
He blames the practice of baseline budgeting.
“There is no real cut below a baseline of zero. There just isn’t. Yet here they come, sucking us in, roping us in. Panic here, fear there: Crisis, destruction, no meat inspection, no cops, no teachers, no firefighters, no air traffic control. I’m sorry, my days of getting roped into all this are over. We have the media playing along with all this. The ruling class of both parties play along with all this. It’s insulting. I don’t know how else to describe it.”
“What’s happening here, folks, is we are being played for fools and being suckered — suckered into supporting the never-ending expansion of government, the wholesale destruction of the private economy. Everybody who joins in this debate under the premise that Obama puts forth, as well as debating the politics of this nonsense, is just being used to cover up what’s actually going on. Now, what’s going on is no great conspiracy. It’s no mystery. We’re spending much more money than we have.”
Limbaugh says, “I feel like I’ve been here. This is deja vu all over again. I remember the 1995 budget battle. That involved a legitimate government shut down. That wasn’t just $22 billion we were not gonna spend. We’re still gonna spend $3.5 trillion. We’re just not gonna spend $22 billion, if it happens.”
“Everything gets repeated. The cycle, the claims, the threats, the crisis, Armageddon, it’s the same. And we’re talking $22 billion. It’s not as though we’re not gonna spend anything. If the sequester happens, the first year is $44 billion. Half of that’s defense. We’re still going to spend $3.5 trillion or $3.3 trillion, even if we don’t spend the $22 billion.”
“It is the same threats. It’s the same danger. It’s the same crisis. It’s identical. There’s nothing about it that changes, over and over. And everybody gets sucked into it. I try to escape, I try to get out of it, I try to leave it aside, I try to move on, but it just sucks me back in, too, until I realize that I have been sucked back in.”
Limbaugh says an article by Ron Fournier at the National Journal unknowingly proves his point, it’s not about politics.
“Mr. Fournier writes, ‘If it’s all about politics, bully for Obama’ but “[i]f it’s about governing, the story changes” for Obama.’ Yes, siree, Bob. That’s my whole point. ‘You see,’ as Mr. Fournier writes, totally unaware that he’s totally confirming my brilliant theorem of last week, ‘If it’s about governing, then the story changes for Obama.'”
Limbaugh further quotes Fournier, “in any enterprise, the chief executive is ultimately accountable for success and failure. Sure, blame Congress — castigate all 535 lawmakers, or the roughly half you hate. But there is only one president. Even if he’s right on the merits, Obama may be on the wrong side of history. Fair or not, the president owns this mess.”
But Limbaugh takes it a step further. “Mr. Fournier, I disagree with you. He doesn’t. That is the whole point. The president does not own this mess. His approval rating wouldn’t be 55 percent if he owned this mess.”
“He is not governing, Mr. Fournier. You’ve stumbled into this and I’m here to alert you how right you are. You don’t even know it. He’s not governing. It’s all about politics. Congress is being blamed for this. The Republicans are being blamed. Obama is just the outsider trying to fix it all.”
Limbaugh says its an “insulting joke to everybody. This is an embarrassing spectacle. After 1995, 1993, whatever, I’m getting tired of it. I’m worn out. It’s history repeating it’s over and over and over, almost verbatim, from “taking food out of the mouths of children,” to “they’re coming for our children” to “No meat inspectors!” They’re even saying have to close down the sleigh rides in Jellystone Park! That has come up again, like it did in the 1995 budget battle.
“It’s the same stuff. It’s the same threats. It’s the same arguments over and over. Nothing ever changes! We just keep spending more money. We create more dependency, we get more and more irresponsible from one crisis to the next, all of them manufactured.”
“Except for the real crisis, which nobody ever addresses, and that is: We can’t afford any of this.”
Limbaugh does see a glimmer of hope. “The American public needs to learn that the sun will rise. That’s what we need to learn: That the sun will still rise and the sky will still be blue and the birds are still gonna chirp after this sequester if it happens.”
Laments lack of fiscal discipline, media coverage of budget negotiations ...more
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist, author Karen Schatzline
Exclusive: David Rives notes sense of smell incredible testimony to design of Creator
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds people what is truly fearful
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Adrian Beale and Adam Thompson
Exclusive: David Rives explains astounding structure's only possible explanation
Exclusive: Richard Rives pegs Protestant influences
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, apostolic leader, senior pastor Kynan Bridges
Exclusive: David Rives notes if you want to see better in the dark, don't look to evolution for answer
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us of what sin really is
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews speaker, business, political strategist Lance Wallnau
Exclusive: David Rives notes 4th dimension applies directly to God
Exclusive: Richard Rives remembers Constantine's influence on making change
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews prophetic minister Shawn Bolz
Exclusive: David Rives notes laws of nature only work with a designed universe
Exclusive: Richard Rives notes dangers of deciding right and wrong for ourselves
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist Joan Gieson
Exclusive: David Rives notes evolutionists have no logical explanation for 2nd plant's opposite rotations
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, speaker Kevin Zadai
Exclusive: David Rives notes long-ages view fails to explain the evidence
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, speaker Dawna De Silva
Exclusive: David Rives notes space phenomenon not a problem in Biblical chronology
Exclusive: Richard Rives notes Jesus did not die so we may practice sin
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Mark Taylor, Mary Colbert
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds believers God's commandments are not 'legalistic'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Jim Woodford
Exclusive: David Rives offers simple explanation for thorny question of stellar evolution
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against 'walking mournfully before the Lord of Hosts'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Messianic rabbi, biblical scholar Jonathan Cahn
Exclusive: David Rives notes science can't explain 'game changer' presence of ancient soft tissue
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns our Creator's commandments are sure