Limbaugh questions the predictions of calamity if sequestration budget cuts go into effect.
“I can’t help but think that we are all being played for a bunch of fools, a bunch of suckers on this sequester business. I don’t know. Are you like me? Do you really think 800,000 people are gonna lose their jobs in the Pentagon because we cut $22 billion? Do you really think air traffic control’s gonna shut down? Do you really think there aren’t gonna be any meat inspectors? Do you really think that all of these horror stories are going to happen? I don’t.”
He blames the practice of baseline budgeting.
“There is no real cut below a baseline of zero. There just isn’t. Yet here they come, sucking us in, roping us in. Panic here, fear there: Crisis, destruction, no meat inspection, no cops, no teachers, no firefighters, no air traffic control. I’m sorry, my days of getting roped into all this are over. We have the media playing along with all this. The ruling class of both parties play along with all this. It’s insulting. I don’t know how else to describe it.”
“What’s happening here, folks, is we are being played for fools and being suckered — suckered into supporting the never-ending expansion of government, the wholesale destruction of the private economy. Everybody who joins in this debate under the premise that Obama puts forth, as well as debating the politics of this nonsense, is just being used to cover up what’s actually going on. Now, what’s going on is no great conspiracy. It’s no mystery. We’re spending much more money than we have.”
Limbaugh says, “I feel like I’ve been here. This is deja vu all over again. I remember the 1995 budget battle. That involved a legitimate government shut down. That wasn’t just $22 billion we were not gonna spend. We’re still gonna spend $3.5 trillion. We’re just not gonna spend $22 billion, if it happens.”
“Everything gets repeated. The cycle, the claims, the threats, the crisis, Armageddon, it’s the same. And we’re talking $22 billion. It’s not as though we’re not gonna spend anything. If the sequester happens, the first year is $44 billion. Half of that’s defense. We’re still going to spend $3.5 trillion or $3.3 trillion, even if we don’t spend the $22 billion.”
“It is the same threats. It’s the same danger. It’s the same crisis. It’s identical. There’s nothing about it that changes, over and over. And everybody gets sucked into it. I try to escape, I try to get out of it, I try to leave it aside, I try to move on, but it just sucks me back in, too, until I realize that I have been sucked back in.”
Limbaugh says an article by Ron Fournier at the National Journal unknowingly proves his point, it’s not about politics.
“Mr. Fournier writes, ‘If it’s all about politics, bully for Obama’ but “[i]f it’s about governing, the story changes” for Obama.’ Yes, siree, Bob. That’s my whole point. ‘You see,’ as Mr. Fournier writes, totally unaware that he’s totally confirming my brilliant theorem of last week, ‘If it’s about governing, then the story changes for Obama.'”
Limbaugh further quotes Fournier, “in any enterprise, the chief executive is ultimately accountable for success and failure. Sure, blame Congress — castigate all 535 lawmakers, or the roughly half you hate. But there is only one president. Even if he’s right on the merits, Obama may be on the wrong side of history. Fair or not, the president owns this mess.”
But Limbaugh takes it a step further. “Mr. Fournier, I disagree with you. He doesn’t. That is the whole point. The president does not own this mess. His approval rating wouldn’t be 55 percent if he owned this mess.”
“He is not governing, Mr. Fournier. You’ve stumbled into this and I’m here to alert you how right you are. You don’t even know it. He’s not governing. It’s all about politics. Congress is being blamed for this. The Republicans are being blamed. Obama is just the outsider trying to fix it all.”
Limbaugh says its an “insulting joke to everybody. This is an embarrassing spectacle. After 1995, 1993, whatever, I’m getting tired of it. I’m worn out. It’s history repeating it’s over and over and over, almost verbatim, from “taking food out of the mouths of children,” to “they’re coming for our children” to “No meat inspectors!” They’re even saying have to close down the sleigh rides in Jellystone Park! That has come up again, like it did in the 1995 budget battle.
“It’s the same stuff. It’s the same threats. It’s the same arguments over and over. Nothing ever changes! We just keep spending more money. We create more dependency, we get more and more irresponsible from one crisis to the next, all of them manufactured.”
“Except for the real crisis, which nobody ever addresses, and that is: We can’t afford any of this.”
Limbaugh does see a glimmer of hope. “The American public needs to learn that the sun will rise. That’s what we need to learn: That the sun will still rise and the sky will still be blue and the birds are still gonna chirp after this sequester if it happens.”
Laments lack of fiscal discipline, media coverage of budget negotiations ...more
Why the traditional view is indeed the correct and biblical view
Exclusive: David Rives notes biblical deluge key to understanding geological world
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us reminds us what happens when we transgress the law
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, minister Bill Morford
Exclusive: David Rives reviews Isaiah verse to explain galaxy expansion
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us 'It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor, author Kerry Kirkwood
Joel Richardson on why believes eternal conscious torment awaits the wicked
Exclusive: David Rives notes most changes are detrimental, not beneficial
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against pagan precepts prevalent in modern worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, pastor John Turnipseed
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Richard Roberts, son of famous father Oral
Joel Richardson is joined by 2 Christian workers giving digital Bibles to refugees to Europe
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, speaker, nutritionist Laura Harris Smith
Daniel 11 cited as source of more information than any other part
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews apostolic minister Robert Heidler
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Tony Kemp of Tony Kemp Ministries
Exclusive: David Rives notes long-term Darwinian theory is neither observable nor repeatable
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us 'by the law is the knowledge of sin'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews mysterious, anonymous healer
Exclusive: David Rives reminds us to marvel at lunar beauty
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against Christian leaders who make a 'business' of ignoring law
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews prophetic healing minister Katherine Ruonala
Will Isaiah 17 soon to be fulfilled amid Syrian civil war?
Exclusive: David Rives reminds us of massive distances in space
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against celebrating a fertility goddess
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Tom Horn and Sharon Gilbert
Exclusive: David Rives points to overwhelming probability of a Designer
Exclusive: Richard Rives extorts us to choose obedience over iniquity
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews apostolic minister Robert Henderson