Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul last week filibustered the confirmation of John Brennan for Central Intelligence Agency director over the fine points of drone use on American citizens.
He stood before the Senate for 13 hours to protest the fact that the government said it could under “extraordinary circumstances” strike an American citizen labeled an enemy combatant on U.S. soil. Many ridiculed him for arguing about something that will never happen.
Maybe it won’t. But in highlighting what is likely an obscure event and getting a ton of media coverage in the process, Rand, a Republican, launched what I hope is the opening salvo of a much bigger debate about the loss of civil liberties in the country.
The issue of drones, in particular, is a great place to start the discussion. Once used primarily to assist U.S. troops overseas in killing enemy fighters and to patrol the U.S. border, they are now being used to surveil U.S. citizens throughout the country. In one of the first public instances of the federal government lending drones to local law enforcement agencies, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) let the Grand Forks, N.D., police and the sheriff’s office borrow a multimillion-dollar Predator in 2011 to monitor a farmer accused of not returning cows worth $6,000 to a neighbor. If something so financially trivial prompts government into using drones, what does it say about the ubiquity of their future use?
Today, DHS is not only lending drones to local agencies but distributing grants to them so that they can buy their own without an official policy in place to guide how and when they can be used. Congress, however, has ordered the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to change airspace rules to make it easier for local police and other organizations to use them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation through a Freedom of Information Act request discovered that 358 public institutions, including 14 universities and colleges, have permits to fly them. This means that machines that can film people not accused of a crime and store the information indefinitely could soon be hovering over your home and neighborhood because the owners and/or the operators feel like it.
According to a recent report by NBC News, the FAA estimates that about 10,000 commercial drones will be flying in the U.S. by about 2020, fueling many schools to start offering training for unmanned aircraft. Who could be against jobs, right?
Before all these programs start, taxpayer dollars are spent and gazillions of images stored, shouldn’t the public and its representatives thoroughly debate the parameters of how the machines can be used? It took a unanimous decision by the Supreme Court last year to tell law enforcement they needed a warrant to track people via GPS, so it’s clear once technology is available, government officials and others will use it regardless of the ethics and constitutionality of it. I don’t know if Americans are yet prepared to become residents of London, where cameras blanket the city, and I don’t think current law adequately protects Americans from unreasonable search and seizure linked to information gathered from unmanned aircraft.
It is also scary to think of how drones dehumanize people. Information generated by them transforms individuals into data points to be analyzed by big government or big business in the same way that they do to enemy combatants. Using a weaponized video game to protect U.S. citizens is one thing, but to turn them loose on Americans, even for civilian reasons, should not be a natural progression.
Ever since Sept. 11, 2001, Americans have been told it’s necessary to sacrifice civil liberties for safety. But the vast majority of new government powers have been used not to monitor terrorists, but for traditional law enforcement. Just because technology exists does not mean it should be used. Without people like Sen. Paul questioning government, however, cradle to grave surveillance will become as American as obesity and bankrupt entitlement programs.
Marta H. Mossburg highlights burgeoning uses of data-collecting drones ...more
Exclusive: David Rives warns about evolutionists sowing dissent among Bible-believing Christians
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us how we distinguish between God of the Bible and other gods
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews minister Dr. Billye Brim
Exclusive: David Rives reminds us of Creator's incredible design
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us Jesus kept the Sabbath, we should too
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews authors, cancer survivors Gary, Rosey Brausen
Why did the Lord command the ancient Hebrews to wipe out entire people groups?
Exclusive: David Rives asks if we can be Christian while believing in 'terrible lizards'
Exclusive: Richard Rives reviews how 2 were blended in early times
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, minister James Goll
Exclusive: David Rives reminds us complexity of molecular language bears fingerprint of our Creator
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns aspects can still be found in aspects of contemporary Christianity
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist, minister, author David Hernandez
Joel Richardson on the critical differences between two wars
Exclusive: David Rives explains natural selection cannot create brand-new generic material
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against pastors who know truth but refuse to present it
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist Perry Stone
Exclusive: David Rives poses thorny dilemma of moral consciousness and what makes humans different
Exclusive: Richard Rives urges caution about adopting aspects of pagan worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Christian cardiologist Dr. Chauncey Crandall
Joel Richardson explains why Jesus clearly was teaching eternal conscious torment for wicked
Exclusive: David Rives points out influences behind aesthetically pleasing, practical creations
Exclusive: Richard Rives questions Roman leader's choice of god to worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor Ron Phillips
Exclusive: David Rives points out current holocaust no one will stop
Exclusive: Richard Rives recounts when pagan influences began infiltrating believers in Yeshua
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor, author Time Sheets
Why the traditional position is indeed the correct and biblical stance
Exclusive: David Rives notes biblical deluge key to understanding geological world
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us reminds us what happens when we transgress the law