• Text smaller
  • Text bigger

There is vulgar, there is dishonest, and then there is Obama. There is contemptible, there is empyema, and then there is Obama. Obama is the transmogrification of diseased exuviae into a biped.

I do not apologize for my harsh critique of him. It needs to be said, and I’m willing to say it. I do not do nice-nice with an abomination set on solidifying his legacy with the Neo-Leninists who follow him by instituting as many Marxist policies that strip of us of our constitutional rights as possible.

Obama had the unmitigated audacity to, with a straight face, tell people in California that increased security is well worth the loss of some of our constitutional privacy rights.

He also said, “And if people can’t trust not only the executive branch but also don’t trust Congress and don’t trust federal judges to make sure that we’re abiding by the Constitution, due process and rule of law, then we’re going to have some problems here.”

The word I would employ here defines a child born out of wedlock. That word is exactly what Obama is. He made that statement with a straight face while in California promoting his takeover of the health-care system.

Are we stupid, or are we just supposed to forget about the lies that “born-out-of-wedlock” liar has uttered? Think about the lies he personally told the American people when he was trying to push Obamacare through. When we said there would be death panels he called us liars. He unleashed government agencies on companies that questioned the validity of his comments, such as the claim our health-care rates won’t increase. He held press events and told We the People that we would be able to keep our personal doctors under Obamacare. Those things were blatant, premeditated lies from the lips of a premeditated liar.

He has the nerve to tell us if we do not trust the executive branch (i.e., the White House that has spent the past four-plus years circumventing the Constitution and depriving us of our rights) that we are going to have trouble. He wants us to trust a feckless Congress that has proven itself to be only slightly more trustworthy than he and his wife. And then he referenced the federal courts that routinely rule against the will of the people.

I take the words of this cancerous macula on the fabric of our nation to be a veiled threat. Obama is a narcissist. He doesn’t say something like that for the sake of saying it. The question is how much of that threat was intended for Congress, and how much was intended for those of us who are the leaders of grass-roots movements?

The only consistent thing about Obama since he took over has been his lies. He said, “So I want to be very clear. Some of the hype that we’ve been hearing over the last day or so [I want you to know] – nobody’s listening to the content of people’s phone calls.” That is an outright lie from an outright liar. Of course they’re listening, and Obama attempts more guile than the serpent that fooled Eve if he expects us to believe differently.

Think for a moment. This is a man who was only able to get elected to the Senate because he and his campaign illegally obtained Republican Jack Ryan’s sealed divorce documents, which referenced embarrassing information Obama used to force Ryan out of the race.

Some of us are personally aware that Obama has tried to intimidate public figures by sending mail to their personal residences that referenced their wife and children. If he is willing to stoop low enough (not that it’s a far reach) to do those things, think what he will do, if he hasn’t already, with access to our emails and free access to listen in on our phone calls and spy on our text messages?

Erebus himself wasn’t as evil and untrustworthy as Obama. Specific to that point, if spying on the American people’s most personal conversations and correspondence is so non-threatening and innocent, why didn’t he tell us his administration was doing it? If it’s so innocent, why did it take a whistleblower to make it known?

Obama is the man who sent Susan Rice before the cameras to lie about the events that precipitated the murders of Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods in Benghazi. Obama is the man who, after lying about the aforementioned, lied about lying. And now he wants us to believe him about spying on us? He wants us to believe it’s for our own good even as he uses veiled threats while trying to convince us?

I am convinced that Obama is doing his level best to implement government corruption through the edict of his office to leave a parting gift for Hillary or whomever the Communist/Socialist Party is able to fool enough people to support in 2016.

It will allow the favored left-wing radical to run as a moderate without having the weight of the abrogation of good government hanging over their head. And, if he or she is elected, the new administration will simply enforce what he has already set in place. We cannot allow this to happen.

Is Congress doing enough to hold the Obama administration accountable to the Constitution and the people?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.