• Text smaller
  • Text bigger

Now that House Speaker John Boehner has ruled out impeaching Barack Obama, what will Republicans do when he fulfills his promise to use executive orders to grant amnesty and work permits to millions of illegal aliens?

Will they sue him, again?

Will they go on television and complain about the patently illegal use of executive authority?

Will they write him a nasty letter?

Or will Boehner and some other Republicans applaud Obama’s action because they, too, have always promoted what amnesty-backers euphemistically call “comprehensive immigration reform”?

It’s a question worth asking, because this is one promise Obama is likely to keep.

The question was put to Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus recently. Here’s how he responded: “I don’t know. … These are hypotheticals. I’ve got enough to worry about on a daily basis let alone worrying about what could happen down the line.”

Fair enough. But what would John Boehner have to say? With all the illegal, unethical, immoral activities of the Obama administration to date, he claims not to be interested in discussing impeachment. He says only Democrats do that so they can raise money on the impeachment issue. It may be true that Democrats do that, but impeachment is, indeed, the only constitutional remedy for unlawful activities by a president.

Experience more of Joseph Farah’s no-nonsense truth-telling in his books, audio and video products, featured in the WND Superstore

Having ruled out impeachment as an option for all Obama has done to date, including other illegal use of executive orders and for encouraging massive illegal immigration that has created a crisis in the country, what would Boehner do?

Keep in mind, even Obama has on several occasions since becoming president acknowledged that he does not have legal authority to use executive orders to suspend deportations or abrogate the law of the land with regard to immigration matters:

  • On March 28, 2011, Obama said he cannot use executive orders to overturn or create new rules on immigration matters: “With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case. There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply through executive order ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as president.”

 

  • On Sept, 28, 2011, Obama asserted that he is required to enforce the immigration laws on the books and has no authority to achieve his objectives without Congress: “I just have to continue to say this notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true. We are doing everything we can administratively. But the fact of the matter is there are laws on the books that I have to enforce. And I think there’s been a great disservice done to the cause of getting the DREAM Act passed and getting comprehensive immigration passed by perpetrating the notion that somehow, by myself, I can go and do these things. It’s just not true. … But we live in a democracy. You have to pass bills through the legislature, and then I can sign it.”

 

  • On Nov. 25, 2013, Obama again reiterated that “we’re a nation of laws” and he “cannot solve all these problems without passing them through Congress”: “If, in fact, I could solve all these problems without passing them through Congress, I would do so. But we’re also a nation of laws.”

 

So, if Obama does this thing, he will be doing it after repeated admissions that he is doing it illegally. That’s pretty brazen. In other words, he will be daring Republicans to impeach him. He will be calling them on their non-bluff, which is worse than calling them on an actual bluff.

There are only a couple possibilities to explain this:

  • He actually welcomes an impeachment fight so he can play the victim role, which, as a lifelong community organizer, is a role in which he is comfortable.
  • He thinks he has already immunized himself against impeachment through his political pre-emptive strike against it.
  • He knows that Republicans fear impeachment to the point of political paralysis and to the point at which it hurts the party with its base.
  • All of the above.

In other words, he thinks Republicans are damned if they do impeach and damned if they don’t impeach.

If they let him get away with an action even he admits is illegal, what’s to stop him from even greater abuse of the executive actions in his remaining two-and-a-half years in office?

Doing this in a midterm election year that is expected to give Republicans gains in the House and Senate is sheer political genius. Whose voters are most likely to stay home if Obama promotes his agenda illegally and the Republicans do nothing about it except complain? You guessed it – Republican voters.

Media wishing to interview Joseph Farah, please contact media@wnd.com.

Receive Joseph Farah's daily commentaries in your email

BONUS: By signing up for Joseph Farah’s alerts, you will also be signed up for news and special offers from WND via email.
  • Where we will email your daily updates
  • A valid zip code or postal code is required
  • Click the button below to sign up for Joseph Farah's daily commentaries by email, and keep up to date with special offers from WND. You may change your email preferences at any time.

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.