I'm curious: If we study outcomes, why have so many governments, including the U.S. government, felt compelled to promote the Islamic culture over homeland cultures?
Glenn Beck recently mentioned that Sweden was realizing the fulfillment of the Cloward-Piven strategy and would lose its national culture in 10-12 years to Islam. Swedish leaders are telling their people that the Swedish culture is not of consequence, but the Islamic culture is rich, beautiful and the ultimate expression of peace. Europe and the United States are implementing these same strategies. The catalyst of Cloward-Piven in Europe is the Islamic migration. In the United States, if POTUS were to have his way, it would be both a Latin American and Islamic migration. More questions to ponder:
1. How have these diverse leaders become willing accomplices to the demise of the cultures they represent?
2. Is there an actual New World Order that is directing these diverse leaders?
3. If so, to what end?
4. If Islam is a pawn, what if it is not controlled?
5. If Islam is not a pawn, then we are at war with Islam and are surrounded by incompetent leaders. How did a group of incompetent leaders across the West all ascend to power at the same time?
John Reneski