A Democratic election commissioner in New York City has admitted that the nation’s processes for voting – which would allow a burqa-clad woman to get a ballot – produce a “lot of bad results.”
The comment prompted James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas to test the theory by sending an undercover journalist clad in a burqa to a polling station and asking for a ballot to vote in the name of Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s longtime close adviser.
The journalist was offered a ballot but did not accept it.
See the video:
New York City Democratic Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin’s comments were recorded months ago at a United Federal of Teachers holiday party.
He explained “how Muslims can use burqas as a way to commit voter fraud,” according to Project Veritas.
“Your vote isn’t really counting because they can go in there with a burqa on and you don’t know if they are a voter,” Schulkin said. “Your vote gets discounted because they come in with a burqa on and they can vote. People think that it’s a liberal thing to do, but I take my vote seriously, and I don’t want 10 other people coming in negating my vote by voting for the other candidate when they’re not even registered voters. I mean I know everything is done with good intentions, but a lot of bad results.”
Project Veritas said it sent an undercover journalist dressed in full burqa to Huma Abedin’s polling location
“Shockingly,” the undercover journalist identifying herself as Abedin was offered a provisional ballot by an election official.
The election official said: “Your name is not in the book. For some reason it’s not here, but that doesn’t mean you can’t vote by paper ballot. You just can’t vote by machine.”
The undercover journalist said, “OK, so I can vote today?”
“By paper,” said the election official.
“So I can vote as Huma Abedin, but just with the paper ballot?”
“If that’s the name you voted with in the last election, and you haven’t changed your name?”
Project Veritas and its arm, Project Veritas Action, have released a number of videos this election season revealing the failings of the system.
On Friday, the group revealed the identity of a witness in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal who never had been interviewed by the FBI.
Also found was an instruction from a State Department official as long ago as 2010 that staffers “never” should mention the fact that Clinton’s email was run through her private, unsecured server.
Department of State IT Systems Administrator Cindy Almodovar reported she met with Huma Abedin in December 2010 for half an hour regarding emails at the “then unknown, but now notorious, @clintonemail.com site.”
Almodovar explained Abedin had had trouble sending and receiving emails. Almodovar said in an email: “She gave me some examples listed below, but also, things are inconsistent.”
One issue was an email sent to her twice that morning but not delivered.
Previous videos addressed a number of other subjects.
Editor’s note: The videos that follow contain offensive language.
A recent video caught a major donor to Hillary Clinton’s campaign in a racist rant.
It shows Benjamin Barber blasting blacks who are supporting the “other side” as “seriously f—– in the head.”
“Have you heard of the Sonderkommandos? Jewish guards who helped murder Jews in the camps. So there were even Jews that were helping the Nazis murder Jews! So blacks who are helping the other side are seriously f—– in the head. They’re only helping the enemy who will destroy them. Maybe they think, ‘If I help them, we’ll get along OK; somehow I’ll save my race by working with the murderers,'” Barber said.
Barber was attending a fundraiser for Deborah Ross, a Democratic Party candidate for U.S. Senate from North Carolina, the report from Project Veritas Action said.
Bishop Patrick L. Wooden Sr., a black voter in North Carolina, told Project Veritas that Ross “has shown her true colors.”
“If this is not a, if that … what you just showed me is not racism and condescending and basically calling blacks stupid and ignorant and saying that we are voting against our own self-interest if we support any Republican. I am appalled. I am in incensed. Deborah Ross should be called to task for something like that,” he said.
Another black leader, Robert Foster, said: “Wow…. So that’s what they think of us. … I’m speechless for the most part. It’s wrong. It’s an eye opener. But that’s what happens when we as blacks vote a majority just for one party.”
Another video shows a Clinton-supporting advocacy organization with no trouble accepting a $20,000 donation funneled through a Belize bank to use in his year’s presidential election campaign.
That is, until its decision was about to be made public.
Project Veritas’ first video showed how the Clinton campaign uses “hidden connections” to incite violence at Donald Trump rallies. Its second video showed plans for step-by-step voter fraud and the third exposed “prohibited communications” between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, “the DNC and the nonprofit Americans United for Change.”
The fourth video “breaks down the process of the long-term investigation.”
O’Keefe and Project Veritas Action have filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission. The videos also have resulted in the termination of Bob Creamer and Scott Foval from their jobs with various Democratic groups.
In the first video, Foval, a Democratic Party operative, boasted of what he called “conflict engagement,” or sending protesters to disrupt Trump events.
“We’re starting anarchy here,” he said. “And he needs to understand that we’re starting anarchy.”
In the second video, Creamer, another Democrat operative, explained Clinton’s direct control over those disruption operations.
“In the end it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground, so by god we would get ducks on the ground,” Creamer said.
Creamer, the husband of Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, has been spotlighted in several of the undercover videos.
The third video:
The filing of the complaint with the federal agency followed the release of two videos in which Democrats explain how they can attempt to change the outcome of the election through apparently fraudulent means, such as having people travel across state lines to vote illegally.
Another complaint was filed with the FEC by the Public Interest Legal Foundation, a nonprofit organization “dedicated to protect the right to vote, preserve the constitutional framework of American elections, and educate the public on the issue of election integrity.”
See the second video:
Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh said the evidence is worrisome.
“Every Trump rally would feature none of this [violence] unless the Democrats were paying for it. I think it’s a big deal, folks. The media is complicit. They know who these people are. … They’re in on it. They’re part of the game. … None of it’s organic. None of it’s natural. None of it’s real. Every bit of it is bought and paid for.
“[Democrats] can’t leave elections to chance because they know that, despite the way it may look, the majority of Americans would not support them if they knew who they are.”
The first video: