There is an old axiom that reminds us "even a broken clock is right twice a day." With that thought in mind, I turn your attention to CNN, which for the second time in its deplorable history has unequivocally proven a point that I have been making for many years.
The first time was when CNN posited itself shortly after its origin as being the politburo of agitprop for unhinged liberals. The second time that proves the axiom I referenced is that the would-be news network is running a so-called documentary series intended to "investigate sex education."
Why does this make them right for the second time? Because the alleged documentary is nothing more than a variant pornography series that transpicuously proves it is beyond past time to remove our children from public schools.
I have argued this point many times over – and the excuses from self-professing Christian leaders for not removing children from public schools have ranged from ease of access to affordability. But concern over the coerced (read "forced") inculcation of children with the most vulgar and reprehensible forms of debauchery is seldom mentioned as a reason to withdraw children from same.
The CNN series, titled "This is Sex with Lisa Ling," is being promoted as "exploring the taboos around sex in America and the ways in which sexuality has been stigmatized, policed, and politicized." ("Sex ed gets graphic in new CNN series," Fox News, Sept. 20) I pause for a moment to say that promoting homosexuality to children along with what decent and responsible parents consider the lowest forms of depravity is not the function of public education.
TRENDING: America's most dangerous demographic
"The documentary [shows] students learning how to put a condom on fake penis models and being taught about how to have safe anal sex, during the discussion at James Monroe High School in Los Angeles. Questions involved the technical term for a female receiving oral sex and the area of skin between a female's private parts.
"The school has leaned into [California's] very open sexual education laws and even has a teen health clinic where students can get contraception and the 'Morning After' pill for free."
Specific to that point, the abortifacient drugs are not free; the bill is being footed by the taxpayers, many of whom oppose such a classroom climate, of a state that teeters on the brink of bankruptcy. That notwithstanding, is this is what California public schools deem a necessary curriculum for children K-12?
California isn't alone; it is simply the state where homosexual jurists override the legitimate votes of the citizenry opposing homosexual marriage.
What parents who ill-advisedly leave their children in public schools fail to realize is that this is not about education – it is about the desensitizing of future generations to depravity. It is also the naked undermining of traditional families by the homosexual-activist agenda.
Quoting from my syndicated column of several years ago: "Dr. Bryce Christensen, Ph.D., wrote: 'Only the ideologically blind would deny that homosexual marriage threatens violence against all the moral and legal traditions that have defined wedlock for millennia. … Homosexual activists have themselves asserted that they … want homosexual marriage to destabilize marriage's gendered definition by disrupting the link between gender and marriage.'" (See: "Marriage obfuscates real homosexual agenda," mychal-massie.com.)
The following is an excerpt from Part 1 of the "Homosexual Manifesto" (first published in Gay Community News, Feb. 15-21, 1987, and also placed into the Congressional Record. Author – Michael Swift):
- Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles.
- We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your … youth groups. … Your sons … will be recast in our image.
In the Spring 2003 issue of City Journal, Marjorie King wrote what possibly remains as the most thorough treatise on this subject titled: "Queering the Schools – [homosexual] activist groups, with teachers' union applause, are importing a disturbing agenda into the nation's public schools."
In July 2015, I warned families in my syndicated column titled: "Is this the real homosexual end game?" (See: mychal-massie.com, July 6, 2015.) I have written extensively over my professional writing career and have spoken publicly in my pursuit to awaken parents to the harm public schools are to the moral character of children.
I challenge responsible parents and churches to read the associated articles I have included and tell me if leaving our children in public schools is morally and spiritually proper.
I repeat that which I have often stated. It is not politicians and debauched activists who are damaging our children. It is so-called Christian advocacy leaders, irresponsible parents and godless churches who are the real threat to our children, by allowing them to be sacrificed to the morally corrosive indoctrination of public schools.