I don’t have a problem with drones being used to kill terrorists. If those terrorists happen to be American citizens who have decided join foreign powers to engage in acts of war or terror against the United States military, they have forfeited their citizenship and rights, as far as I’m concerned. Enemies are constantly killed in warfare. An American jihadist is a domestic enemy just as much as a non-citizen would be. If police can shoot and kill a criminal or a homeowner can kill a home invader, why not kill a terrorist, regardless of his citizenship? Would those opposed to killing American jihadists approve of killing Britis ... continue reading »
Regarding McCain, Graham blast Paul filibuster” – RINOs and most Democrats are extremist statists shamming as adversaries – both camps having facilitated the forever expansion of a central government that now reckons its own citizens as enemies. The political dinosaurs of Washington, D.C., best listen to what Rand Paul said during his 13-hour filibuster because the bell tolling their twilight can be clearly heard.
Several questions about the next two probable presidential candidates – to wit: Would Hillary’s ability to “look the other way” enable insights into successful leadership? Would overcoming any stigma of inherited wealth be a plus for Jeb Bush? Would either Hillary or Jeb have achieved national attention without connection to a president? Seem fair questions indeed. Of course, the present presidential standards have, in the view of millions, been lowered to the depths of the Marianna Trench.
Joseph, maybe you can explain to me why freaking COMMUNISTS, like Hugo Chavez, for instance, are all called socialists now? Why are supposed rightsiders such weaklings, wimps and quislings? Seems like you all can’t, or won’t, stop dancing to the commie tune.
I recall back when all commie dictators had titles other than president, like premiere, for instance. Then the bastards became presidents. Why? What in hell did they do to deserve it? After 50 years of allowing the commiecrats to call the shots, well, you get the government you refuse to fight, sir!
Your article “Evidence mounts abortion, birth control cause cancer” is a distortion of fact. There’s NO mention of abortion in the JAMA article – zero. What the article does state is that “… the incidence of breast cancer with distant involvement at diagnosis increased in 25- to 39-year-old women from 1.53 per 100,000 in 1976 to 2.90 per 100,000 in 2009,” and “distant involvement” was defined as remote metastases (i.e., metastases to certain other parts of the body). That has nothing to do with abortion, but it probabl ... continue reading »
I totally agree with Rush: Unless we get a real honest to goodness conservative, who doesn’t apologize for our principled stands and values and stands firm because WE KNOW WE ARE RIGHT, we will never get the Dems out. Amen to Rush.