I think there’s more to “gun-free school zones” than meets the eye.
This idiocy was actually enacted during the Clinton years, and I think the whole purpose behind it was a hope that there would be massacres.
Leftists could say, “Look, we did what we could. We made school zones gun-free, but it obviously just wasn’t enough.We need to ban/register/confiscate all guns.” But in reality “gun-free school zones” would logically and inevitably result in massacres, and I think they hoped for that and counted on that, to advance their anti-gun agenda while crying crocodile tears.
I have just removed my name from your email listing.
If you can find any truth or charity in offering a book like “Petrus Romanus,” then you have veered too far, and I want nothing to do with you or your organization.
You clearly have had an anti-Catholic bent, which I have overlooked, but this book is beyond my ability to ignore. It is a shame that you will sell such a hateful book just to make a buck.
We all know the consequences of the love of money, and you are heading there quickly. I will shake the dust of yo ... continue reading »
President Barack Obama and the Democratic Senate are considering sweeping legislation that will provide new benefits for many Americans. The Americans with No Abilities Act is being hailed as a major legislative goal by advocates of the millions of Americans who lack any real skills or ambition.
“Roughly 50 percent of Americans do not possess the competence and drive necessary to carve out a meaningful role for themselves in society,” said California Sen. Barbara Boxer. “We can no longer stand by and allow People of Inability (POI) to be ridiculed and passed over. With this legislation, employers will no longer be ... continue reading »
Hey, Chelsea, great job on the article “The growing case for impeachment of Obama.” The common man on the street who knows anything about the Constitution knows that this man should have already been impeached and tried for crimes. You presented the material that we all know contains the legitimate charges!
It continues to amaze us out here that presidents of the past have been impeached or drummed out of office (Nixon) for essentially ONE offense, while this man has committed numerous crimes without anybody saying one word up there in D.C.
Keep up the gre ... continue reading »
Obama should not be impeached as that would add credibility to his actions in the presidency. If any of the constitutional “experts” cited in your story were to abide by the document, they would be calling for him to be imprisoned, not impeached. He is not qualified for the position he is in; a foreign father denies him from the constitutional requirement for presidency. It matters not where he was born; it is his parentage that counts.
Perhaps we should start a petition to strongly suggest to this administration that they utilize their well-armed domestic army (DHS) to deploy them to the cities of Chicago and Philadelphia to clean up the criminal gangs there, rather than their apparent plan of turning them (DHS) loose on freedom-loving conservative or libertarian elements across the nation.