Good morning, Mr. Farah. Thanks for your refreshingly clear and decisive piece opposing a federally mandated minimum wage ["Obama the cheapskate"]. I remember debating the economics of this in high-school competition during the 1960s, but do not recall ever hearing then an argument that now clinches every issue for me: If the U.S. Constitution does not require it, the federal government has no authority to do it.
I very much agree with your campaign to confront office-holders with a direct personal letter and a copy of the Constitution; I will support you.
Behind you all the way, ... continue reading »
Sex classes at the University of Chicago. Why doesn’t this surprise me? This is the gutter level that schools have now dropped. Rather than teach their students grammar, how to comprehend what they “read,” though many can’t read at their grade level, teachers get a raise. Schools pass students who can’t read even at third-grade levels, can’t comprehend what they DO read, can’t do basic arithmetic … BUT WE CAN TEACH THEM ANAL SEX?
With the increasing mainstream media’s non sequitur narratives, your reporting proves time and again trustworthy. Thank you for truth and honesty in a day when these are held with disdain by the large media outlets.
Michael A. Duffy
Regarding the question on your February Whistleblower cover ["Tyranny or stupidity?"], the answer is simply, “Yes.”
Tyranny, because the administration believes it can willfully violate the “antiquated” Constitution to accomplish what it knows best. The complicity of Congress has added to that concept. Congress has not fulfilled the obligation it assumed when it swore to uphold that antiquated Constitution.
Stupidity, because neither the president nor Congress recognize the growing unrest of the common man. Following the Frenc ... continue reading »
While I laud your efforts to keep us informed, there is one area you are very off base on, and it is a constitutional point.
Doesn’t anyone understand that Obama legally cannot be impeached? He is an illegally sitting president.
Let me explain. Say a person puts on a police uniform and starts making traffic stops. Ultimately he is caught and arrested. Does the police chief now have to start civil-service proceedings against him to remove him from the office he never legally held? Then why on earth do we think we have to impeach this impostor? He needs to be arrested and have his rear end tried for all the crimes ... continue reading »
Obama says gun owners should have a background check. Perhaps gun owners would agree to a background check when Obama agrees to a background check.