Is this really the kind of swill WND supports? ["Why do we celebrate inferior, foreign cultures?"] Erik Rush’s xenophobic, nationalistic diatribe is more fitting for perhaps the KKK. It certainly fits the new chic, reformed appearance they’re trying to portray. Sure, I’m only one reader, but I’m sure there are many that are reconsidering if this a site they want to continue to read but haven’t taken the time to let you know as I have here.
WND seems to advocate Christian views quite a bit. That’s fine. That’s what attracte ... continue reading »
I am fed up with Congress sending messages.
Judge Napolitano said Congress sent the Washington establishment a message when it “almost” passed the Amash-Conyers amendment to restrict the NSA spying.
The House has voted to repeal Obamacare some 33 times – big freakin’ deal! Now they are afraid to defund the most disastrous bill in history.
The House held Eric Holder in contempt of Congress – whoop tee do! He still runs around choosing which laws to enforce and directly shoving it into the face of the Supreme Court.
Here is the message they need to hear: If your are not willing to defund the ... continue reading »
I hope and pray that Ted Nugent gets his meds under control ["The greatest phony America's ever known"].
Thank you for the fine article on the president’s visit and his “plans” for jobs ["Newspaper to Obama: Shove it, Mr. President"].
One point noted at the end of the article mentioned tax, presumably income tax, and simplifying it. It seems to me that if we – EVERYONE – paid a straight 10 percent across the board, without loopholes and other deductions, most of us would be paying at a lower bracket and more tax would be paid/collected annually now than is currently paid in. Plus everyone would be in the same 10 percent bracket, including elected o ... continue reading »
President Obama thinks he has created over 7 million jobs in the last 40 months. Not only is that B.S., but more than that number has entered the workforce from college and high school, so the net effect would be a negative amount of job creation. Why doesn’t the media take him to task for his outright lies?
If I remember correctly, back in the good old days (the ’90s) when we had our sex god president, William Caligula Clinton, in the Oval Office, we were told that character didn’t matter. With this thought in mind, I find it odd that Mr. Clinton is upset with the antics of Anthony Weiner. I was more expecting a response such as: “If I had a son, he would be like Anthony Weiner.”