|
A Free Press |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MEDIA MATTERS NYT dubs man-woman union: 'Opposite-sex marriage' 'Politicization of language is nothing new, but this is particularly disturbing' Posted: October 27, 2009 9:42 pm Eastern By Chelsea Schilling
In his Oct. 26 news report on a homosexual lawsuit to overturn California's Proposition 8 reserving marriage for a man and a woman, New York Times reporter Adam Liptak described traditional unions as "opposite-sex marriage." Referring to attorney Charles J. Cooper, who is pressing the case against recognition of homosexual marriage, Liptak wrote, "The government should be allowed to favor opposite-sex marriages, Mr. Cooper said, in order 'to channel naturally procreative sexual activity between men and women into stable, enduring unions.'" Catholic League president Bill Donohue pointed out that the New York Times has used the term "opposite-sex marriage" 10 times in the past, and in a news story only five times. He also noted that the term was used on a few occasions in the 1990s by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Yale Law Journal and the New Republic. "Is this the start of one more round of corrupting the English language?" Donohue asked in an editorial on the Catholic League website. (Story continues below) He said use of the term reveals a distressing pattern. "Here's how it will play out in the classroom: kindergartners will be told that some adults choose same-sex marriage and some choose opposite-sex marriage," Donohue wrote. "There is no moral difference – it's just a matter of different strokes for different folks. Not mentioned, of course, will be that some male-on-male sex practices are dangerous. Nor will it be pointed out that only so-called opposite-sex marriages are capable of reproducing the human race. "In other words, the kids will be lied to about what nature ordains." While Donahue acknowledged that politicization of language is nothing new, he called the New York Times example "particularly disturbing." "Marriage means one thing, and attempts to make it a smorgasbord are pernicious," he said.
If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.
Related special offers: "The Little Book of Big Reasons to Homeschool" "The Gay Agenda: It's Dividing the Family, the Church, and a Nation"
Previous stories: Schools put on notice: Mass boycott of Harvey Milk Day Lawmakers: Schoolkids must study 'sexual predator' Schwarzenegger wants your 'thoughts' on 'gay' day School board breaking federal law with 'gay' day? Mandatory 'gay' day for K-5 students Teachers cite 'clergy' privilege to hide lesbian teaching 'Gay' day coming to California public schools? Stealth lessons on homosexuality Teaching homosexuality, no parents needed Student resolution objects to 'gay' promotion Death threats target those opposing 'gay' day Keep kids home, parents are told Parental permission required for 'gay' club District bans 'John 3:16,' promotes demonic leer Crackdown on biblical speech challenged Parents urged to boycott homosexual indoctrination Student told: 'Leave your faith in the car' California ripped as 'too queer for school' Christians need Exodus from 'Pharaoh's system' Baptist 'exit strategy' means get kids out of public schools 2 more 'sexual indoctrination' bills vetoed Christian-education push goes to states Sexual indoctrination bill vetoed Hundreds rally to threaten Gov. Arnold with 'veto' Gov. Arnold urged to cancel sexual indoctrination California Christians urged to yank kids Gov. Arnold tosses school moral codes Dobson: Tell Arnold to halt 'gay' agenda Constitution threatened by homeschool case Homeschool entrepreneurism catches fire U.N. making homeschooling illegal? Chelsea Schilling is a staff writer for WorldNetDaily.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||