A Free Press
For A Free People

  Founded 1997 Edition  



WND
BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS

Student says 'F--- off!' on test, gets better grade

Earns credit for proper spelling, effective communication


Posted: June 30, 2008
10:11 pm Eastern

© 2010 WorldNetDaily

"F--- off" is an acceptable answer that earned one student two points on his English exam for accurate spelling and properly conveying meaning.

Students are receiving credit for foul language on the British General Certificate of Secondary Education English examinations, the London Times reported. In some cases, the foul answers have little to do with the question.

The boy's test was graded by chief examiner Peter Buckroyd who teaches other examiners to grade using the same standard. Buckroyd gave graders strict instructions to adhere to his scoring guidelines, even giving credit to students who wrote only foul words on their tests.

According to the report, Buckroyd said he awarded two points, out of a possible 27, to the boy who scribbled the F-word into a test blank in response to the statement, "Describe the room you're sitting in."

To receive a minimum grade on the test, a student must show "some simple sequencing of ideas" and "some words in appropriate order." Buckroyd claimed the boy had attained the stated goal.

"It would be wicked to give it zero, because it does show some very basic skills we are looking for – like conveying some meaning and some spelling," he told the Times. "It's better than someone that doesn't write anything at all. It shows more skills than somebody who leaves the page blank."

(Story continues below)

   

Buckroyd, chief examiner of English for the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance examination board, oversees test standards for 780,000 candidates and training for an additional 3,000 graders. He said he uses the F-bomb example to illustrate detailed grading techniques to new examiners.

"It elucidates some useful points – it shows some nominal skills but no relevance to the task," he said.

While Buckroyd believed the response to be unsuitable, he compared it to using the construction "different to" and said it would be equally inappropriate.

The chief examiner said the profane statement would have received more points if the student had provided punctuation.

"If it had had an exclamation mark it would have got a little bit more because it would have been showing a little bit of skill," he said, "We are trying to give higher marks to the students who show more skills."

 


Related special offers:

Can you believe this goes on at U.S. colleges?

Let everyone know your child is an honor student - at home!

None Dare Call It Education

The Harsh Truth about Public Schools

You've Decided to Homeschool, Now What?

"The Little Book of Big Reasons to Homeschool"

 


Previous stories:

Polls show parents want education alternatives

Today's class: Hating Jews 101

Bilingual, pro-American book 'unfit' for L.A. schools

Female teacher arrest for 9 flings with student

School 'stonewalls' over pregnancy poll

6th-grade survey: Classmate most likely to get pregnant

3rd-graders asked to help classmate in gender change

Children's hospital launches sex change for kids program

Voting rights challenged in 'coed showers' lawsuit








Share/Bookmark      E-mail to a Friend        Printer-friendly version


  |  Page 1   |  Page 2   |  Commentary   |  WND Money   |  WND TV/Radio   |  Diversions   |  G2 Bulletin   |  About Us   |  Terms of Use   |  Privacy   |  Contact Us   |  
Copyright 1997-2010
All Rights Reserved. WorldNetDaily.com Inc.