A Free Press
For A Free People

  Founded 1997 Edition  



WND Exclusive
LAW OF THE LAND

Cops use banned noise ordinance against street preacher

Court orders limit tossed, but officers say it doesn't apply to them


Posted: December 05, 2008
10:25 pm Eastern

© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Attorneys for the Alliance Defense Fund earlier this year settled a case against Ithaca, N.Y., over an ordinance that violated the free speech rights of a street preacher. A federal court banned enforcement of the disputed rule,  which restricted sounds that could be heard from 25 feet away.

But it took only a couple of visits from another street evangelist, and the attorneys were back in court with another action against Ithaca. Police officers who were told about the court order insisted it didn't apply to them, because they weren't involved in the first case.

The original 1999 dispute, involving Kevin Deegan, was settled earlier this year, according to ADF officials. The resolution included a court order prohibiting officials "from enforcing a municipal code that ... restricts sounds on public streets, sidewalks, or paths that can be heard from 25 feet," which, the legal group noted, would ban sneezing or cell phone rings.

(Story continues below)

   

"Three months ago, a friend of Kevin's, Jim Deferio was standing at Kevin's accustomed spot on the commons, doing a little preaching of his own. He, too, was approached by police officers who told him he'd have to stop, since he was violating the same city ordinance their predecessors had invoked against Kevin," the ADF said in a new report.

"The next week, Kevin went back to the spot with Jim, and the two of them were approached by police, citing the same law. Kevin produced a copy of the federal court order authorizing him to exercise his rights, but the officers told him – incredibly – that the order didn't apply to them – only to the specific officers who had confronted Kevin years earlier," the ADF reported.

"So, now ADF is representing Jim. We've filed a federal lawsuit against the city of Ithaca on his behalf, along with a motion asking the court to suspend the ordinance while the case moves forward."

Nate Kellum, a senior counsel with ADF, commented.

"Police officers cannot step beyond their authority and illegally suppress Christian speech in defiance of a court order," he said.

The new complaint explains, "This is a civil rights action challenging city ordinances and policy, on their face and as applied, that prohibit noise heard 25 feet from its source in the City of Ithaca. These precise ordinances and policy of City of Ithaca have already been declared unconstitutional by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and enjoined by this court in Deegan v. City of Ithaca, et al."

City officials did not respond to a WND request for comment today.

The original case involving Deegan came when he was delivering a Gospel message in Ithaca Commons. Officers cited Deegan under the noise ordinance – the only apparent use of that ordinance in its history at that time – despite any number of "recreation activities, celebrations, demonstrations, rallies, musical performances, poetry readings, speeches, and other expressive undertakings" that have gone on there.

Deegan was told the city banned sound loud enough to be heard more than 25 feet away.

"Kevin was understandably stunned," ADF said. "Under those restrictions, public sneezing would be illegal on the streets of Ithaca. So would almost every other activity then under way on the commons. Indeed, as a noise expert hired by the Alliance Defense Fund (which represented Kevin) testified, this city ordinance would outlaw even such everyday sounds as the clicking of boots, small children playing, a ringing cell phone, and normal-decibel conversations."

Ultimately, the appeals court panel ruled in favor of Deegan's First Amendment right to free speech, even on the Ithaca Commons, ADF reported.

"Noisy free speech abounds here, yet Mr. Deegan was limited to a whisper," Kellum said.

The appeals court ruling said the city's officials could not "justify their even stricter regulation of Deegan's speech in the Commons, which is a public forum bustling with the sounds of recreation, celebration, commerce, demonstration, rallies, music, poetry, speeches, and other expressive undertakings."


Related offers:

Joseph Farah rips the lamestream media a new one in 'Stop the Presses!'

Borders, language, and culture! Get Michael Savage's 'The Savage Nation' at reduced price

Michael Savage health classic ? Only limited number left!

Glenn Beck's 'Real America': Broadcaster rails against many of the forces keeping us from our potential

Hillary stars in 'Help! Mom! There are Liberals Under My Bed'

"Liberwocky: What Liberals Say and What They Really Mean"

"POISON PRESS: How the big media's death throes are heralding a stunning information revolution"

Rush Limbaugh: Expos? on Michael Moore, Barbra Streisand 'just fabulous!'

 


Previous stories:

Witch City preaching conviction challenged

Witch City judge: Preaching is 'disorderly conduct'

Preacher on trial for ministering in 'Witch City'

Liberty Bell speech limits case delayed

Liberty Bell rangers halt minister's speech

San Francisco supervisors condemn Savage

San Francisco fails in attack on Savage

Top attorney backs Savage against San Fran official

Savage attacked by officials pushing immigrant bailout

'It's not just Imus,' warn talk-radio headhunters

'Hush Rush' bill ? gone, not forgotten

Voinovich self-destructs on Hannity

Kerry joins Fairness Doctrine chorus

Democrats hope to hush Rush

Claim: Hillary, Boxer look to 'fix' talk radio

Sean Hannity inspires character in kids' book

Florida county surrenders to Rush Limbaugh fans

'It's not just Imus,' warn talk-radio headhunters

'Right-wing' radio, TV guys split on control of U.S. ports

Disney to announce sale of ABC Radio next week

Hannity igniting revolt against left-wing profs

State's 'hate crimes' code used against 'pure speech'

'Hate crimes' charge doesn't require 'hate'

Political website cited for crime of 'offending'

Kennedy cramming hate crimes into defense bill

'Snopes gets it wrong on hate crimes'

President says 'hate crimes' plan unneeded

Will Bush veto 'thought police'?

Christians in bull's-eye in new 'hate crimes' plan

Congress debates 'jail grandma' hate speech

'Jail grandma' hate speech debate begins

Christian 'hate sites' blasted by Hindus

Christian belief a 'hate crime' under plan

Diss a 'gay'? Go to jail!

 








Share/Bookmark      E-mail to a Friend        Printer-friendly version


  |  Page 1   |  Page 2   |  Commentary   |  WND Money   |  WND TV/Radio   |  Diversions   |  G2 Bulletin   |  About Us   |  Terms of Use   |  Privacy   |  Contact Us   |  
Copyright 1997-2010
All Rights Reserved. WorldNetDaily.com Inc.