|
A Free Press |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1ST AMENDMENT ON TRIAL Hostile bloggers facing fines, jail? Proposal 'comes close to making it federal offense to log onto Internet' Posted: May 06, 2009 10:39 pm Eastern By Bob Unruh
A new proposal in Congress is threatening fines and jail time for what it calls "cyberbullying" – communications that include e-mails and text messages that "cause substantial emotional distress." The vague generalities are included in H.R. 1966 by California Democrat Linda Sanchez and about a dozen co-sponsors. But it already is being condemned as unconstitutional, unrealistic and probably ineffectual. At Wired.com, in a report labeled "Threat Level," writer David Kravets criticized the plan to demand "up to two years in prison for those whose electronic speech is meant to 'coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress.'" "Instead of prison, perhaps we should say gulag," he wrote. (Story continues below) Such limits never would pass First Amendment muster, "unless the U.S. Constitution was altered without us knowing," he wrote. "So Sanchez, and the 14 other lawmakers who signed on to the proposal are grandstanding to show the public they care about children and are opposed to cyberbullying." The plan is labeled the Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act, after the 13-year-old Meier, whose suicide last year reportedly was prompted by a woman who utilized the MySpace social networking site to send the teen critical messages. Speak out now against limits on your speech! The defendant in the case, Lori Drew, was accused under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. "Sanchez's bill goes way beyond cyberbullying and comes close to making it a federal offense to log onto the Internet or use the telephone," Kravets wrote. "The methods of communication where hostile speech is banned include e-mail, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones and text messages." "We can't say what we think of Sanchez's proposal," he said. "Doing so would clearly get us two years in solitary confinement." Wrote a contributor to the Wired forum page, "If passed, this legislation could be easily abused with the effect of criminalizing all criticism. You probably [couldn't] even criticize the legislation itself because it would cause Sen. Sanchez emotional distress or possibly be considered a form of intimidation." The bill, which has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, states, "Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." It states: "Cyberbullying can cause psychological harm, including depression; negatively impact academic performance, safety, and the well-being of children in school; force children to change schools; and in some cases lead to extreme violent behavior, including murder and suicide."
Related special offers: Speak out now against limits on your speech! "The Little Book of Big Reasons to Homeschool" "The Gay Agenda: It's Dividing the Family, the Church, and a Nation" Previous stories: 'Gay' advocates attack those who don't support cause Death threats target opponents of 'gay' promotion Keep kids home, parents are told Parental permission required for 'gay' club District bans 'John 3:16,' promotes demonic leer Crackdown on biblical speech challenged Parents urged to boycott homosexual indoctrination Student told: 'Leave your faith in the car' California ripped as 'too queer for school' Christians need Exodus from 'Pharaoh's system' Baptist 'exit strategy' means get kids out of public schools 2 more 'sexual indoctrination' bills vetoed Christian-education push goes to states Sexual indoctrination bill vetoed Hundreds rally to threaten Gov. Arnold with 'veto' Gov. Arnold urged to cancel sexual indoctrination California Christians urged to yank kids Gov. Arnold tosses school moral codes Dobson: Tell Arnold to halt 'gay' agenda Constitution threatened by homeschool case Homeschool entrepreneurism catches fire U.N. making homeschooling illegal? Bob Unruh is a news editor for WorldNetDaily.com.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||