|
A Free Press |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS Bow your head, break the law!Court ruling goes against coach who 'respected' student prayersPosted: April 16, 2008 11:30 pm Eastern © 2010 WorldNetDaily
A federal appeals court ruled a New Jersey high school football coach who bowed his head while students on his team led prayer broke the law. The decision against coach Marcus Borden of East Brunswick High School, however, will be appealed, said John Whitehead, president of the Virginia-based civil-liberties group the Rutherford Institute. "If this ruling is allowed to stand, it will mean that high school teachers across the United States will have no free speech or academic freedom rights at all," he said. "This undermines a time-honored tradition that has less to do with religion that it does athletic tradition. It's a sad statement on our rights as Americans that schools are no longer bastions of freedom." (Story continues below) Borden's practice was to bow his head silently or "take a knee" while students on his football team led prayer prior to games. But in 2005, officials at East Brunswick High School adopted a policy prohibiting representatives of the school district from participating in student-initiated prayer, even though it had been a regular part of the team's pre-game activities for 25 years. The school concluded while it could not infringe on the students' constitutionally protected right to pray, it could limit the actions of coaches, who are public employees and whose participation allegedly would violate "the separation of church and state." U.S. District Judge Dennis Cavanaugh ruled the following year the district's interpretation was wrong and that school officials were violating Borden's rights to free speech, freedom of association and academic freedom. The district, however, challenged the ruling and, aided by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, argued Borden lacked any constitutional rights to expression or academic freedom because of his duties as teacher and coach. The appellate judges concluded Borden's acts "cross the line and constitute and unconstitutional endorsement of religion."
Related offers: Criminalizing Christianity: How America's founding religion is becoming illegal
Related stories: University newspaper: God tells Mary, 'You're f----d' :Sex show returns to college that banished cross University 'bias' plan can get you busted Prez who removed Wren Cross now gives up campus duties Alumni want Wren Cross prez booted Board in Wren Cross fiasco targeted Newspaper says Wren Cross university chief 'unfit' Students want Wren Cross explanation Cross ban could cost $12 million Cross-snatching college holds porn show Gingrich says Wren Chapel endangered 'Virginia legislature won't like cross dispute' College prez backtracks on cross removal Chapel cross issue stands 5,000 to 1, but who's counting? College chief defends banishment of cross 2,000 names on petition seek restoration of cross 'Save the Wren Cross' campaign is launched O'Connor new chancellor of cross-removing college College removes cross ? from chapel! Are feathers 'hostile and abusive' to Indians? Canada high court to rule on 'kemosabe'
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||