e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
For Annual and Transition Reports Pursuant to
Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
| |
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
|
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
OR |
| |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
|
For the Transition Period
from to |
Commission File Number 001-12755
Dean Foods Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
75-2559681 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2515 McKinney Avenue
Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 303-3400
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including
area code, of Registrants principal executive
offices)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
| |
|
|
| Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
| |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned-issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any
amendment to this
Form 10-K o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
large accelerated
filer þ accelerated
filer o non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2).
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting and
non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant
at June 30, 2005, based on the $35.24 per share
closing price for the registrants common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2005, was approximately
$5.22 billion.
The number of shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding as of March 6, 2006 was 135,691,129.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement for
its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about
May 19, 2006 (to be filed) are incorporated by reference
into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
We are a leading food and beverage company. Our Dairy Group is
the largest processor and distributor of milk and various other
dairy products in the United States. The Dairy Group
manufactures and sells its products under a variety of local and
regional brand names and under private labels. Our WhiteWave
Foods Company manufactures, markets and sells a variety of well
known soy, dairy and dairy-related nationally branded products
such as
Silk®
soymilk and cultured soy products, Horizon
Organic®
dairy products, International
Delight®
coffee creamers and LAND
OLAKES®
creamers and fluid dairy products. Our International Group is
one of the largest processors and distributors of fluid milk in
Spain and Portugal.
Our principal executive offices are located at 2515 McKinney
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201. Our telephone
number is (214) 303-3400. We maintain a worldwide web site
at www.deanfoods.com. We were incorporated in Delaware in
1994.
Segments and Operating Divisions
We have two reportable segments: the Dairy Group and WhiteWave
Foods Company. Our reportable segments and other operating
divisions are described below.
Our Dairy Group manufactures, markets and distributes a wide
variety of branded and private label dairy case products to
retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, schools and
governmental entities across the United States.
The Dairy Groups sales totaled approximately
$8.96 billion in 2005, or approximately 85% of our
consolidated sales. The following charts graphically depict the
Dairy Groups 2005 sales by product and by channel, and
indicate the percentage of private label versus company branded
sales in 2005.
|
|
| (1) |
Includes, among other things, regular milk, flavored milks,
buttermilk, half-and-half, whipping cream, dairy coffee creamers
and ice cream mix. |
| |
| (2) |
Includes ice cream and ice cream novelties. |
| |
| (3) |
Includes yogurt, cottage cheese, sour cream and dairy-based dips. |
| |
| (4) |
Includes fruit juice, fruit-flavored drinks and water. |
|
|
| (5) Includes, among other things, items for resale such as butter, cheese and eggs. |
. |
|
|
| (6) |
Such as restaurants, hotels and other foodservice outlets. |
1
Products not sold under private labels are sold under the Dairy
Groups local and regional proprietary or licensed brands.
Our local and regional proprietary and licensed brands include
the following:
East Region(1)
Barbers®
Broughton®
Borden®
(licensed brand)
Country
Charm®
Country
Delite®
Country
Fresh®
Country
Love®
Dairy
Fresh®
Deans®
Fieldcrest®
Garelick
Farms®
LAND
OLAKES®
(licensed brand)
Lehigh
Valley®
Louis
Trauth®
Maplehurst®
Mayfield®
McArthur®
Meadowbrook®
Melody
Farms®
Natures
Pride®
Pet®
(licensed brand)
Puritytm
Reitertm
Saunderstm
Schenkels
All*Startm
Sealtest®
(licensed brand)
Shenandoahs
Pride®
Strohs®
Swiss
Premiumtm
TG
Lee®
Tuscan®
Verifine®
West Region(1)
Alta
Dena®
Barbes®
Berkeley
Farmstm
Borden®
(licensed brand)
Browns®
Country
Charm®
Creamlandtm
Deans®
Foremosttm
(licensed brand)
Gandystm
Hygeia®
Imo®
Meadow
Gold®
Mile
Hightm
Model®
Mountain
High®
Oak
Farms®
Pricestm
Robinson®
Schepps®
Swiss
Viva®
Morningstar Region(1)
Dairy
Fresh®
Kohlertm
LAND
OLAKES®
(licensed brand)
Shenandoahs
Pride®
Skinny
Cowtm
(licensed brand)
|
|
| (1) |
Our Dairy Group operates in a generally decentralized manner
organized by region. |
The Dairy Group sells its products primarily on a local or
regional basis through its local and regional sales forces,
although some national customer relationships are coordinated by
the Dairy Groups corporate sales department. Most of the
Dairy Groups customers, including its largest customer
(Wal-Mart, including its subsidiaries, such as Sams Club,
which accounted for approximately 15.6% of the Dairy
Groups 2005 sales), purchase products from the Dairy Group
either by purchase order or pursuant to contracts that are
generally terminable at will by the customer.
Our Dairy Group currently operates 97 manufacturing facilities
in 34 states. For more information about facilities in the
Dairy Group, see Item 2. Properties.
Due to the perishable nature of the Dairy Groups products,
our Dairy Group delivers the majority of its products from its
facilities directly to its customers stores in
refrigerated trucks or trailers that we own or lease. This form
of delivery is called a direct store delivery or
DSD system. We believe our Dairy Group has one of
the most extensive refrigerated DSD systems in the United States.
2
The primary raw material used in our Dairy Group is raw milk. We
purchase our raw milk primarily from farmers cooperatives,
typically pursuant to requirements contracts (with no minimum
purchase obligation). Raw milk is generally readily available.
The minimum price of raw milk is regulated in most parts of the
country by the federal government. Several states also regulate
raw milk pricing through their own programs. For more
information about raw milk pricing in the United States, see
Government Regulation Milk
Industry Regulation and Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Known
Trends and Uncertainties Prices of Raw Materials and
Other Inputs. Other raw materials used by the Dairy Group,
such as juice concentrates and sweeteners, in addition to
packaging supplies, are generally available from numerous
suppliers and we are not dependent on any single supplier for
these materials. Certain of our Dairy Groups raw materials
and packaging supplies are purchased under long-term contracts
in order to obtain lower costs. The prices of our raw materials
increase and decrease based on supply and demand.
The Dairy Group generally increases or decreases the prices of
its fluid dairy products on a monthly basis in correlation to
fluctuations in the costs of raw materials, packaging supplies
and delivery costs. However, in some cases, we are competitively
or contractually constrained with respect to the means and/or
timing of price increases. This can have a negative impact on
the Dairy Groups profitability.
The dairy industry is a mature industry that has traditionally
been characterized by slow to flat growth, low profit margins,
fragmentation and excess capacity. Excess capacity resulted from
the development of more efficient manufacturing techniques, the
establishment of captive dairy manufacturing operations by some
grocery retailers and declining demand for fluid milk products.
From 1990 through 2001, the dairy industry experienced
significant consolidation, led by us. Consolidation has resulted
in lower operating costs, less excess capacity and greater
efficiency. However, per capita consumption of traditional fluid
dairy products has continued to decline. According to the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA), per capita
consumption of fluid milk and cream decreased by over 15% from
1990 to the end of 2004, although total consumption has remained
relatively flat over the same period due to population
increases. Therefore, volume growth across the industry
generally remains flat to modest, profit margins generally
remain low and excess manufacturing capacity continues to exist.
In this environment, price competition is particularly intense,
as smaller processors struggle to retain enough volume to cover
their fixed costs. In response to this dynamic, and due to the
significant competitive pressure caused by the ongoing
consolidation among food retailers, many processors, including
us, are now placing an increased emphasis on product
differentiation and cost reduction in an effort to increase
consumption, sales and margins.
Our Dairy Group has several competitors in each of our major
product and geographic markets. Competition between dairy
processors for shelf-space with retailers is based primarily on
price, service and quality, while competition for consumer sales
is based on a variety of factors such as brand recognition,
price, taste preference and quality. Dairy products also compete
with many other beverages and nutritional products for consumer
sales.
For more financial information about our Dairy Groups
recent operations, see Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
WhiteWave Foods Company develops, manufactures, markets and
sells a variety of nationally branded soy, dairy and
dairy-related products, such as Silk soymilk and cultured
soy products, Horizon Organic dairy products,
International Delight coffee creamers and LAND
OLAKES creamers and fluid dairy products. WhiteWave
Foods Company also sells The Organic
Cow®
organic dairy products; White
Wave®
and Tofu
Town®
branded tofu and
Hersheys®
milks and milkshakes. We license the LAND OLAKES
and Hersheys names from third parties.
WhiteWave Foods Companys sales totaled approximately
$1.14 billion in 2005, or approximately 11% of our
consolidated sales. WhiteWave Foods Company sells its products
to a variety of customers, including
3
grocery stores, club stores, natural foods stores, mass
merchandisers, convenience stores and foodservice outlets. The
following charts graphically depict WhiteWave Foods
Companys sales by brand and by channel:
|
|
| (1) |
Other brands include Hersheys milk and milk shakes,
The Organic Cow organic dairy products and White Wave
and Tofu Town tofu. |
WhiteWave Foods Company sells its products through its internal
sales force and through independent brokers. The majority of
WhiteWave Foods Companys products including sales to its
largest customer (Wal-Mart including its subsidiaries, such as
Sams Club, which accounted for approximately 14.4% of
WhiteWave Foods Companys 2005 sales) are sold pursuant to
customer purchase order or pursuant to contracts that are
generally terminable at will by the customer.
In 2005, approximately 70% of the products sold by WhiteWave
Foods Company were manufactured in facilities operated by either
WhiteWave Foods Company or our Dairy Group. The remaining 30%
were manufactured by third-party manufacturers under processing
agreements. WhiteWave Foods Company currently operates seven
manufacturing facilities, including three facilities that were
previously operated by our Dairy Group. The majority of
WhiteWave Foods Companys products are delivered by common
carrier to customer warehouses, although some products are
distributed through third-party distributors or through our
Dairy Groups DSD system.
The primary raw materials used in our soy-based products are
organic soybeans and organic soybean concentrate. Organic
soybeans are generally available from several suppliers and we
are not dependent on any single supplier for these products. We
have entered into supply agreements for organic soybeans, which
we believe will meet our needs in 2006. Generally, these
agreements provide pricing at fixed levels. The primary raw
material used in our organic milk-based products is organic raw
milk. We currently purchase organic raw milk from a network of
over 325 dairy farmers across the United States. We also produce
certain of our own organic raw milk needs in the U.S. at
two organic farms that we own and operate. However, the demand
for organic raw milk exceeds the supply available. As a result,
at times we are forced to limit quantities we ship to our
customers. We are currently taking steps to increase the supply
of organic raw milk available to us; however, there can be no
assurance as to when supply will fully meet demand because the
process of converting a farm from conventional production to
organic production takes three years. The growth of our organic
dairy business will depend on us being able to obtain sufficient
quantities of organic raw milk. We expect to continue to limit
quantities available to customers of organic milk into the
second quarter of 2006. We generally enter into supply
agreements with dairy farmers with typical terms of one to two
years, which obligate us to purchase certain minimum quantities.
The primary raw material used in our LAND OLAKES
and other non-organic dairy products is raw milk. We
purchase raw milk from farmers cooperatives, typically
pursuant to requirements contracts (with no minimum purchase
obligation). Raw milk is generally readily available. The
minimum price of raw milk is regulated in most parts of the
country by the federal government. Several states also regulate
raw milk pricing through their own programs. Other raw materials
used in WhiteWave Foods Companys products, such as
flavorings, organic sugar and packaging materials, are generally
available from several suppliers and we are not dependent on any
single supplier for these materials. Certain of these raw
materials are purchased under contracts in order to obtain lower
costs. The prices of raw materials increase and decrease based
on supply and demand. For more information, see
Part II Item 7.
4
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Known Trends and
Uncertainties Prices of Raw Materials and Other
Inputs.
WhiteWave Foods Company has several competitors in each of its
product markets. Competition to obtain shelf-space with
retailers for a particular product is based primarily on the
expected or historical sales performance of the product compared
to its competitors. Also, in some cases, WhiteWave Foods Company
pays fees to retailers to obtain shelf-space for a particular
product. Competition for consumer sales is based on many
factors, including brand recognition, price, taste preferences
and quality. Consumer demand for soy and organic foods has grown
rapidly in recent years due to growing consumer confidence in
the health benefits of soy and organic foods, and WhiteWave
Foods Company has a leading position in the soy and organic
foods category. However, our soy and organic food products
compete with many other beverages and nutritional products for
consumer sales.
Effective January 1, 2006, Rachels Organic was
consolidated with our WhiteWave Foods Company segment. For more
information about WhiteWave Foods Company, see
Part II Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
International Group
Our International Group manufactures, markets and sells private
label and branded milk, butter and cream through its internal
sales force to retailers and distributors across Spain and
Portugal. We also own Rachels Organic, which markets and
sells organic dairy products across the United Kingdom under the
brand names Rachels
Organic®
and Divine
Rice®.
The International Groups sales totaled $399.8 million
in 2005, or approximately 4% of our consolidated sales.
The following charts graphically depict the International
Groups 2005 sales by product category and channel, and
indicate the percentage of private label sales versus company
branded sales in 2005.
|
|
| (1) |
Our International Groups largest customers in 2005 were
Carrefour, S.A., and J. Sainsbury, which accounted for
approximately 22.0% and 10.7% of the International Groups
2005 sales, respectively. |
| |
| (2) |
Including our proprietary
Celta®,
Campobueno®,
La Vaquera®
Milsani®
and Rachels Organic brands. |
Our International Group manufactures its products in five
facilities in Spain and Portugal. Rachels Organic has one
manufacturing facility located in Aberystwth, United Kingdom
which was moved to the WhiteWave Foods Company segment effective
January 1, 2006. For more information about our
International Group facilities, see Item 2.
Properties. Our International Group operates its business
primarily from its headquarters located in Pontedeume, Galicia,
Spain.
The long shelf life of our International Groups fluid milk
products allows delivery by common carrier. Most of the
International Groups customers purchase our products
either by purchase order or by contracts that are generally
terminable at will by the customer. Our International
Groups sales are slightly seasonal, with sales tending to
be lower in the third quarter.
The primary raw material used by our International Group is raw
milk. We purchase our raw milk from farmers cooperatives
and other intermediaries pursuant to formal and informal
contractual arrangements.
5
Raw milk production volume is regulated by European Union
quotas, which sometimes limit the availability of raw milk to
processors. The price of raw milk is defined solely by supply
and demand and can fluctuate widely. Our International Group
purchases its packaging materials from two leading suppliers.
Packaging materials represent a significant portion of our
International Groups raw material costs and are purchased
under long-term contracts in order to obtain lower costs.
The Iberian fluid dairy market, which includes Spain and
Portugal, is characterized by relatively high per capita
consumption and long shelf-life brick pack products
dominate the industry. The combination of these factors makes
the Iberian region one of the largest long shelf-life markets in
the world. The Iberian fluid dairy market has been characterized
over the past 20 years by slow growth in the core products
and faster growth for value-added products such as nutritionally
enriched milks. The Iberian fluid dairy industry is highly
competitive, with leading companies investing heavily in
innovation and branding. The industry has undergone significant
consolidation in the past 5 to 10 years leading to the
emergence of several national brands, including our Celta
brand. Our International Group competes with all the leading
fluid dairy processors operating in the Iberian region.
Competition between dairy processors for private label business
has intensified recently as a result of retailer consolidation,
and is based primarily on price, service and quality.
Competition for branded sales to consumers is based on a number
of factors, including brand recognition, price and quality.
Current Business Strategy
|
|
|
Maximize Dairy Group Performance |
As the largest dairy processor in the United States, our Dairy
Group is in a unique position to provide unmatched service,
convenience and value to our customers. We are intently focused
on maintaining and extending our Dairy Groups leadership
position by focusing on our customers needs.
In 2005, our Dairy Groups fresh milk volumes were up by
2.5% while total U.S. consumption was generally flat,
according to data published by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. We believe this increase in market share is an
indication of the success of our strategy. In 2006, we are
focused on maintaining and growing our Dairy Groups sales
volume by continuing to provide our customers with the highest
level of service, quality and value. Also in 2006, we intend to
begin a multi-year project designed to extend the competitive
advantage of our Dairy Group by further reducing our cost
structure, primarily through rationalizing our purchasing and
administrative functions and by investing in a new, more
efficient information technology platform.
|
|
|
Maximize the Performance of WhiteWave Foods Company |
In 2004, we began the process of consolidating the operations of
the three operating units that comprise our WhiteWave Foods
Company segment into a single business. We are building a
vertically integrated branded business with a focused product
portfolio, efficient manufacturing processes and an optimal
distribution system. During 2005, we appointed a new President
of our business, which was a key step in the development of a
consolidated leadership team for the organization. We also
completed the consolidation of the sales, marketing and research
and development organization and the supply chain integration is
in process. We consolidated most product manufacturing into five
primary facilities, three of which were transferred from our
Dairy Group in 2005, and we narrowed our network of co-packers.
In 2006, we will continue to focus on streamlining our product
portfolio, focusing on the most profitable opportunities, and on
continuing to maximize our production and distribution
processes. We are currently in the initial stages of
implementing the SAP platform across WhiteWave Foods Company,
which we expect will enable us to more effectively and
efficiently manage our supply chain and business processes.
|
|
|
Invest in the Growth and Profitability of our
Brands |
In 2006, we intend to continue to invest in aggressively
marketing our WhiteWave Foods Company brands, with an emphasis
on our largest and most successful brands: Silk, Horizon
Organic, International
6
Delight and LAND OLAKES. We will continue to
make capital expenditures allowing us to increase internal
manufacturing, which we believe will allow us to better manage
our working capital and increase profitability. In order to meet
the growth in demand for our organic dairy products we will
continue to expand our network of dairy farmers, as well as
increase our organic farming operations, as necessary.
Developments Since January 1, 2005
On June 27, 2005, we completed the spin-off
(Spin-off) of our indirect, majority-owned
subsidiary TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (TreeHouse).
Immediately prior to the Spin-off, we transferred to TreeHouse
(1) the businesses previously conducted by our Specialty
Foods Group segment, (2) the Mocha
Mix®
and
Second
Nature®
businesses previously conducted by WhiteWave Foods Company, and
(3) the foodservice salad dressings businesses previously
conducted by the Dairy Group and WhiteWave Foods Company. The
Spin-off was effected by means of a share dividend of the
TreeHouse common stock held by us to our stockholders of record
on June 20, 2005 (the Record Date). In the
distribution, our stockholders received one share of TreeHouse
common stock for every five shares of our common stock held by
them on the Record Date.
On August 22, 2005, we completed the sale of certain
tangible and intangible assets related to the production and
distribution of Maries dips and dressings and
Deans dips. We also licensed the Dean trademark to
Ventura Foods for use on certain non-dairy dips. The sales price
was approximately $194 million.
Both the TreeHouse Spin-off and the Maries dips and
dressings and Deans dips transactions were part of
our strategy to focus on our core dairy and branded businesses.
Prior periods have been revised to remove the results of our
former Specialty Foods Group segment and Mocha Mix, Second
Nature and private label dressings businesses and our
Maries dips and dressings and Deans
dips businesses, which have been reclassified as
discontinued operations.
On August 25, 2005, we announced that we had selected
Joseph E. Scalzo to serve as President and CEO of WhiteWave
Foods Company. Mr. Scalzo, most recently Group President,
Personal Care and Global Value Chain of the Gillette Company,
joined WhiteWave Foods Company on October 11, 2005.
On September 7, 2005, we announced the succession plan for
the President of our Dairy Group. Alan Bernon, the former Chief
Operating Officer of the Northeast region of our Dairy Group,
succeeded Pete Schenkel effective January 1, 2006.
Mr. Schenkel became Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors
effective January 1, 2006 and he will assist in the
transition of leadership of the Dairy Group through the end of
2007.
On October 14, 2005, we announced that Barry Fromberg,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will
resign from his position on April 1, 2006. We are currently
conducting a search for Mr. Frombergs successor.
Between July 1 and December 31, 2005, we spent
approximately $699.5 million to repurchase
18.9 million shares of our common stock for an average
price of $37.05 per share, excluding commissions and fees.
On August 10, 2005, and again on November 2, 2005, our
Board of Directors authorized increases in our stock repurchase
program in the aggregate amount of $600 million. Between
January 1, 2006 and March 6, 2006 we spent
approximately $15.3 million to purchase an additional
400,000 shares of our common stock for an average price of
$38.37, excluding commissions and fees. At March 6, 2006,
approximately $3.2 million remained available under our
stock repurchase authorization.
|
|
|
Facility Closing and Reorganization Activities |
In 2005, we recorded a charge of $38.6 million as part of
our ongoing costs savings initiative. The Dairy Group recorded a
charge of $25.3 million, which included the closing of two
facilities in 2005; we are consolidating the production from
these facilities into other Dairy Group facilities. Also in
2005, we made
7
significant progress toward the consolidation and optimization
of our WhiteWave Foods Company subsidiary. Specifically, we
consolidated WhiteWave Foods Companys sales, marketing and
research and development functions which resulted in a charge of
$10.2 million related to these activities. Also in 2005, we
began a project to reorganize our International Group operations
in response to a difficult operating environment including
eliminating and consolidating certain management, sales and
purchasing functions which resulted in a charge of
$3.1 million related to these activities. We expect to
incur additional charges related to all of these restructuring
plans of approximately $7.1 million, primarily in 2006.
These charges include the following costs:
|
|
|
| |
|
Workforce reductions as a result of facility closings, facility
reorganizations and consolidation of administrative functions; |
| |
| |
|
Shutdown costs, including those costs necessary to prepare
abandoned facilities for closure; |
| |
| |
|
Costs incurred after shutdown such as lease obligations or
termination costs, utilities and property taxes; |
| |
| |
|
Costs associated with the reorganization of WhiteWave Foods
Companys supply chain and distribution activities,
including termination of certain contractual agreements; and |
| |
| |
|
Write-downs of property, plant and equipment and other assets,
primarily for asset impairments as a result of facilities that
are no longer used in operations. The impairments relate
primarily to owned buildings, land and equipment at the
facilities, which are written down to their estimated fair value
and held for sale. |
See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information regarding our facility closing and
reorganization activities.
|
|
|
Amendment to Credit Facility |
In May 2005, we amended our senior credit facility to lower the
interest rate on the revolving credit facility and term loan.
With the amendment, both the revolving credit facility and term
loan bear interest, at our election, at the base rate plus a
margin that varies from zero to 25 basis points depending
on our credit ratings (as issued by Standard &
Poors and Moodys), or LIBOR plus a margin that
varies from 50 to 150 basis points, depending on our credit
ratings (as issued by Standard & Poors and
Moodys). On November 18, 2005, we again amended our
senior credit facility to change the maximum leverage covenant
to 4.35 to 1.00 through March 31, 2007, and 4.00 to 1.00
thereafter.
On December 14, 2005, we filed an immediately effective
shelf registration statement pursuant to which we registered
debt securities that we may issue in the future. If and when the
debt securities are issued, they will be unsecured obligations
and will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by all of our
wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries other than our receivables
securitization subsidiaries.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, we had the following employees:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
No. of | |
|
% of | |
| |
|
Employees | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Dairy Group
|
|
|
25,470 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
International Group
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
27,030 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Approximately 37% of the Dairy Groups and 18% of WhiteWave
Foods Companys employees participate in collective
bargaining agreements.
Government Regulation
As a manufacturer and distributor of food products, we are
subject to a number of food-related regulations, including the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated
there under by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). This comprehensive regulatory framework
governs the manufacture (including composition and ingredients),
labeling, packaging and safety of food in the United States. The
FDA:
|
|
|
| |
|
regulates manufacturing practices for foods through its current
good manufacturing practices regulations, |
| |
| |
|
specifies the standards of identity for certain foods, including
many of the products we sell, and |
| |
| |
|
prescribes the format and content of certain information
required to appear on food product labels. |
In addition, the FDA enforces the Public Health Service Act and
regulations issued there under, which authorize regulatory
activity necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission or
spread of communicable diseases. These regulations require, for
example, pasteurization of milk and milk products. We are
subject to numerous other federal, state and local regulations
involving such matters as the licensing and registration of
manufacturing facilities, enforcement by government health
agencies of standards for our products, inspection of our
facilities and regulation of our trade practices in connection
with the sale of food products.
We use quality control laboratories in our manufacturing
facilities to test raw ingredients. Product quality and
freshness are essential to the successful distribution of our
products. To monitor product quality at our facilities, we
maintain quality control programs to test products during
various processing stages. We believe our facilities and
manufacturing practices comply with all material government
regulations.
|
|
|
Employee Safety Regulations |
We are subject to certain safety regulations including
regulations issued pursuant to the U.S. Occupational Safety
and Health Act. These regulations require us to comply with
certain manufacturing safety standards to protect our employees
from accidents. We believe that we are in material compliance
with all employee safety regulations.
|
|
|
Environmental Regulations |
We are subject to various environmental regulations. Ammonia, a
refrigerant used extensively in our operations, is considered an
extremely hazardous substance pursuant to
U.S. federal environmental laws due to its toxicity. Also,
certain of our facilities discharge biodegradable wastewater
into municipal waste treatment facilities in excess of levels
permitted under local regulations. As a result, certain of our
subsidiaries are required to pay wastewater surcharges or to
construct wastewater pretreatment facilities. To date, such
wastewater surcharges have not had a material effect on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
We maintain above-ground or underground petroleum storage tanks
at many of our facilities. These tanks are periodically
inspected to determine compliance with applicable regulations.
We are required to make expenditures from time to time in order
to maintain compliance of these tanks. To date, such
expenditures have not had a material effect on our Consolidated
Financial Statements. In accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 47 Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, we recognized a
liability of $2.8 million as of December 31, 2005,
representing the estimated future cost of removing certain
underground fuel storage tanks. As we generally have ceased
construction of new underground fuel storage tanks, we do not
anticipate the impact of this Interpretation to be material in
future periods.
9
We believe that we are in material compliance with the
environmental regulations applicable to our business. We do not
expect environmental compliance to have a material impact on our
capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position in the
foreseeable future.
The federal government establishes minimum prices that we must
pay to producers in federally regulated areas for raw milk. Raw
milk contains primarily raw skim milk, in addition to a small
percentage of butterfat. The federal government establishes
separate minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat. Raw
milk delivered to our facilities is tested to determine the
percentage of butterfat, and we pay our suppliers separate
prices for the raw skim milk and butterfat based on the results
of these tests.
The federal governments minimum prices are calculated by
economic formula based on supply and demand and vary depending
on the processors geographic location or sales area and
the type of product manufactured using the raw product. Federal
minimum prices change monthly. Class I butterfat and raw
skim milk prices (which are the minimum prices we are required
to pay for butterfat and raw skim milk that is processed into
milk) and Class II raw skim milk prices (which are the
prices we are required to pay for raw skim milk that is
processed into products such as cottage cheese, creams,
creamers, ice cream and sour cream) for each month are announced
by the federal government by the 23rd day of the
immediately preceding month. Class II butterfat prices for
each month are announced on or before the fifth day after the
end of that month.
Some states have established their own rules for determining
minimum prices for raw milk. In addition to the federal or state
minimum prices, we also pay producer premiums, procurement costs
and other related charges that vary by location and vendor. A
few states also have retail pricing requirements.
In Spain, the government has established a quota system
regulating the amount of milk that can be sold by individual
farmers and farm cooperatives, which affects the prices we pay
for raw milk.
Our organic products are required to meet the standards set
forth in the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA) and
the regulations adopted thereunder by the National Organic
Standards Board. These regulations require strict methods of
production for organic food products and limit the ability of
food processors to use non organic or synthetic materials
in the production of organic foods or in the raising of organic
livestock.
Brief History
We commenced operations in 1988 through a predecessor entity.
Our original operations consisted solely of a packaged ice
business. Since then the following activity has occurred:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
December 1993
|
|
|
|
Acquired Suiza Dairy Corporation, a regional dairy processor
located in Puerto Rico. We then began acquiring other local and
regional U.S. dairy processors, growing our dairy business
rapidly primarily through acquisitions. |
| |
|
April 1996
|
|
|
|
Completed our initial public offering under our former name
Suiza Foods Corporation and began trading on NASDAQ
National Market. |
| |
|
January 1997
|
|
|
|
Completed a secondary offering. |
| |
|
March 1997
|
|
|
|
Began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. |
| |
|
August 1997
|
|
|
|
Acquired Franklin Plastics, Inc., a company engaged in the
business of manufacturing and selling plastic containers. After
the acquisition, we began acquiring other companies in the
plastic packaging industry. |
10
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
November 1997
|
|
|
|
Acquired Morningstar Foods Inc., whose business was a
predecessor to our WhiteWave Foods Company. This was our first
acquisition of a company with national brands. |
| |
|
April 1998
|
|
|
|
Sold our packaged ice operations. |
| |
|
May 1998
|
|
|
|
Acquired Continental Can Company, making us one of the largest
plastic packaging companies in the United States. |
| |
|
July 1999
|
|
|
|
Sold all of our U.S. plastic packaging operations to
Consolidated Container Company in exchange for cash and a
minority interest in the purchaser. |
| |
|
January 2000
|
|
|
|
Acquired Southern Foods Group, L.P., the third largest dairy
processor in the United States, making us the largest dairy
processor in the country. |
| |
|
February 2000
|
|
|
|
Acquired Leche Celta, one of the largest dairy processors in
Spain. |
| |
|
March and May 2000
|
|
|
|
Sold our European packaging operations. |
| |
|
December 2001
|
|
|
|
Acquired Dean Foods Company (Legacy Dean) and
changed our name from Suiza Foods Corporation to Dean Foods
Company. Legacy Dean changed its name to Dean Holding Company. |
| |
|
May 2002
|
|
|
|
Acquired the portion of White Wave, Inc. that we did not already
own. |
| |
|
January 2004
|
|
|
|
Acquired the portion of Horizon Organic that we did not already
own. |
| |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Consolidated our nationally branded business, including White
Wave, Horizon Organic and Dean National Brand Group into a
single operating unit called WhiteWave Foods Company. |
| |
|
June 2005
|
|
|
|
Spun-off our Specialty Foods Group segment to our shareholders. |
Minority Holdings
We own an approximately 25% interest, on a fully diluted basis,
in Consolidated Container Company (CCC), one of the
nations largest manufacturers of rigid plastic containers
and our largest supplier of plastic bottles and bottle
components. We have owned a minority interest in CCC since July
1999 when we sold our U.S. plastic packaging operations to
CCC. Vestar Capital Partners controls CCC through a majority
ownership interest. Less than 1% of CCC is owned indirectly by
Alan Bernon, President of our Dairy Group and a member of our
Board of Directors, and his brother Peter Bernon. Pursuant to
our agreements with Vestar, we control two of the eight seats on
CCCs Management Committee. We also have entered into
various supply agreements with CCC pursuant to which we have
agreed to purchase certain of our requirements for plastic
bottles and bottle components from CCC. In 2005, we spent
approximately $324.1 million on products purchased from
CCC. Because CCC has issued certain senior notes, CCC files
annual, quarterly and other reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. More information about CCC can be found on
its website at www.cccllc.com or in its filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission available at
www.sec.gov.
See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information about our investment in CCC.
Where You Can Get More Information
Our fiscal year ends on December 31. We furnish our
stockholders with annual reports containing audited financial
statements. In addition, we file annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Legacy Dean, which is now
known as Dean
11
Holding Company and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, also
files annual, quarterly and current reports with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
You may read and copy any reports, statements or other
information that we or Dean Holding Company file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission at the Securities and
Exchange Commissions Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. You can
request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating
fee, by writing to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the operation of the Public Reference
Room.
We file our reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission
electronically via the Securities and Exchange Commissions
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval system
(EDGAR). The Securities and Exchange Commission
maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and
information statements, and other information regarding
companies that file electronically with the Securities and
Exchange Commission via EDGAR. The address of this Internet site
is http://www.sec.gov.
We also make available free of charge through our website at
www.deanfoods.com our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current
reports on
Form 8-K, and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically
file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Our Code of Ethics, which is applicable to all of our employees
and directors, is available on our corporate website at
www.deanfoods.com, together with the Corporate Governance
Principles of our Board of Directors and the charters of all of
the Committees of our Board of Directors. Any waivers that we
may grant to our executive officers or directors under the Code
of Ethics, and any amendments to our Code of Ethics, will be
posted on our corporate website. If you would like hard copies
of any of these documents, or of any of our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, write or call us at:
|
|
| |
Dean Foods Company |
| |
2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1200 |
| |
Dallas, Texas 75201 |
| |
(214) 303-3400 |
| |
Attention: Investor Relations |
This report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
Statements that are not historical in nature are forward-looking
statements about our future that are not statements of
historical fact. Most of these statements are found in this
report under the following subheadings: Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk. In some cases, you can
identify these statements by terminology such as
may, should, could,
expects, seek to,
anticipates, plans,
believes, estimates,
intends, predicts, projects,
potential or continue or the negative of
such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements
are only predictions, and in evaluating them, you should
carefully consider the information above, including in
Known Trends and Uncertainties, as well
as the risks outlined below. Actual performance or results may
differ materially and adversely.
|
|
|
Reorganization of Our WhiteWave Foods Company Segment
Could Temporarily Adversely Affect the Performance of the
Segment |
In 2004, we began the process of consolidating the operations of
the three operating units that comprise our WhiteWave Foods
Company segment into a single business. We are building a
vertically integrated branded business with a focused product
portfolio, efficient manufacturing processes and an optimal
distribution system. During 2005, we appointed a new President
of our business, which was a key step in the development of a
consolidated leadership team for the organization. We also
completed the consolidation of
12
the sales, marketing and research and development organization
and the supply chain integration is in process. We consolidated
most product manufacturing into five primary facilities, three
of which were transferred from our Dairy Group in 2005, and we
narrowed our network of co-packers. In 2006, we will continue to
focus on streamlining our product portfolio, focusing on the
most profitable opportunities, and on continuing to maximize our
production and distribution processes. We are currently in the
initial stages of implementing the SAP platform across the
WhiteWave Foods Company, which we expect will enable us to more
effectively and efficiently manage our supply chain and business
processes. Our failure to successfully manage this process could
cause us to incur unexpected costs or to lose customers or
sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial results.
|
|
|
Recent Successes of Our Products Could Attract Increased
Competitive Activity, Which Could Impede Our Growth Rate and
Cost Us Sales and, in the Case of Organic Products, Put Pressure
on the Availability of Raw Materials |
Our Silk soymilk and Horizon Organic organic food
and beverage products have leading market shares in their
categories and have benefited in many cases from being the first
to introduce products in their categories. As soy and organic
products continue to gain in popularity with consumers, we
expect our products in these categories to continue to attract
competitors. Many large food and beverage companies have
substantially more resources than we do and they may be able to
market their soy and organic products more successfully than us,
which could cause our growth rate in these categories to be
slower than our forecast and could cause us to lose sales. The
increase in popularity of soy and organic milks is also
attracting private label competitors who sell their products at
a lower price. The success of private label brands could
adversely affect our sales and profitability. Finally, there is
a limited supply of organic raw materials in the United States,
especially organic soybeans and organic raw milk. New entrants
into our markets can reduce available supply and drive up costs.
Even without new entrants, our own growth can put pressure on
the availability and price of organic raw materials.
Our International Delight coffee creamer competes
intensely with Nestlé CoffeeMate business, and our
Hersheys milks and milkshakes compete intensely
with Nestlé Nesquik. Nestle has significantly
greater resources than we do, which allows them to promote their
products more aggressively. Our failure to successfully compete
with Nestle could have a material adverse effect on the sales
and profitability of our International Delight and/or our
Hersheys businesses.
|
|
|
Changes in Laws, Regulations and Accounting Standards
Could Have an Adverse Effect on Our Financial Results |
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign governmental
laws and regulations, including those promulgated by the United
States Food and Drug Administration, the United States
Department of Agriculture, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
numerous related regulations promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Changes in
federal, state or local laws, or the interpretations of such
laws and regulations may negatively impact our financial results
or our ability to market our products.
|
|
|
Loss of Rights to Any of Our Licensed Brands Could
Adversely Affect Our Sales and Profits |
We sell certain of our products under licensed brand names such
as
Borden®,
Hersheys, LAND OLAKES,
Pet®,
and others. In some cases, we have invested significant capital
in product development and marketing and advertising related to
these licensed brands. Should our rights to manufacture and sell
products under any of these names be terminated for any reason,
our financial performance and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
|
|
|
We Have Substantial Debt and Other Financial Obligations
and We May Incur Even More Debt |
We have substantial debt and other financial obligations and
significant unused borrowing capacity. See Part II
Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
13
We have pledged substantially all of our assets (including the
assets of our subsidiaries) to secure our indebtedness. Our high
debt level and related debt service obligations:
|
|
|
| |
|
require us to dedicate significant cash flow to the payment of
principal and interest on our debt which reduces the funds we
have available for other purposes, |
| |
| |
|
may limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes
in our business and market conditions, |
| |
| |
|
impose on us additional financial and operational
restrictions, and |
| |
| |
|
expose us to interest rate risk since a portion of our debt
obligations are at variable rates. |
The interest rate on our debt is based on our debt rating, as
issued by Standard & Poors and Moodys. We
have no ability to control the ratings issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys. A downgrade in
our debt rating could cause our interest rate to increase, which
could adversely affect our ability to achieve our targeted
profitability level, as well as our cash flow.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on our debt and other
financial obligations depends on our financial and operating
performance. Our financial and operating performance is subject
to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and
other factors, some of which are beyond our control. A
significant increase in interest rates could adversely impact
our net income. If we do not comply with the financial and other
restrictive covenants under our credit facilities, we may
default under them. Upon default, our lenders could accelerate
the indebtedness under the facilities, foreclose against their
collateral or seek other remedies, which would jeopardize our
ability to continue our current operations.
|
|
| Item 1B. |
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
14
Dairy Group
Our Dairy Group currently conducts its manufacturing operations
from the following facilities, most of which are owned:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number of | |
|
|
| Region |
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
East
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Birmingham, Alabama (2) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Miami, Florida |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Orange City, Florida |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando, Florida |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Baxley, Georgia |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Braselton, Georgia |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Belvidere, Illinois |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Chemung, Illinois |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Huntley, Illinois |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
OFallon, Illinois |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Rockford, Illinois |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington, Indiana |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester, Indiana |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Louisville, Kentucky |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Newport, Kentucky |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Bangor, Maine |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin, Massachusetts |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Lynn, Massachusetts |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Mendon, Massachusetts |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Detroit, Michigan |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Evart, Michigan |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Flint, Michigan |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Livonia, Michigan |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Thief River Falls, Minnesota |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbury, Minnesota |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Burlington, New Jersey |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Rensselaer, New York |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Hickory, North Carolina |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Winston-Salem, North Carolina |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Bismarck, North Dakota |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Akron, Ohio |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Marietta, Ohio |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Springfield, Ohio |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Toledo, Ohio |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Belleville, Pennsylvania |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Erie, Pennsylvania |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Lansdale, Pennsylvania |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Lebanon, Pennsylvania |
15
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number of | |
|
|
| Region |
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sharpsville, Pennsylvania |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Florence, South Carolina |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Athens, Tennessee |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Kingsport, Tennessee |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Nashville, Tennessee (2) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Portsmouth, Virginia |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Springfield, Virginia |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sheboygan, Wisconsin |
|
West
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
Buena Park, California (2) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
City of Industry, California |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Fullerton, California |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Hayward, California |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Riverside, California |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Tulare, California |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Delta, Colorado |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Denver, Colorado (3) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Englewood, Colorado |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Greeley, Colorado |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Hilo, Hawaii |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Honolulu, Hawaii |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Boise, Idaho |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
New Orleans, Louisiana |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Shreveport, Louisiana |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Billings, Montana |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Great Falls, Montana |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Kalispell, Montana |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Lincoln, Nebraska |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Reno, Nevada |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, Texas (2) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
El Paso, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Lubbock, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
McKinney, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
San Antonio, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sulphur Springs, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Waco, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Orem, Utah |
16
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number of | |
|
|
| Region |
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah |
|
Morningstar
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Decatur, Alabama |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Gustine, California |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Newington, Connecticut |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Murray, Kentucky |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
White Bear Lake, Minnesota |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
New Delhi, New York |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Sulphur Springs, Texas |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Richland Center, Wisconsin |
Each of the Dairy Groups manufacturing facilities also
serves as a distribution facility. In addition, our Dairy Group
has numerous distribution branches located across the country,
some of which are owned but most of which are leased. The Dairy
Groups headquarters are located in Dallas, Texas in leased
premises.
WhiteWave Foods Company
WhiteWave Foods Company currently conducts its manufacturing
operations from the following facilities, all but one of which
is owned:
|
|
|
| |
|
City of Industry, California |
| |
|
Boulder, Colorado |
| |
|
Jacksonville, Florida |
| |
|
Bridgeton, New Jersey |
| |
|
Cedar City, Utah |
| |
|
Mt. Crawford, Virginia |
| |
|
Aberystwyth, United Kingdom* |
|
|
| * |
Effective January 1, 2006, this facility was transferred to
our WhiteWave Foods Company segment in connection with the
transition of responsibilities for Rachels Organic to
WhiteWave Foods Companys management team. |
WhiteWave Foods Company also owns two organic dairy farms
located in Paul, Idaho and Kennedyville, Maryland.
WhiteWave Foods Companys headquarters are located in
leased premises in Broomfield, Colorado.
International Group
Our International Group currently manufactures its products from
facilities in the following locations, all of which are owned:
|
|
|
| |
|
Alpiarca, Portugal |
| |
|
Avila, Spain |
| |
|
Meira, Spain |
| |
|
Meruelo, Spain |
| |
|
Pontedeume, Spain |
The International Groups headquarters are located in owned
premises in Pontedeume, Spain.
Corporate
Our corporate headquarters are located in leased premises at
2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201.
17
|
|
| Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
We are not currently party to, nor are our properties the
subject of, any material pending legal proceedings. However, we
are party from time to time to certain claims, litigation,
audits and investigations. We believe that we have established
adequate reserves to satisfy any potential liability that is
reasonably expected under all claims, litigations, audits and
investigations that are pending. The settlement of any pending
or threatened matter is not expected to have a material adverse
impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
|
|
| Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matter was submitted by us during the fourth quarter of 2005
to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of
proxies or otherwise.
18
PART II
|
|
| Item 5. |
Market for Our Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ National Market on
April 17, 1996, and continued trading on the NASDAQ until
March 5, 1997, when it began trading on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SZA. We changed our
trading symbol to DF effective December 24,
2001. The following table sets forth the high and low sales
prices of our common stock as quoted on the New York Stock
Exchange for the last two fiscal years. At March 6, 2006,
there were approximately 5,910 record holders of our common
stock.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
36.86 |
|
|
$ |
31.15 |
|
| |
Second Quarter
|
|
|
37.40 |
|
|
|
32.76 |
|
| |
Third Quarter
|
|
|
37.44 |
|
|
|
29.87 |
|
| |
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
33.25 |
|
|
|
28.46 |
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
|
35.60 |
|
|
|
31.74 |
|
| |
Second Quarter
|
|
|
41.07 |
|
|
|
33.87 |
|
| |
Third Quarter
|
|
|
38.86 |
|
|
|
34.80 |
|
| |
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
39.45 |
|
|
|
34.45 |
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First Quarter (through March 6, 2006)
|
|
|
38.80 |
|
|
|
37.22 |
|
On June 27, 2005, we declared a stock dividend related to
the Spin-off of TreeHouse Foods, which decreased our stock
price. No adjustment has been made to the historical stock
prices related to the impact of the stock dividend. See
Developments Since January 1, 2005
Discontinued Operations.
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common
stock. Our current intention is to retain all earnings to fund
working capital requirements, capital expenditures and scheduled
debt repayments, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends
on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Moreover, our
senior credit facility contains certain restrictions on our
ability to pay cash dividends. See Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Current Debt Obligations and
Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information regarding the terms of our senior credit facility.
On September 15, 1998, our Board of Directors authorized a
stock repurchase program of up to $100 million. On
September 28, and again on November 17, 1999, the
Board increased the program by an aggregate amount of
$200 million. On May 19 and again on November 2, 2000,
the Board authorized additional increases in the aggregate
amount of $200 million. On January 8 and again on
February 12, 2003, the Board authorized additional
increases by an aggregate amount of $300 million. On
September 7, 2004, the Board authorized an additional
increase of $200 million and on November 2, 2004, the
Board authorized an additional increase of $100 million. On
August 10, 2005 and again on November 2, 2005, our
Board authorized increases in our stock repurchase program in
the aggregate amount of $600 million. Authorizations under
our stock repurchase program totaled $1.70 billion at
December 31, 2005, of which $18.5 million remained
available for repurchases under our program at December 31,
2005.
19
The following table summarizes the repurchase of our common
stock during 2005:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
At End of Period, | |
|
(or Approximate | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Dollar Value) of | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) | |
|
Shares (or Units) | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as | |
|
that May Yet | |
| |
|
Total Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
be Purchased | |
| |
|
Shares (or Units) | |
|
Price Paid | |
|
Announced Plans | |
|
Under the Plans | |
| Period(1) |
|
Purchased | |
|
Per Share(2) | |
|
or Programs | |
|
or Programs(3) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
July 2005
|
|
|
1,907,100 |
|
|
$ |
36.09 |
|
|
|
53,008,566 |
|
|
$ |
49.2 million |
|
|
August 2005
|
|
|
3,927,600 |
|
|
|
35.78 |
|
|
|
56,936,166 |
|
|
|
208.7 million |
|
|
September 2005
|
|
|
4,091,300 |
|
|
|
37.08 |
|
|
|
61,027,466 |
|
|
|
57.0 million |
|
|
October 2005
|
|
|
1,422,500 |
|
|
|
37.93 |
|
|
|
62,449,966 |
|
|
|
3.0 million |
|
|
November 2005
|
|
|
5,995,400 |
|
|
|
37.44 |
|
|
|
68,445,366 |
|
|
|
78.5 million |
|
|
December 2005
|
|
|
1,537,400 |
|
|
|
39.02 |
|
|
|
69,982,766 |
|
|
|
18.5 million |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,881,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Repurchases during 2005 were made only in the months listed. |
| |
| (2) |
Excludes fees and commissions paid on stock repurchases. |
| |
| (3) |
Amount represents maximum amount authorized for share
repurchases. The amount can be increased by actions of our Board
of Directors. |
20
|
|
| Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
The following selected financial data as of and for each of the
five years in the period ended December 31, 2005 has been
derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The
selected financial data do not purport to indicate results of
operations as of any future date or for any future period. The
selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands except share data) | |
|
Operating data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net sales(1)
|
|
$ |
10,505,560 |
|
|
$ |
10,036,277 |
|
|
$ |
8,390,985 |
|
|
$ |
8,202,248 |
|
|
$ |
5,928,452 |
|
| |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
7,919,252 |
|
|
|
7,641,368 |
|
|
|
6,214,729 |
|
|
|
6,082,977 |
|
|
|
4,547,885 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,586,308 |
|
|
|
2,394,909 |
|
|
|
2,176,256 |
|
|
|
2,119,271 |
|
|
|
1,380,567 |
|
| |
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,561,688 |
|
|
|
1,450,480 |
|
|
|
1,290,728 |
|
|
|
1,246,534 |
|
|
|
790,651 |
|
| |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
372,750 |
|
|
|
333,179 |
|
|
|
304,422 |
|
|
|
318,479 |
|
|
|
175,885 |
|
| |
|
Amortization of intangibles(2)
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
5,173 |
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
6,224 |
|
|
|
49,823 |
|
| |
|
Facility closing and reorganization costs
|
|
|
38,583 |
|
|
|
24,575 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
19,050 |
|
|
|
9,550 |
|
| |
|
Other operating income(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,899 |
) |
|
|
(68,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,305 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,979,217 |
|
|
|
1,807,508 |
|
|
|
1,541,823 |
|
|
|
1,590,287 |
|
|
|
1,008,604 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
607,091 |
|
|
|
587,401 |
|
|
|
634,433 |
|
|
|
528,984 |
|
|
|
371,963 |
|
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest expense(4)
|
|
|
168,984 |
|
|
|
198,900 |
|
|
|
173,945 |
|
|
|
188,990 |
|
|
|
103,822 |
|
| |
Financing charges on trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,164 |
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
|
33,581 |
|
| |
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
|
23,620 |
|
| |
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(789 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
|
|
2,953 |
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
168,195 |
|
|
|
198,530 |
|
|
|
185,335 |
|
|
|
233,420 |
|
|
|
165,818 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
438,896 |
|
|
|
388,871 |
|
|
|
449,098 |
|
|
|
295,564 |
|
|
|
206,145 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
166,423 |
|
|
|
149,710 |
|
|
|
173,559 |
|
|
|
106,589 |
|
|
|
75,225 |
|
|
Minority interest in earnings(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
31,431 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
272,473 |
|
|
|
239,161 |
|
|
|
275,539 |
|
|
|
188,945 |
|
|
|
99,489 |
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
38,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
|
|
46,213 |
|
|
|
80,164 |
|
|
|
56,221 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
329,083 |
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
|
236,935 |
|
|
|
111,276 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax(6)
|
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,519 |
) |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
327,531 |
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
175,416 |
|
|
$ |
109,830 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
| |
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
| |
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
| |
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
| |
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.38 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
146,673,322 |
|
|
|
154,635,979 |
|
|
|
145,201,412 |
|
|
|
135,031,274 |
|
|
|
84,454,194 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
|
153,438,636 |
|
|
|
160,704,576 |
|
|
|
160,695,670 |
|
|
|
163,163,904 |
|
|
|
110,676,222 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends(7)
|
|
|
3.01 |
x |
|
|
2.84 |
x |
|
|
3.07 |
x |
|
|
2.32 |
x |
|
|
2.76x |
|
|
Balance sheet data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
7,050,884 |
|
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
|
$ |
6,992,536 |
|
|
$ |
6,582,266 |
|
|
$ |
6,691,897 |
|
| |
Long-term debt(8)
|
|
|
3,436,835 |
|
|
|
3,251,728 |
|
|
|
2,787,984 |
|
|
|
2,724,100 |
|
|
|
3,064,363 |
|
| |
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
225,636 |
|
|
|
322,378 |
|
|
|
257,111 |
|
|
|
288,242 |
|
|
|
169,754 |
|
| |
Mandatorily redeemable convertible trust issued preferred
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585,177 |
|
|
|
584,605 |
|
| |
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,872,079 |
|
|
|
2,663,599 |
|
|
|
2,543,979 |
|
|
|
1,643,293 |
|
|
|
1,475,880 |
|
21
|
|
| (1) |
Net sales have been restated to reflect the adoption of Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 01-09
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer. The net effect was to decrease net sales by
$33.7 million in 2001. There was no impact on our net
income as a result of the adoption of this issue. |
| |
| (2) |
On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which
requires, among other things, that goodwill and other intangible
assets with indefinite lives no longer be amortized and that
recognized intangible assets with finite lives be amortized over
their respective useful lives. As required by
SFAS No. 142, our results for periods prior to 2002
have not been restated. |
| |
| (3) |
Results for 2004 include a gain of $5.9 million primarily
related to the settlement of litigation. Results for 2003
include a gain of $66.2 million on the sale of our frozen
pre-whipped topping and frozen creamer operations and a gain of
$2.5 million related to the divestiture of the 11
facilities in 2001 in connection with our acquisition of Legacy
Dean. Results for 2001 include a gain of $47.5 million on
the divestiture of 11 facilities offset by an expense of
$28.5 million resulting from a payment to a supplier as
consideration for modifications to an agreement and an
impairment charge of $1.7 million on a water plant. |
| |
| (4) |
Results for 2004 include a charge of $32.6 million to
write-off deferred financing costs related to the refinancing of
our credit facility. Results for 2001 and 2000 have been
restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 145
Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64,
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical
Corrections. Gains and losses that were previously
recorded as extraordinary items related to the early
extinguishment of debt, which were a $7.3 million loss in
2001 and a $7.7 million gain in 2000, have been
reclassified to interest expense. There was no effect on net
income. |
| |
| (5) |
In December 2001, in connection with our acquisition of Legacy
Dean, we purchased Dairy Farmers of Americas 33.8%
interest in our Dairy Group. |
| |
| (6) |
In the fourth quarter of 2005, we adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. (FIN) 47 Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations. If FIN 47
had always been in effect, we would have expensed this amount
for depreciation in periods prior to January 1, 2005. |
| |
| (7) |
For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and preferred stock dividends,
earnings represents income before income taxes plus
fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on
all debt, amortization of deferred financing costs and the
portion of rental expense that we believe is representative of
the interest component of rent expense. |
| |
| (8) |
Includes amounts outstanding under subsidiary lines of credit
and the current portion of long-term debt. |
22
|
|
| Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Business Overview
We are a leading food and beverage company. Our Dairy Group is
the largest processor and distributor of milk and various other
dairy products in the United States. The Dairy Group
manufactures and sells its products under a variety of local and
regional brand names and under private labels. Our WhiteWave
Foods Company manufactures, markets and sells a variety of well
known soy, dairy and dairy-related nationally branded products
such as
Silk®
soymilk and cultured soy products, Horizon
Organic®
dairy products, International
Delight®
coffee creamers and LAND
OLAKES®
creamers and fluid dairy products. Our International Group is
one of the largest processors and distributors of fluid milk in
Spain and Portugal.
Dairy Group Our Dairy Group segment is our
largest segment, with approximately 85% of our consolidated
sales in 2005. Our Dairy Group manufactures, markets and
distributes a wide variety of branded and private label dairy
case products, such as milk, cream, ice cream, cultured dairy
products and juices to retailers, distributors, foodservice
outlets, schools and governmental entities across the United
States. Due to the perishable nature of the Dairy Groups
products, our Dairy Group delivers the majority of its products
directly to its customers stores in refrigerated trucks or
trailers that we own or lease. This form of delivery is called a
direct store delivery or DSD system and
we believe we have one of the most extensive refrigerated DSD
systems in the United States. The Dairy Group sells its products
primarily on a local or regional basis through its local and
regional sales forces, although some national customer
relationships are coordinated by the Dairy Groups
corporate sales department. Most of the Dairy Groups
customers, including its largest customer, purchase products
from the Dairy Group either by purchase order or pursuant to
contracts that are generally terminable at will by the customer.
The dairy industry is a mature industry that has traditionally
been characterized by slow to flat growth, low profit margins,
fragmentation and excess capacity. Excess capacity resulted from
the development of more efficient manufacturing techniques, the
establishment of captive dairy manufacturing operations by some
grocery retailers and declining demand for fluid milk products.
From 1990 through 2001, the dairy industry experienced
significant consolidation, led by us. Consolidation has resulted
in lower operating costs, less excess capacity and greater
efficiency. However, consumption of traditional fluid dairy
products has continued to decline. According to the United
States Department of Agriculture, per capita consumption of
fluid milk and cream decreased by over 15% from 1990 to the end
of 2004, although total consumption has remained relatively flat
over the same period due to population increases. Therefore,
volume sales growth across the industry generally remains flat
to modest, profit margins generally remain low and excess
manufacturing capacity continues to exist. In this environment,
price competition is particularly intense, as smaller processors
struggle to retain enough volume to cover their fixed costs. In
response to this dynamic, in addition to the significant
competitive pressure caused by the ongoing consolidation among
food retailers, many processors, including us, are now placing
an increased emphasis on product differentiation, and cost
reduction in an effort to increase consumption, sales and
margins.
Our Dairy Group has several competitors in each of our major
product and geographic markets. Competition between dairy
processors for shelf-space with retailers is based primarily on
price, service and quality, while competition for consumer sales
is based on a variety of factors such as brand recognition,
price, taste preference and quality. Dairy products also compete
with many other beverages and nutritional products for consumer
sales.
WhiteWave Foods WhiteWave Foods Company
manufactures, develops, markets and sells a variety of
nationally-branded soy, dairy and dairy-related products, such
as Silk soymilk and cultured soy products; Horizon
Organic dairy and other products; International Delight
coffee creamers; and LAND OLAKES creamers and
fluid dairy products. WhiteWave Foods Company also sells The
Organic
Cow®
organic dairy products; White
Wave®
and Tofu
Town®
branded tofu and
Hersheys®
milks and milkshakes. We license the LAND OLAKES
and Hersheys names from third parties.
WhiteWave Foods Company sells its products to a variety of
customers, including grocery stores, club stores, natural foods
stores, mass merchandisers, convenience stores and foodservice
outlets. WhiteWave
23
Foods Company sells its products through its internal sales
force and through independent brokers. Most of the WhiteWave
Foods Companys customers, including its largest customer,
purchase products from the Dairy Group either by purchase order
or pursuant to contracts that are generally terminable at will
by the customer.
WhiteWave Foods Company has several competitors in each of its
product markets. Competition to obtain shelf-space with
retailers for a particular product is based primarily on the
expected or historical sales performance of the product compared
to its competitors. In some cases, WhiteWave Foods Company pays
fees to retailers to obtain shelf-space for a particular
product. Competition for consumer sales is based on many
factors, including brand recognition, price, taste preferences
and quality. Consumer demand for soy and organic foods has grown
rapidly in recent years due to growing consumer confidence in
the health benefits of soy and organic foods, and WhiteWave
Foods Company has a leading position in the soy and organic
foods category. However, our soy and organic food products
compete with many other beverages and nutritional products for
consumer sales.
International Group Our International Group,
which consists of Leche Celta and Rachels Organic, does
not qualify as a reportable segment. Leche Celta manufactures,
markets and sells private label and branded milk, butter and
cream through its internal sales force to retailers and
distributors across Spain and Portugal. Rachels Organic
markets and sells organic dairy products across the United
Kingdom under the Rachels
Organic®
and Divine
Rice®
brand names. Effective January 1, 2006, Rachels
Organic was consolidated with our WhiteWave Foods Company
segment.
Recent Developments
On June 27, 2005, we completed the spin-off
(Spin-off) of our indirect, majority-owned
subsidiary TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (TreeHouse).
Immediately prior to the Spin-off, we transferred to TreeHouse
(1) the businesses previously conducted by our Specialty
Foods Group segment, (2) the Mocha
Mix®
and Second
Nature®
businesses previously conducted by WhiteWave Foods Company, and
(3) the foodservice salad dressings businesses previously
conducted by the Dairy Group and WhiteWave Foods Company. The
Spin-off was effected by means of a share dividend of the
TreeHouse common stock held by us to our stockholders of record
on June 20, 2005 (the Record Date). In the
distribution, our stockholders received one share of TreeHouse
common stock for every five shares of our common stock held by
them on the Record Date.
On August 22, 2005, we completed the sale of certain
tangible and intangible assets related to the production and
distribution of Maries dips and dressings and
Deans dips. We also licensed the Dean trademark to
Ventura Foods for use on certain non-dairy dips. The sales price
was approximately $194 million.
Both the TreeHouse Spin-off and the Maries dips and
dressings and Deans dips transactions were part of
our strategy to focus on our core dairy and branded businesses.
Prior periods have been revised to remove the results of our
former Specialty Foods Group segment and Mocha Mix, Second
Nature and private label dressings businesses and our
Maries dips and dressings and Deans
dips businesses, which have been reclassified as
discontinued operations.
On August 25, 2005, we announced that we had selected
Joseph E. Scalzo to serve as President and CEO of WhiteWave
Foods Company. Mr. Scalzo, most recently Group President,
Personal Care and Global Value Chain of the Gillette Company,
joined WhiteWave Foods Company on October 11, 2005.
On September 7, 2005, we announced the succession plan for
the President of our Dairy Group. Alan Bernon, the former Chief
Operating Officer of the Northeast region of our Dairy Group,
succeeded Pete Schenkel effective January 1, 2006.
Mr. Schenkel became Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors
effective January 1, 2006, and he will assist in the
transition of leadership of the Dairy Group through the end of
2007.
24
On October 14, 2005, we announced that Barry Fromberg,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, will
resign from his position on April 1, 2006. We are currently
conducting a search for Mr. Frombergs successor.
Between July 1 and December 31, 2005, we spent
approximately $699.5 million to repurchase
18.9 million shares of our common stock for an average
price of $37.05 per share, excluding commissions and fees.
On August 10, 2005, and again on November 2, 2005 our
Board of Directors authorized increases in our stock repurchase
program in the aggregate amount of $600 million. Between
January 1, 2006 and March 6, 2006 we spent
approximately $15.3 million to repurchase an additional
400,000 shares of our common stock for an average price of
$38.37, excluding commissions and fees. At March 6, 2006,
approximately $3.2 million remained available under our
stock repurchase authorization.
|
|
|
Facility Closing and Reorganization Activities |
In 2005, we recorded a charge of $38.6 million as part of
our ongoing costs savings initiative. The Dairy Group recorded a
charge of $25.3 million which included the closing of two
facilities in 2005; we are consolidating production from these
facilities into other Dairy Group facilities. Also in 2005, we
made significant progress toward the consolidation and
optimization of our WhiteWave Foods Company subsidiary.
Specifically, we consolidated WhiteWave Foods Companys
sales, marketing and research and development functions, which
resulted in a charge of $10.2 million related to these
activities. Also in 2005, we began a project to reorganize our
International Group operations in response to a difficult
operating environment, including eliminating and consolidating
certain management, sales and purchasing functions, which
resulted in a charge of $3.1 million related to these
activities. We expect to incur additional charges related to all
of these restructuring plans of approximately $7.1 million,
primarily in 2006. These charges include the following costs:
|
|
|
| |
|
Workforce reductions as a result of facility closings, facility
reorganizations and consolidation of administrative functions; |
| |
| |
|
Shutdown costs, including those costs necessary to prepare
abandoned facilities for closure; |
| |
| |
|
Costs incurred after shutdown, such as lease obligations or
termination costs, utilities and property taxes; |
| |
| |
|
Costs associated with the reorganization of WhiteWave Foods
Companys supply chain and distribution activities,
including termination of certain contractual agreements; and |
| |
| |
|
Write-downs of property, plant and equipment and other assets,
primarily for asset impairments as a result of facilities that
are no longer used in operations. The impairments relate
primarily to owned buildings, land and equipment at the
facilities, which are written down to their estimated fair value
and held for sale. |
See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information regarding our facility closing and
reorganization activities.
|
|
|
Amendment to Credit Facility |
In May 2005, we amended our senior credit facility to lower the
interest rate on the revolving credit facility and term loan.
With the amendment, both the revolving credit facility and term
loan bear interest, at our election, at the base rate plus a
margin that varies from zero to 25 basis points depending
on our credit ratings (as issued by Standard &
Poors and Moodys), or LIBOR plus a margin that
varies from 50 to 150 basis points, depending on our credit
ratings (as issued by Standard & Poors and
Moodys). On November 18, 2005, we again amended our
senior credit facility to change the maximum leverage covenant
to 4.35 to 1.00 through March 31, 2007, and 4.00 to 1.00
thereafter.
25
On December 14, 2005, we filed an immediately effective
shelf registration statement pursuant to which we registered
debt securities that we may issue in the future. If and when the
debt securities are issued, they will be unsecured obligations
and will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by all of our
wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries other than our receivables
securitization subsidiaries.
Results of Operations
The following table presents certain information concerning our
financial results, including information presented as a
percentage of net sales.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
10,505.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
10,036.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,391.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
7,919.3 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
|
7,641.4 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
6,214.8 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,586.3 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
2,394.9 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
2,176.2 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,561.7 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
1,450.5 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
1,290.7 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
|
372.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
333.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
304.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
| |
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Facility closing and reorganization costs
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
| |
Other operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(68.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,979.2 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
1,807.5 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
1,541.8 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
607.1 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
$ |
587.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
634.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004 Consolidated Results |
Net Sales Consolidated net sales increased
approximately 4.7% to $10.51 billion during 2005 from
$10.04 billion in 2004. Net sales by segment are shown in
the table below.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net Sales | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
$ Increase | |
|
% Increase | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
|
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
8,961.5 |
|
|
$ |
8,665.4 |
|
|
$ |
296.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
1,144.3 |
|
|
|
1,010.3 |
|
|
|
134.0 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
399.8 |
|
|
|
360.6 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
10,505.6 |
|
|
$ |
10,036.3 |
|
|
$ |
469.3 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
The change in net sales was due to the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Change in Net Sales 2005 vs. 2004 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Pricing, Volume | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
and Product | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Exchange | |
|
Mix Changes | |
|
Increase | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In millions) | |
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
260.7 |
|
|
$ |
296.1 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.8 |
|
|
|
134.0 |
|
|
Corporate/Other
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
59.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
410.1 |
|
|
$ |
469.3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased approximately $469.3 million during
2005 compared to the prior year primarily due to strong volume
growth and increased pricing in the Dairy Group and WhiteWave
Foods Company segments. Net sales in Corporate/ Other increased
approximately $39.2 million primarily due to sales volume
growth at Rachels Organic and Leche Celtas
acquisition of Tiger Foods in the second quarter of 2004.
Cost of Sales All expenses incurred to bring
a product to completion are included in cost of sales, such as
raw material, ingredient and packaging costs; labor costs; and
plant and equipment costs, including costs to operate and
maintain our coolers and freezers. In addition, our Dairy Group
includes costs associated with transporting our finished
products from our manufacturing facilities to our own
distribution facilities. Cost of goods sold increased by
approximately 3.6% to $7.92 billion in 2005 from
$7.64 billion in 2004 primarily due to increased volumes
and increased resin and other commodity costs, partly offset by
lower raw milk costs in our Dairy Group. Our cost of sales ratio
decreased to 75.4% in 2005 compared to 76.1% in 2004 primarily
due to the impact of higher volumes and efficiencies gained
through our facility rationalization activities.
Operating Costs and Expenses Our operating
expenses increased approximately $171.7 million, or
approximately 9.5%, during 2005 versus the prior year. Operating
expenses increased primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
Distribution costs increased approximately $91.2 million
due to higher fuel costs and increased volumes at our Dairy
Group and WhiteWave Foods Company segments; |
| |
| |
|
Corporate expenses were approximately $32.0 million higher
than last year, primarily due to: (1) increased employee
compensation costs of approximately $17 million including
charges related to the accelerated vesting of certain stock
units and increased incentive compensation due to improved
performance; (2) higher professional fees of approximately
$11 million primarily related to the reorganization of our
WhiteWave Foods Company; and (3) $3.1 million of
severance expense for the former President of WhiteWave Foods
Company. |
| |
| |
|
Net facility closing and reorganization costs that were
approximately $14.0 million higher than 2004. See
Facility Closing and Reorganization Activities. |
| |
| |
|
Other operating income declined by approximately
$5.9 million in 2005 compared to the prior year due to a
gain recorded in 2004 related to the settlement of litigation. |
Our operating expense ratio increased to 18.8% for 2005 as
compared to 18.0% for 2004.
Operating Income Operating income was
$607.1 million in 2005, an increase of $19.7 million
from 2004 operating income of $587.4 million. Our operating
margin was 5.8% in 2005 compared to 5.9% in 2004.
Other (Income) Expense Interest expense
decreased to $169 million in 2005 from $198.9 million
in 2004, primarily due to a charge of $32.6 million in 2004
to write-off deferred financing costs related to our senior
credit facility amended in August 2004.
Income Taxes Income tax expense was recorded
at an effective rate of 37.9% in 2005 compared to 38.5% in 2004.
Our effective tax rate varies based on the relative earnings of
our business units. In 2005, our income tax rate was positively
impacted by the change in expected realization of net operating
loss
27
carryforwards and a favorable tax settlement. In 2004, our tax
rate was negatively impacted by the write-off of deferred
financing costs that were incurred in a business unit with a
lower relative effective tax rate.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004 Results by Segment |
Dairy Group
The key performance indicators of our Dairy Group segment are
sales volumes, gross profit and operating income.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,961.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,665.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6,843.7 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
6,668.7 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,117.8 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
1,996.7 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,477.9 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
1,400.4 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
639.9 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
$ |
596.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Dairy Groups net sales increased approximately
$296.1 million, or 3.4%, in 2005 versus 2004. The change in
net sales from 2004 to 2005 was due to the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
2004 Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,665.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Acquisitions
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
| |
Volume
|
|
|
163.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
| |
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,961.5 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the Dairy Groups sales was driven
primarily by increased volumes. Volume sales of all Dairy Group
products, excluding the impact of acquisitions, increased 1.9%
in 2005 compared to 2004. Volume sales of fresh milk, which were
approximately 69% of the Dairy Groups 2005 volumes, were
up approximately 2.5% for the year compared to USDA data showing
a relatively flat total consumption of milk in the
U.S. during the year.
The increase in the Dairy Groups net sales due to pricing
and product mix shown in the above table primarily resulted from
increased pricing due to the pass through of increased fuel and
packaging costs, partly offset by lower raw milk costs in 2005.
In general, our Dairy Group changes the prices it charges
customers for fluid dairy products on a monthly basis, as the
costs of raw materials and other variable costs fluctuate.
Because of competitive pressures, the price increases do not
always reflect the entire increase in raw material and other
input costs that we may experience. The following table sets
forth the average monthly Class I mover and
average monthly Class II minimum prices for raw skim milk
and butterfat for 2005 compared to 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31* | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
% Change | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class I raw skim milk
mover(1)
|
|
$ |
8.54 |
(2) |
|
$ |
8.44 |
(2) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Class I butterfat
mover(1)
|
|
|
1.76 |
(3) |
|
|
1.95 |
(3) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
Class II raw skim milk
minimum(4)
|
|
|
7.74 |
(2) |
|
|
6.90 |
(2) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Class II butterfat
minimum(4)
|
|
|
1.72 |
(3) |
|
|
2.06 |
(3) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
28
|
|
|
| |
* |
The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we
actually pay. The minimum prices applicable at any given
location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I
butterfat are based on the Class I mover plus a location
differential. Class II prices noted in the table are
federal minimum prices, applicable at all locations. Our actual
cost also includes producer premiums, procurement costs and
other related charges that vary by location and vendor. Please
see Part I Item 1.
Business Government Regulation Milk
Industry Regulation and Known Trends and
Uncertainties Prices of Materials and Other
Inputs for a more complete description of raw milk pricing. |
|
|
| (1) |
We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid
milk products. |
| |
| (2) |
Prices are per hundredweight. |
| |
| (3) |
Prices are per pound. |
| |
| (4) |
We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into
products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream
and sour cream. |
The Dairy Group acquired Milk Products of Alabama in October
2004, which we estimate contributed an additional
$35.4 million in sales during 2005.
The Dairy Groups cost of sales increased to
$6.84 billion in 2005 compared to $6.67 billion in
2004 primarily due to increased volumes and an approximately
$43 million increase in resin costs, partly offset by lower
raw milk costs. Resin prices increased primarily due to
significant supply constraints resulting from the Gulf Coast
hurricanes. Resin is the primary raw material in our plastic
bottles. The Dairy Groups cost of sales ratio decreased to
76.4% in 2005 compared to 77.0% in 2005 primarily due to the
impact of higher volumes and efficiencies gained through our
facility rationalization activities.
The Dairy Groups operating expenses increased
approximately $77.5 million during 2005 compared to 2004
primarily due to (1) higher distribution costs of
$60.7 million, $31 million of which was due to
increased fuel prices and the remaining increase was driven by
increased volumes; (2) higher incentive compensation costs
of approximately $12 million due to improved operating
results and (3) higher bad debt expense. Bad debt expense
increased approximately $9 million in 2005 compared to the
prior year due to the impact of Hurricane Katrina, the write-off
of a receivable from a large customer, as well as the relatively
higher level of bad debt recoveries recognized in 2004. The
Dairy Groups operating expense ratio increased to 16.5% in
2005 from 16.1% in 2004.
WhiteWave Foods Company
The key performance indicators of WhiteWave Foods Company are
net sales dollars, gross profit and operating income.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,144.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,010.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
734.5 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
660.3 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
409.8 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
294.9 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
262.6 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
114.9 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
87.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
WhiteWave Foods Companys net sales increased by
approximately $134 million, or 13.3%, in 2005 versus 2004.
The change in net sales from 2004 to 2005 was due to the
following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
2004 Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,010.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Acquisitions
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
| |
Volume
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
| |
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,144.3 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double digit volume growth in our Silk and Horizon
Organic brands, combined with somewhat slower growth in
International Delight and LAND OLAKES, was
partly offset by elimination of certain product offerings. We
believe increased Silk and Horizon Organic volumes
were due primarily to increased consumer acceptance and
increased marketing efforts. We are in the process of
eliminating certain products and brands from our portfolio of
products, which negatively impacted our sales growth in 2005. If
we excluded the discontinued products from 2004 and 2005
results, our sales would have increased approximately 15% in
2005 over the prior year.
Higher pricing also contributed to the increase in sales. The
two primary drivers of this increase were (1) increased
selling prices in response to increased commodity costs, and
(2) a decline in slotting fees, couponing and certain other
promotional costs that are required to be recorded as reductions
of net sales. We also benefited from the 2004 acquisition of the
LAND OLAKES cream, sour cream, and whipping cream
business in the Eastern part of the U.S. which we estimate added
$9.2 million to our sales growth.
Cost of sales for WhiteWave Foods Company increased to
$734.5 million in 2005 from $660.3 million in 2004
primarily due to increased volumes and the impact of higher raw
material costs, particularly organic raw milk and organic
soybeans, which increased cost of sales by approximately
$26 million. The cost of sales ratio declined to 64.2% in
2005 from 65.4% in 2004 due to the impact of supply chain
changes and product rationalization in 2005.
Operating expenses increased approximately $32.3 million in
2005 compared to the prior year primarily due to increased
volumes and higher fuel costs which together contributed
approximately $22 million to distribution expenses.
Compensation expense also increased as a result of increased
staffing levels to support the growth of our organization.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003 Consolidated Results |
Net Sales Consolidated net sales increased
approximately 19.6% to $10.04 billion during 2004 from
$8.39 billion in 2003. Net sales by segment are shown in
the table below.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net Sales | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
$ Increase/ | |
|
% Increase/ | |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
(Decrease) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
8,665.4 |
|
|
$ |
7,547.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,118.2 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
1,010.3 |
|
|
|
598.9 |
|
|
|
411.4 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
360.6 |
|
|
|
244.9 |
|
|
|
115.7 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
10,036.3 |
|
|
$ |
8,391.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,645.3 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
The change in net sales was due to the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Change in Net Sales 2004 vs. 2003 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Pricing, Volume | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
and Product | |
|
Increase/ | |
| |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Divestitures | |
|
Exchange | |
|
Mix Changes | |
|
(Decrease) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In millions) | |
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
386.2 |
|
|
$ |
(26.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
758.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,118.2 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
232.9 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182.5 |
|
|
|
411.4 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
67.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
115.7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
687.0 |
|
|
$ |
(30.2 |
) |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
960.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,645.3 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased approximately $1.65 billion during 2004
compared to the prior year primarily due to higher selling
prices resulting from the pass-through of increased raw milk
costs and due to acquisitions. We acquired Kohler Mix
Specialties, Melody Farms and Ross Swiss Dairies in our Dairy
Group segment; Horizon Organic and LAND OLAKES East
in our WhiteWave Foods Company segment and Tiger Foods in our
Corporate/ Other segment.
Cost of Sales All expenses incurred to bring
a product to completion are included in cost of sales, such as
raw material, ingredient and packaging costs; labor costs; and
plant and equipment costs, including costs to operate and
maintain our coolers and freezers. In addition, our Dairy Group
includes costs associated with transporting our finished
products from our manufacturing facilities to our own
distribution facilities. Our cost of sales ratio increased to
76.1% in 2004 compared to 74.1% in 2003 due almost entirely to
increased raw material costs that affected both of our segments
in 2004.
Operating Costs and Expenses Our operating
expenses increased approximately $265.7 million, or
approximately 17.2%, during 2004 versus the prior year.
Operating expenses increased primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
| |
|
Acquisitions, which we estimate represented approximately
$118 million of the increase. |
| |
| |
|
A $62.8 million decline in other operating income compared
to 2003 primarily due to a $66.2 million gain on the sale
of our frozen pre-whipped topping business that reduced
operating expenses in 2003. |
| |
| |
|
Higher fuel costs in both segments and increased volumes at the
WhiteWave Foods Company, which we estimate added a combined
total of approximately $25 million to distribution costs
for 2004 as compared to 2003. |
| |
| |
|
Net facility closing and reorganization costs that were
approximately $12.8 million higher than in 2003. |
| |
| |
|
Corporate expenses that were approximately $10 million
higher than the prior year, including higher professional fees
and legal fees primarily related to the reorganization of
WhiteWave Foods Company, increased transactional activity and
higher regulatory compliance fees. |
Our operating expense ratio decreased slightly to 18.0% for 2004
compared to 18.3% for 2003.
Operating Income Operating income during 2004
was $587.4 million, a decrease of $47 million from
2003 operating income of $634.4 million. This decrease was
primarily due to the $66.2 million gain on the sale of our
frozen pre-whipped topping business in 2003. Our operating
margin in 2004 was 5.9% compared to 7.6% in 2003. Our operating
margin decreased primarily as a result of higher raw material
costs and the effect of increased sales.
Other (Income) Expense Total other (income)
expense increased by $13.2 million in 2004 compared to
2003. Interest expense increased to $198.9 million in 2004
from $173.9 million in 2003, primarily due to a charge of
$32.6 million in 2004 to write-off deferred financing costs
related to our senior credit facility amended in August 2004.
This charge was partially offset by lower interest expense due
to lower interest rates during 2004. There were no financing
charges on preferred securities in 2004 as compared to
$14.2 million in
31
2003. Our convertible preferred securities were converted into
common stock in the second quarter of 2003. See Note 10 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes Income tax expense was recorded
at an effective rate of 38.5% in 2004 compared to 38.6% in 2003.
Our effective tax rate varies based on the relative earnings of
our business units.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003 Results by Segment |
Dairy Group
The key performance indicators of our Dairy Group segment are
sales volumes, gross profit and operating income.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,665.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,547.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6,668.7 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
5,622.9 |
|
|
|
74.5 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,996.7 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
1,924.3 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,400.4 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
1,284.1 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
596.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
$ |
640.2 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Dairy Groups net sales increased by approximately
$1.12 billion, or 14.8%, in 2004 versus 2003. The change in
net sales from 2003 to 2004 was due to the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
7,547.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Acquisitions
|
|
|
386.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
| |
Divestitures
|
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
| |
Volume
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
| |
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
747.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,665.4 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Dairy Groups net sales increased primarily due to
pricing and product mix resulting from increased pricing due to
the pass through of higher raw milk costs in 2004. In general,
our Dairy Group changes the prices it charges customers for
fluid dairy products on a monthly basis, as the costs of raw
materials and other variable input costs fluctuate. Because of
competitive pressures, the price increase may not reflect the
entire increase in raw material or other variable costs that we
experience. The following table sets forth the average monthly
Class I mover and average monthly Class II
minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for 2004 compared
to 2003:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31* | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
% Change | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Class I raw skim milk
mover(3)
|
|
$ |
8.44 |
(1) |
|
$ |
7.47 |
(1) |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
Class I butterfat
mover(3)
|
|
|
1.95 |
(2) |
|
|
1.19 |
(2) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
Class II raw skim milk
minimum(4)
|
|
|
6.90 |
(1) |
|
|
6.74 |
(1) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Class II butterfat
minimum(4)
|
|
|
2.06 |
(2) |
|
|
1.22 |
(2) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
| |
* |
The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we
actually pay. The federal order minimum prices at any given
location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I
butterfat are based on the Class I mover plus a location
differential. Class II prices noted in the table are
federal minimum prices, applicable at all locations. Our actual
cost also includes producer premiums, procurement costs and
other related charges |
32
|
|
|
| |
|
that vary by location and vendor. Please see
Part I Item 1. Business
Government Regulation Milk Industry Regulation
and Known Trends and Uncertainties
Prices of Raw Materials and Other Inputs for a more
complete description of raw milk pricing. |
|
|
| (1) |
Prices are per hundredweight. |
| |
| (2) |
Prices are per pound. |
| |
| (3) |
We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid
milk products. |
| |
| (4) |
We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into
products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream
and sour cream. |
The other primary cause of the increase in the Dairy
Groups net sales was acquisitions. The Dairy Group
acquired Milk Products of Alabama in October 2004, Ross Swiss
Dairies in January 2004, Kohler Mix Specialties in October 2003
and Melody Farms in June 2003, which we estimate contributed a
combined total of $386.2 million in sales during 2004.
These increases were slightly offset by the divestiture in July
2003 of the frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen creamer
operations.
Volume sales of all Dairy Group products increased 0.1% in 2004
compared to 2003. Volume sales of milk and cream, which were
approximately 71% of the Dairy Groups 2004 sales, were up
approximately 1.2% for the year compared to USDA data showing a
0.8% decline in total consumption of milk and cream in the
U.S. during the year.
The Dairy Groups cost of sales ratio was higher in 2004 at
77% compared to 74.5% for 2003 primarily due to the increase in
raw milk costs compared to the prior year. The average minimum
price of Class I raw skim milk (as indicated by the
Class I mover, described above) was 13% higher and the
average Class I butterfat mover increased 64% in 2004 as
compared to 2003. Our costs were also impacted by resin prices
as they continued to rise. Higher resin prices impacted the cost
of our plastic bottles by approximately $17 million. Due to
a very competitive retail environment in 2004, we were unable to
pass along the entire increase in raw material and other
variable input costs to our customers.
The Dairy Groups operating expenses increased
approximately $116.3 million during 2004 compared to 2003
primarily due to (1) acquisitions, which we estimate
contributed approximately $61 million in operating costs;
(2) higher fuel costs of which approximately
$14 million was related to an increase in fuel prices and
(3) an increase in insurance expense due to our claims
experience. The increase in sales volumes also contributed to
our higher operating expenses. These increases were partly
offset by a decrease in bad debt expense, primarily due to more
favorable than expected resolution of previously accrued bad
debt reserves. These bad debt reserves were recorded for certain
customers that experienced economic difficulty and a few large
customers that sought bankruptcy protection over the past
several years. The Dairy Groups operating expense ratio
decreased to 16.1% in 2004 from 17.0% in 2003 due to the effect
of increased sales.
WhiteWave Foods Company
The key performance indicators of WhiteWave Foods Company are
net sales dollars, gross profit and operating income.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,010.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
598.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
660.3 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
386.3 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
212.6 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
262.6 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
209.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
87.4 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
WhiteWave Foods Companys net sales increased by
$411.4 million, or 68.7%, in 2004 versus 2003. The change
in net sales from 2003 to 2004 was due to the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
|
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
598.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Acquisitions
|
|
|
232.9 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
% |
| |
Divestitures
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
| |
Volume
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
| |
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,010.3 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most significant cause of the increase in WhiteWave Foods
Companys sales was the acquisition of Horizon Organic
effective January 1, 2004, and to a lesser extent the
acquisition of the LAND OLAKES cream, sour cream
and whipping cream business in the Eastern part of the U.S.
effective March 31, 2004.
Another significant cause of the increase in sales was increased
volumes. Volume sales for WhiteWave Foods Company increased
approximately 16.1% in 2004 due to the success of our brands,
particularly Silk and International Delight. We
believe increased Silk volumes were due primarily to:
(1) increased consumer acceptance of soy products,
resulting in increased penetration of soymilk in the club, mass
merchandiser and grocery channels; (2) the positive effects
of our consumer advertising; and (3) the introduction of
new Silk products with nutritional enhancements, new
flavors and larger size offerings. We believe the increase in
International Delight volumes is due primarily to
consumer acceptance of new packaging introduced in 2003 and new
low-carb flavors introduced in 2004.
Higher pricing also contributed to the increase in sales. The
two primary drivers of this increase were (1) increased
selling prices in response to increased commodity costs and
(2) a decline in slotting fees, couponing and certain other
promotional costs that are required to be recorded as reductions
of net sales, as we shift our focus toward consumer-oriented
advertising and marketing, which are recorded as operating
expense.
These increases were offset slightly by the divestiture in July
2003 of the branded frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen
creamer operations.
Cost of goods sold for WhiteWave Foods Company increased to
$660.3 million in 2004 from $386.3 million in 2003
primarily due to the impact of higher raw material costs,
particularly Class II butterfat and organic soybeans, and
the addition of Horizon Organic. The average minimum price of
Class II butterfat was 69% higher in 2004 than in 2003. Our
average cost of organic soybeans was approximately 40% higher in
2004 than in 2003 primarily due to an increase in domestic
organic soybean prices and the utilization of foreign grown
organic soybeans, which have a higher price than domestic beans.
The cost of sales ratio increased slightly to 65.4% in 2004 from
64.5% in 2003 primarily due to the effect of increased sales.
Operating expenses increased approximately $52.9 million in
2004 compared to the prior year primarily due to acquisitions,
which we estimate contributed approximately $47 million in
costs, and increased volumes and higher fuel costs which
together contributed approximately $11.5 million to
distribution expenses. Marketing spending increased
approximately 6% in 2004 as compared to 2003. These increases
were somewhat offset by a decline of approximately
$16.1 million related to the expiration of the White Wave
management incentive plan in March 2004. The operating expense
ratio decreased to 25.9% during 2004 from 35.0% during the prior
year primarily due to the relatively smaller increase in
operating expense dollars compared to the increase in sales
dollars.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During 2005, we met our working capital needs with cash flow
from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities from
continuing operations was $541.0 million for 2005 as
compared to $420.7 million for
34
2004, an increase of $120.3 million. Net cash provided by
operating activities from continuing operations was impacted by
a decrease in our working capital of $15 million in 2005
compared to an increase of $211.7 million in 2004 due
primarily to lower raw milk costs in 2005. In addition, income
taxes payable decreased $37.1 million in 2005 compared to a
decrease of $10.0 million in 2004 due to the timing of tax
payments.
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations
was $109.8 million in 2005 compared to $723.2 million
in 2004, a decrease of $613.4 million. We used
approximately $1.8 million for acquisitions and
$306.8 million for capital expenditures in 2005 compared to
$400.0 million and $333.8 million in 2004,
respectively. We received cash proceeds from the sale of
operations of $189.9 million in 2005.
We used approximately $699.9 million to repurchase our
stock during 2005. Set forth in the chart below is a summary of
the stock we repurchased in 2005:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
No. of Shares of | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
Average | |
| |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Purchase | |
|
Purchase Price | |
| Period |
|
Repurchased | |
|
Price(1) | |
|
Per Share | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions except | |
| |
|
|
|
per share data) | |
|
July 2005
|
|
|
1,907,100 |
|
|
$ |
68.9 |
|
|
$ |
36.11 |
|
|
August 2005
|
|
|
3,927,600 |
|
|
|
140.6 |
|
|
|
35.80 |
|
|
September 2005
|
|
|
4,091,300 |
|
|
|
151.8 |
|
|
|
37.10 |
|
|
October 2005
|
|
|
1,422,500 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
37.95 |
|
|
November 2005
|
|
|
5,995,400 |
|
|
|
224.6 |
|
|
|
37.46 |
|
|
December 2005
|
|
|
1,537,400 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
39.04 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
18,881,300 |
|
|
$ |
699.9 |
|
|
|
37.07 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Includes commissions and fees. |
We received approximately $73.1 million in 2005 as a result
of stock option exercises and employee stock purchases through
our employee stock purchase plan.
We increased our net borrowings by $175.7 million in 2005
compared to a net borrowing of $441.9 million in 2004.
Senior Credit Facility Our senior credit
facility provides for a $1.5 billion revolving credit
facility and a $1.5 billion term loan. In May 2005, we
amended our senior credit facility to lower the interest rate on
the revolving credit facility and term loan. With the amendment,
both the revolving credit facility and term loan bear interest,
at our election, at the base rate plus a margin that varies from
0 to 25 basis points depending on our credit ratings (as
issued by Standard & Poors and Moodys), or
LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 50 to 150 basis
points, depending on our credit ratings (as issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys). The blended
interest rate in effect on borrowings under the senior credit
facility, including the applicable interest rate margin, was
5.16% at December 31, 2005. However, we had interest rate
swap agreements in place that hedged $1.625 billion of our
borrowings under the senior credit facility at an average rate
of 4.5%, plus the applicable interest rate margin. Interest is
payable quarterly or at the end of the applicable interest
period.
Principal payments are required on the term loan as follows:
|
|
|
| |
|
$56.25 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2006 through September 30, 2008; |
| |
| |
|
$262.5 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2008 through June 30, 2009; and |
| |
| |
|
A final payment of $262.5 million on the maturity date of
August 13, 2009. |
No principal payments are due on the $1.5 billion revolving
credit facility until maturity on August 13, 2009.
35
The credit agreement also requires mandatory principal
prepayments upon the occurrence of certain asset dispositions or
recovery events.
In consideration for the revolving commitment, we pay a
quarterly commitment fee on unused amounts of the revolving
credit facility that ranges from 12.5 to 30 basis points,
depending on our credit ratings (as issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys).
The senior credit facility contains various financial and other
restrictive covenants and requires that we maintain certain
financial ratios, including a leverage ratio and an interest
coverage ratio. On November 18, 2005, we amended our senior
credit facility to change the maximum leverage covenant to 4.35
to 1.00 through March 31, 2007 and 4.00 to 1.00 thereafter.
We are currently in compliance with all covenants contained in
our credit agreement.
Our credit agreement permits us to complete acquisitions that
meet the following conditions without obtaining prior approval:
(1) the acquired company is involved in the manufacture,
processing and distribution of food or packaging products or any
other line of business in which we are currently engaged,
(2) the net cash purchase price is not greater than
$500 million, (3) we acquire at least 51% of the
acquired entity, (4) the transaction is approved by the
Board of Directors or shareholders, as appropriate, of the
target and (5) after giving effect to such acquisition on a
pro-forma basis, we are in compliance with all financial
covenants. All other acquisitions must be approved in advance by
the required lenders.
The senior credit facility also contains limitations on liens,
investments and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and
prohibits certain dispositions of property and restricts certain
payments, including dividends. The senior credit facility is
secured by liens on substantially all of our domestic assets
including the assets of our subsidiaries, but excluding the
capital stock of Legacy Deans subsidiaries, and the real
property owned by Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries.
The credit agreement contains standard default triggers,
including without limitation: failure to maintain compliance
with the financial and other covenants contained in the credit
agreement, default on certain of our other debt, certain other
material adverse changes in our business, and a change in
control. The credit agreement does not contain any default
triggers based on our credit rating.
At December 31, 2005, we had outstanding borrowings of
$2.26 billion under our senior credit facility (compared to
$2.03 billion at December 31, 2004), including
$1.5 billion in term loan borrowings and
$758.6 million outstanding under the revolving line of
credit. At December 31, 2005, there were
$112.1 million of letters of credit under the revolving
line that were issued but undrawn. As of March 6, 2006,
approximately $568.1 million was outstanding under our
senior credit facility.
In addition to our senior credit facility, we also have a
$600 million receivables-backed credit facility, which had
$548.4 million outstanding at December 31, 2005
(compared to $500 million at December 31, 2004). The
receivables-backed facility was fully funded at
December 31, 2005. The average interest rate on this
facility at December 31, 2005 was 4.6%. Approximately
$516.1 million was outstanding under this facility at
March 6, 2006. See Note 9 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information about our
receivables-backed facility.
Our outstanding borrowings under the senior credit facility and
receivables-backed credit facility increased from 2004 to 2005
primarily to fund our share repurchases.
Other indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2005 also
included $600 million face value of outstanding
indebtedness under Legacy Deans senior notes, a
$40.9 million line of credit at our Spanish subsidiary and
approximately $20.5 million face value of capital lease and
other obligations. See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
36
The table below summarizes our obligations for indebtedness,
purchase and lease obligations at December 31, 2005. Please
see Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more detail about our lease and purchase obligations.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Payments Due by Period | |
| Indebtedness, Purchase & |
|
| |
| Lease Obligations |
|
Total | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 | |
|
Thereafter | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In millions) | |
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
$ |
2,258.6 |
|
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
225.0 |
|
|
$ |
431.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,546.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Senior notes(1)
|
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
Receivables-backed credit facility
|
|
|
548.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign line of credit
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations and other(1)
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Purchasing obligations(2)
|
|
|
524.6 |
|
|
|
241.2 |
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
459.6 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
85.1 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
|
89.1 |
|
|
Interest payments(3)
|
|
|
644.4 |
|
|
|
186.3 |
|
|
|
171.7 |
|
|
|
144.4 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
70.7 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
5,097.0 |
|
|
$ |
633.5 |
|
|
$ |
858.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,242.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,893.9 |
|
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
$ |
392.9 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Represents face value. |
| |
| (2) |
Primarily represents commitments to purchase minimum quantities
of raw materials used in our production processes, including
organic soybeans and organic raw milk. We enter into these
contracts from time to time to ensure a sufficient supply of raw
ingredients. In addition, we have contractual obligations to
purchase various services that are part of our production
process. |
| |
| (3) |
Includes fixed rate interest obligations as well as interest on
our variable rate debt based on the rates and balances in effect
at December 31, 2005. Interest that may be due in the
future on the variable rate portion of our senior credit
facility will vary based on the interest rate in effect at the
time and the borrowings outstanding at the time. |
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
We offer pension benefits through various defined benefit
pension plans and also offer certain health care and life
insurance benefits to eligible employees and their eligible
dependents upon the retirement of such employees. Reported costs
of providing non-contributory defined pension benefits and other
postretirement benefits are dependent upon numerous factors,
assumptions and estimates.
For example, these costs are impacted by actual employee
demographics (including age, compensation levels and employment
periods), the level of contributions made to the plan and
earnings on plan assets. Our pension plan assets are primarily
made up of equity and fixed income investments. Changes made to
the provisions of the plan also may impact current and future
pension costs. Fluctuations in actual equity market returns as
well as changes in general interest rates may result in
increased or decreased pension costs in future periods. Pension
and postretirement costs also may be significantly affected by
changes in key actuarial assumptions, including anticipated
rates of return on plan assets and the discount rates used in
determining the benefit obligation and annual periodic pension
costs.
In accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement
Benefits, changes in obligations associated with these
factors may not be immediately recognized as pension costs on
the income statement, but generally are recognized in future
years over the remaining average service period of plan
participants. As such, significant portions of pension costs
recorded in any period may not reflect the actual level of cash
benefits provided to plan participants. In 2005, we recorded
non-cash pension expense of $11.5 million, of which
$8.0 million was attributable to periodic expense and
$3.5 million was attributable to settlements compared to a
total of $9.8 million in 2004, of which $1.8 million
was attributable to settlements. These amounts were determined
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 87,
SFAS No. 106 and SFAS No. 88,
Employers Accounting for Settlements and
Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for
Termination Benefits.
37
The assumed discount rate was 5.75% at December 31, 2004
and 2005. In order to select a discount rate for purposes of
valuing the plan obligations and fiscal year-end disclosure, an
analysis is performed in which the duration of projected cash
flows from defined benefit and retiree health care plans are
matched with a yield curve based on an appropriate universe of
high-quality corporate bonds that are available. We use the
results of the yield curve analysis to select the discount rate
that matches the duration and payment stream of the benefits in
each plan. Each rate is rounded to the nearest quarter of a
percent. In selecting the assumed rate of return on plan assets,
we consider past performance and economic forecasts for the
types of investments held by the plan, as well as our investment
allocation policy and the effect of periodic target asset
allocation rebalancing. We rebalance the investments when the
allocation is not within the target range. The results are
adjusted for the payment of reasonable expenses of the plan from
plan assets. We believe these assumptions are appropriate based
upon the mix of investments and the long-term nature of the
plans investments. Plan asset returns were
$14.1 million in 2005, a $2.9 million increase from
plan asset returns of $11.2 million in 2004. Net periodic
pension expense for our plans is expected to decrease in 2006 to
approximately $9.5 million due primarily to the increase in
assets from $165.3 million as of December 31, 2004 to
$190.6 million as of December 31, 2005. Based on
current projections, 2006 funding requirements will be
approximately $25.8 million as compared to
$34.1 million for 2005. The postretirement benefit plans
are not funded. Based on current projections, 2006 cash
requirements to pay benefits for our other postretirement
benefit obligations will remain at approximately
$2.6 million, the same as the 2005 cash requirements.
We were required to recognize an additional minimum liability
for certain pension plans as prescribed by SFAS No. 87
and SFAS No. 132, Employers Disclosures
about Pensions and Postretirement Benefits. The
accumulated other comprehensive income component of the
additional minimum liability, which totaled $18.5 million
($11.8 million net of tax), was recorded as a reduction to
stockholders equity through a charge to Other
Comprehensive Income, and did not affect net income for 2005.
The charge to Other Comprehensive Income will be reversed in
future periods to the extent the fair value of plan assets
exceeds the accumulated benefit obligation. See Notes 13
and 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for information
regarding retirement plans and other postretirement benefits.
|
|
|
Other Commitments and Contingencies |
On December 21, 2001, in connection with our acquisition of
Legacy Dean, we issued a contingent, subordinated promissory
note to Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) in the
original principal amount of $40 million. DFA is our
primary supplier of raw milk, and the promissory note is
designed to ensure that DFA has the opportunity to continue to
supply raw milk to certain of our facilities until 2021, or be
paid for the loss of that business. The promissory note has a
20-year term and bears
interest based on the consumer price index. Interest will not be
paid in cash, but will be added to the principal amount of the
note annually, up to a maximum principal amount of
$96 million. We may prepay the note in whole or in part at
any time, without penalty. The note will only become payable if
we ever materially breach or terminate one of our milk supply
agreements with DFA without renewal or replacement. Otherwise,
the note will expire at the end of 20 years, without any
obligation to pay any portion of the principal or interest.
Payments we make under this note, if any, will be expensed as
incurred.
We also have the following commitments and contingent
liabilities, in addition to contingent liabilities related to
ordinary course litigation, investigations and audits:
|
|
|
| |
|
certain indemnification obligations related to businesses that
we have divested; |
| |
| |
|
certain lease obligations, which require us to guarantee the
minimum value of the leased asset at the end of the
lease; and |
| |
| |
|
selected levels of property and casualty risks, primarily
related to employee health care, workers compensation
claims and other casualty losses. |
38
See Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information about our commitments and contingent
obligations.
|
|
|
Future Capital Requirements |
During 2006, we intend to invest a total of approximately
$260 million in capital expenditures primarily for our
existing manufacturing facilities and distribution capabilities.
The lower amount from the prior year reflects the completion of
several major capital projects in 2005. We intend to fund these
expenditures using cash flow from operations. We intend to spend
this amount as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Operating Division |
|
Amount | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In millions) | |
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
| |
|
|
|
In 2006, we expect cash interest to be approximately
$195 million based on current debt levels and cash taxes to
be approximately $120 million. We expect that cash flow
from operations will be sufficient to meet our requirements for
our existing businesses for the foreseeable future. As of
March 6, 2006, approximately $568.1 million was
available for future borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Known Trends and Uncertainties
|
|
|
Prices of Raw Materials and Other Inputs |
Dairy Group The primary raw material used in
our Dairy Group is raw milk (which contains both raw skim milk
and butterfat). The federal government and certain state
governments set minimum prices for raw milk, and those prices
change on a monthly basis. The regulated minimum prices differ
based on how the raw milk is utilized. Raw milk processed into
fluid milk is priced at the Class I price, and raw milk
processed into products such as cottage cheese, creams and
creamers, ice cream and sour cream is priced at the
Class II price. Generally, we pay the federal minimum
prices for raw milk, plus certain producer premiums (or
over-order premiums) and location differentials. We
also incur other raw milk procurement costs in some locations
(such as hauling, field personnel, etc.). A change in the
federal minimum price does not necessarily mean an identical
change in our total raw milk costs, as over-order premiums may
increase or decrease. This relationship is different in every
region of the country, and sometimes within a region based on
supplier arrangements. However, in general, the overall change
in our raw milk costs can be linked to the change in federal
minimum prices. Because our Class II products typically
have a higher fat content than that contained in raw milk, we
also purchase bulk cream for use in some of our Class II
products. Bulk cream is typically purchased based on a multiple
of the AA butter price on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
Another significant raw material used by our Dairy Group is
resin, which is used to make plastic bottles. Resin is a
petroleum-based product and the price of resin generally has
increased recently due to increases in crude oil prices. Our
Dairy Group purchases approximately four million gallons of
diesel fuel per month to operate our extensive direct store
delivery system. In general, our Dairy Group changes the prices
that it charges for Class I dairy products on a monthly
basis, as the costs of raw milk, packaging, fuel and other
materials fluctuate. Prices for some Class II products are
also changed monthly while others are changed from time to time
as circumstances warrant. However, there can be a lag between
the time of a raw material cost increase or decrease and the
effectiveness of a corresponding price change to our customers,
especially in the case of Class II butterfat because
Class II butterfat prices for each month are not announced
by the government until after the end of that month. Also, in
some cases we are competitively or contractually constrained
with the means and timing of implementing price changes. These
factors can cause volatility in our earnings. Our sales and
operating profit margin fluctuate with the price of our raw
materials and other inputs.
39
In 2004, our Dairy Group was adversely affected by extreme
volatility in the prices of raw skim milk, butterfat and cream.
In 2005, prices for raw skim milk, butterfat and cream were more
stable than in 2004 but remained high. We expect raw milk,
butterfat and cream prices to decrease slightly over the first
two quarters of 2006. However, raw milk, butterfat and cream
prices are difficult to predict and we change our forecasts
frequently based on current market activity.
Due to the disruption in production caused by Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita, the prices of resin and fuel have increased
dramatically and resin supplies have from time to time been
insufficient to meet demand. We are undertaking all reasonable
measures in an attempt to secure an adequate resin supply;
however, there can be no assurance that we will always be
successful in our attempts. We expect prices of both resin and
diesel fuel to remain high throughout 2006.
WhiteWave Foods Company A significant raw
material used to manufacture products sold by WhiteWave Foods
Company is organic soybeans. We have entered into supply
agreements for organic soybeans, which we believe will meet our
needs for 2006. Generally, these agreements provide for pricing
at fixed levels. However, should our need for organic soybeans
exceed the quantity that we have under contract, or if the
suppliers do not perform under the contracts, we may have
difficulty obtaining sufficient supply, and the price we would
be required to pay likely would be significantly higher. The
increase in soymilk consumption combined with the increased
demand for organic soybeans in cattle feed has put pressure on
the supply of organic soybeans and there is a risk of
significant upward pressure on organic soybean prices.
Another significant raw material used in our organic products is
organic raw milk. Organic raw milk is not readily available and
the growth of our organic dairy business depends on us being
able to procure sufficient quantities of organic raw milk in
time to meet our needs. We obtain our supply of organic raw milk
by entering into one to two year agreements with farmers
pursuant to which the farmers agree to sell us specified
quantities of organic raw milk for fixed prices for the duration
of the agreement. The industry-wide demand for organic raw milk
has exceeded supply, resulting in our inability to fully meet
customer demand. As a result at times we are forced to limit
quantities we ship to our customers. We expect to continue to
limit quantities available to customers of organic milk into the
second quarter of 2006. Also, as our contracts with farmers
expire, we are generally required to agree to higher prices to
renew as a result of increased competition for organic raw milk
supply. The increase in the demand for organic milk combined
with competitive activity and a limited supply has put
significant upward pressure on organic raw milk costs.
There has been significant consolidation in the retail grocery
industry in recent years, and this trend is continuing. As our
customer base consolidates, we expect competition to intensify
as we compete for the business of fewer customers. There can be
no assurance that we will be able to keep our existing customers
or gain new customers. There are several large regional grocery
chains that have captive dairy operations. As the consolidation
of the grocery industry continues, we could lose sales if any
one or more of our existing customers were to be sold to a chain
with captive dairy operations.
Many of our retail customers have become increasingly price
sensitive in the current intensely competitive environment. Over
the past few years, we have been subject to a number of
competitive bidding situations in our Dairy Group segment, which
reduced our profitability on sales to several customers. We
expect this trend to continue. In bidding situations we are
subject to the risk of losing certain customers altogether. The
loss of any of our largest customers could have a material
adverse impact on our financial results. We do not have
contracts with many of our largest customers, and most of the
contracts that we do have are generally terminable at will by
the customer.
Both the difficult economic environment and the increased
competitive environment at the retail level have caused
competition to become increasingly intense at the processor
level. We expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable
future.
40
In 2005, our tax rate on continuing operations was 37.9%. We
estimate the effective tax rate for 2006 will be in the range of
38% to 38.5%. Changes in the relative profitability of our
operating segments, adoption of SFAS 123(R) related to
expensing of stock options, as well as recent and proposed
changes to federal and state tax laws may cause the rate to
change from historical rates.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those
that are both most important to the portrayal of a
companys financial condition and results, and that require
our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. In many
cases the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is
specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting
principles with no need for the application of our judgment. In
certain circumstances, however, the preparation of our
Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires us to use our judgment
to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts
of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. We have
identified the policies described below as our critical
accounting policies. See Note 1 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of these and
other accounting policies.
Accounts Receivable We provide credit terms
to customers generally ranging up to 30 days, perform
ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain
allowances for estimated credit losses. As these factors change,
our estimates change and we could accrue different amounts for
doubtful accounts in different accounting periods. At
December 31, 2005, our allowance for doubtful accounts was
approximately $22.1 million, or approximately 2.6% of the
accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2005. The
allowance for doubtful accounts, expressed as a percent of
accounts receivable, was approximately 2.9% at December 31,
2004. Each 0.10% change in the ratio of allowance for doubtful
accounts to accounts receivable would impact bad debt expense by
approximately $867,000.
Employee Benefit Plan Costs We provide a
range of benefits including pension and postretirement benefits
to our eligible employees and retirees. We record annual amounts
relating to these plans based on calculations specified by
generally accepted accounting principles, which include various
actuarial assumptions, such as discount rates, assumed
investment rates of return, compensation increases, employee
turnover rates and health care cost trend rates. We review our
actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications
to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is
deemed appropriate. As required by generally accepted accounting
principles, the effect of the modifications is generally
recorded and amortized over future periods. Different
assumptions could result in the recognition of different amounts
of expense over different periods of time.
Substantially all of our qualified pension plans are
consolidated into one master trust. We retained investment
consultants to assist our Investment Committee with the
transition of the plans assets to the master trust and to
help our Investment Committee formulate a long-term investment
policy for the newly established master trust. Our current asset
mix guidelines under the investment policy target equities at
65% to 75% of the portfolio and fixed income at 25% to 35%. At
December 31, 2005, our master trust was invested as
follows: equity securities and limited partnerships
71%; fixed income securities 27%; and cash and cash
equivalents 2%.
We determine our expected long-term rate of return based on our
expectations of future returns for the pension plans
investments based on target allocations of the pension
plans investments. Additionally, we consider the
weighted-average return of a capital markets model that was
developed by the plans investment consultants and
historical returns on comparable equity, debt and other
investments. The resulting weighted average expected long-term
rate of return on plan assets is 8.5%.
While a number of the key assumptions related to our qualified
pension plans are long-term in nature, including assumed
investment rates of return, compensation increases, employee
turnover rates and mortality
41
rates, generally accepted accounting principles require that our
discount rate assumption reflect current market conditions. As
such, our discount rate likely will change more frequently than
in prior years. The discount rate utilized to determine our
estimated future benefit obligations remained the same at 5.75%
at December 31, 2004 and 2005.
A 0.25% reduction in the assumed rate of return on plan assets
or a 0.25% reduction in the discount rate would increase our
annual pension expense by approximately $470,000 and $360,000,
respectively. In addition, a 1% increase in assumed healthcare
costs trends would increase the aggregate annual post retirement
medical expense by approximately $161,000.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Our goodwill
and intangible assets totaled $3.61 billion as of
December 31, 2005 resulting primarily from acquisitions.
Upon acquisition, the purchase price is first allocated to
identifiable assets and liabilities, including trademarks and
customer-related intangible assets, with any remaining purchase
price recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and trademarks with
indefinite lives are not amortized.
We believe that a trademark has an indefinite life if it has
sufficient market share and a history of strong sales and cash
flow performance that we expect to continue for the foreseeable
future. If these perpetual trademark criteria are not met, the
trademarks are amortized over their expected useful lives, which
generally range from five to 40 years. Determining the
expected life of a trademark requires considerable management
judgment and is based on an evaluation of a number of factors
including the competitive environment, market share, trademark
history and anticipated future trademark support.
Perpetual trademarks and goodwill are evaluated for impairment
at least annually to ensure that future cash flows continue to
exceed the related book value. A perpetual trademark is impaired
if its book value exceeds its estimated fair value. Goodwill is
evaluated for impairment if the book value of its reporting unit
exceeds its estimated fair value. A reporting unit can be a
segment or an operating division. If the fair value of an
evaluated asset is less than its book value, the asset is
written down to fair value based on its discounted future cash
flows.
Amortizable intangible assets are only evaluated for impairment
upon a significant change in the operating environment. If an
evaluation of the undiscounted cash flows indicates impairment,
the asset is written down to its estimated fair value, which is
generally based on discounted future cash flows.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the
impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows.
Assumptions used in our impairment evaluations, such as
forecasted growth rates and our cost of capital, are consistent
with our internal projections and operating plans.
We did not recognize any impairment charges for perpetual
trademarks or goodwill during 2005.
Income Taxes Deferred taxes are recognized
for future tax effects of temporary differences between
financial and income tax reporting using tax rates in effect for
the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. We
periodically estimate our probable tax obligations using
historical experience in tax jurisdictions and informed
judgments. There are inherent uncertainties related to the
interpretations of tax regulations in the jurisdictions in which
we operate. These judgments and estimates made at a point in
time may change based on the outcome of tax audits and changes
to or further interpretations of regulations. If such changes
take place, there is a risk that our tax rate may increase or
decrease in any period, which could have an impact on our
earnings. Future business results may affect deferred tax
liabilities or the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.
Our valuation allowance decreased $481,000 in 2005 in
anticipation of the expected realization of net operating loss
carryforwards that were previously reserved.
Insurance Accruals We retain selected levels
of property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee
health care, workers compensation claims and other
casualty losses. Many of these potential losses are covered
under conventional insurance programs with third-party carriers
with high deductible limits. In other areas, we are self-insured
with stop-loss coverages. Accrued liabilities for incurred but
not reported losses related to these retained risks are
calculated based upon loss development factors which contemplate
a number of variables including claims history and expected
trends. These loss development factors are
42
developed by us in consultation with external insurance brokers
and actuaries. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, we recorded
accrued liabilities related to these retained risks of
$161.2 million and $143.0 million, respectively,
including both current and long-term liabilities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for Conditional
Asset Retirement Obligations in March 2005. This
Interpretation clarifies the term conditional asset
retirement obligation as used in FASB Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, and
also clarifies when an entity should have sufficient information
to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement
obligation. We adopted this standard during the fourth quarter
of 2005. We recognized expense of $1.6 million, net of tax,
in 2005 as a cumulative change in accounting principle as a
result of adopting the standard. See Note 5 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements The
FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment in December 2004. It will require the cost of
employee compensation paid with equity instruments to be
measured based on grant-date fair values. That cost will be
recognized over the vesting period. SFAS No. 123(R)
became effective for us in the first quarter of 2006. As
permitted under the Statement we will adopt the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) retroactively. The historical pro
forma expense we have reported will be the expense applied for
our retroactive adoption of the Statement. Refer to the section
titled Stock-Based Compensation in Note 1 to
our Consolidated Financial Statements for an illustration of the
pro forma impact of expensing our stock options in the
historical periods.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an Amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151, which
is effective for inventory costs incurred during years beginning
after June 15, 2005, clarifies the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and
wasted material, requiring that those items be recognized as
current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads be based
on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The
adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB
Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 is effective
for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the
rule in APB No. 29 which excluded from fair value
measurement exchanges of similar productive assets. Instead
SFAS No. 153 excludes from fair value measurement
exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial
substance. We do not believe the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
| Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Interest Rate Fluctuations
In order to reduce the volatility of earnings that arises from
changes in interest rates, we manage interest rate risk through
the use of interest rate swap agreements. These swap agreements
provide hedges for loans under our senior credit facility by
limiting or fixing the LIBOR interest rates specified in the
senior credit facility at the interest rates noted below until
the indicated expiration dates.
The following table summarizes our various interest rate swap
agreements as of December 31, 2005:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
3.65% to 6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
4.81% to 4.84%
|
|
|
December 2007 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
4.07% to 4.27%
|
|
|
December 2010 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
43
The following table summarizes our various interest rate swap
agreements as of December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
5.20% to 6.74%
|
|
|
December 2005 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
3.65% to 6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
We are exposed to market risk under these arrangements due to
the possibility of interest rates on our credit facilities
falling below the rates on our interest rate derivative
agreements. We incurred $8.5 million of additional interest
expense, net of taxes, during 2005 as a result of interest rates
on our variable rate debt falling below the agreed-upon interest
rate on our existing swap agreements. Credit risk under these
arrangements is remote because the counter parties to our
interest rate derivative agreements are major financial
institutions.
A majority of our debt obligations are currently at variable
rates. We have performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a
hypothetical 10% adverse movement in interest rates. As of
December 31, 2005, the analysis indicated that such
interest rate movement would not have a material effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
However, actual gains and losses in the future may differ
materially from that analysis based on changes in the timing and
amount of interest rate movement and our actual exposure and
hedges.
Foreign Currency
We are exposed to foreign currency risk due to operating cash
flows and various financial instruments that are denominated in
foreign currencies. Our most significant foreign currency
exposures relate to the euro and the British pound. We have
performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypothetical 10%
adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates. As of
December 31, 2005 and 2004, the analysis indicated that
such foreign currency exchange rate change would not have a
material effect on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
Butterfat
Our Dairy Group utilizes a significant amount of butterfat to
produce Class II products. This butterfat is acquired
through the purchase of raw milk and bulk cream. Butterfat
acquired in raw milk is priced based on the Class II
butterfat price in federal orders, which is announced near the
end of the applicable month. The Class II butterfat price
can generally be tied to the pricing of AA butter traded on the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). The cost of
butterfat acquired in bulk cream is typically based on a
multiple of the AA butter price on the CME. From time to time,
we purchase butter futures and butter inventory in an effort to
better manage our butterfat cost in Class II products.
Futures contracts are marked to market in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and physical inventory
is valued at the lower of cost or market. We are exposed to
market risk under these arrangements if the cost of butter falls
below the cost that we have agreed to pay in a futures contract
or that we actually paid for the physical inventory and we are
unable to pass on the difference to our customers. At this time
we believe that potential losses due to butterfat hedging
activities would not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or operating cash flow.
44
|
|
| Item 8. |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
Our Consolidated Financial Statements for 2005 are included in
this report on the following pages.
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Dean Foods Company
Dallas, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Dean Foods Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dean
Foods Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and
2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2005 the Company changed its method of accounting
for conditional asset retirement obligations to conform to
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 47.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 8, 2006,
expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 8, 2006
F-1
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, | |
| |
|
except share data) | |
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
25,120 |
|
|
$ |
27,407 |
|
| |
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $22,120
and $24,093
|
|
|
867,398 |
|
|
|
828,754 |
|
| |
Inventories
|
|
|
380,209 |
|
|
|
365,403 |
|
| |
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
137,776 |
|
|
|
143,079 |
|
| |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
66,465 |
|
|
|
72,439 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,476,968 |
|
|
|
1,437,082 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,874,486 |
|
|
|
1,813,284 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,014,879 |
|
|
|
3,100,446 |
|
|
Identifiable intangible and other assets
|
|
|
684,551 |
|
|
|
672,852 |
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732,704 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,050,884 |
|
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
983,805 |
|
|
$ |
869,163 |
|
| |
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
45,282 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
| |
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
108,243 |
|
|
|
141,012 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,137,330 |
|
|
|
1,050,175 |
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,328,592 |
|
|
|
3,110,716 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
487,247 |
|
|
|
483,540 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
225,636 |
|
|
|
322,378 |
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,960 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Preferred stock, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common stock 134,209,190 and 149,222,997 shares issued and
outstanding, with a par value of $0.01 per share
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
| |
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
702,120 |
|
|
|
1,308,172 |
|
| |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,194,550 |
|
|
|
1,359,632 |
|
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(25,933 |
) |
|
|
(5,697 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,872,079 |
|
|
|
2,663,599 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,050,884 |
|
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
10,505,560 |
|
|
$ |
10,036,277 |
|
|
$ |
8,390,985 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
7,919,252 |
|
|
|
7,641,368 |
|
|
|
6,214,729 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,586,308 |
|
|
|
2,394,909 |
|
|
|
2,176,256 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,561,688 |
|
|
|
1,450,480 |
|
|
|
1,290,728 |
|
| |
General and administrative
|
|
|
372,750 |
|
|
|
333,179 |
|
|
|
304,422 |
|
| |
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
5,173 |
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
| |
Facility closing and reorganization costs
|
|
|
38,583 |
|
|
|
24,575 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
| |
Other operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,899 |
) |
|
|
(68,719 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,979,217 |
|
|
|
1,807,508 |
|
|
|
1,541,823 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
607,091 |
|
|
|
587,401 |
|
|
|
634,433 |
|
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest expense
|
|
|
168,984 |
|
|
|
198,900 |
|
|
|
173,945 |
|
| |
Financing charges on trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,164 |
|
| |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
| |
Other income, net
|
|
|
(789 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
168,195 |
|
|
|
198,530 |
|
|
|
185,335 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
438,896 |
|
|
|
388,871 |
|
|
|
449,098 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
166,423 |
|
|
|
149,710 |
|
|
|
173,559 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
272,473 |
|
|
|
239,161 |
|
|
|
275,539 |
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
38,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
|
|
46,213 |
|
|
|
80,164 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
329,083 |
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
327,531 |
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
146,673,322 |
|
|
|
154,635,979 |
|
|
|
145,201,412 |
|
| |
Diluted
|
|
|
153,438,636 |
|
|
|
160,704,576 |
|
|
|
160,695,670 |
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
| |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
| |
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
| |
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
| |
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Additional | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
Comprehensive | |
| |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Paid-In Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Equity | |
|
Income | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | |
|
Balance, January 1, 2003
|
|
|
132,961,440 |
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
979,113 |
|
|
$ |
718,555 |
|
|
$ |
(55,705 |
) |
|
$ |
1,643,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
5,798,235 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
121,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Exchange of trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
22,901,839 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
582,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
(6,668,300 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(185,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
| |
Other comprehensive income (Note 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,650 |
) |
|
|
(7,650 |
) |
|
|
(7,650 |
) |
| |
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,610 |
|
|
|
25,610 |
|
|
|
25,610 |
|
| |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
| |
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,356 |
) |
|
|
(10,356 |
) |
|
|
(10,356 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
381,554 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
154,993,214 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,498,025 |
|
|
|
1,074,258 |
|
|
|
(29,854 |
) |
|
|
2,543,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,539,783 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
86,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Horizon Organic stock option conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
(9,310,000 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(296,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
| |
Other comprehensive income (Note 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(717 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
| |
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,723 |
|
|
|
20,723 |
|
|
|
20,723 |
|
| |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
| |
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,162 |
) |
|
|
(13,162 |
) |
|
|
(13,162 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
309,531 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
149,222,997 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
1,308,172 |
|
|
|
1,359,632 |
|
|
|
(5,697 |
) |
|
|
2,663,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,867,493 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
93,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Share dividend of TreeHouse common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(492,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
(18,881,300 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(699,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(699,878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,531 |
|
|
$ |
327,531 |
|
| |
Other comprehensive income (Note 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,290 |
|
|
|
11,290 |
|
|
|
11,290 |
|
| |
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
| |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,220 |
) |
|
|
(28,220 |
) |
|
|
(28,220 |
) |
| |
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,816 |
) |
|
|
(11,816 |
) |
|
|
(11,816 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
307,295 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
134,209,190 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
702,120 |
|
|
$ |
1,194,550 |
|
|
$ |
(25,933 |
) |
|
$ |
1,872,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
327,531 |
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
| |
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(17,847 |
) |
|
|
(46,213 |
) |
|
|
(80,164 |
) |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
221,291 |
|
|
|
206,589 |
|
|
|
176,668 |
|
| |
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
| |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
(38,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Gain on sale of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(66,168 |
) |
| |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
| |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Write-down of impaired assets
|
|
|
11,978 |
|
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
| |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
38,042 |
|
|
|
135,451 |
|
|
|
122,477 |
|
| |
|
Tax savings on equity compensation
|
|
|
20,614 |
|
|
|
18,526 |
|
|
|
26,380 |
|
| |
|
Costs related to early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,699 |
) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
(6,168 |
) |
| |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(37,657 |
) |
|
|
(84,566 |
) |
|
|
(66,570 |
) |
| |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(16,001 |
) |
|
|
(53,791 |
) |
|
|
(11,526 |
) |
| |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
19,217 |
|
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
|
|
19,746 |
|
| |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
49,440 |
|
|
|
(69,882 |
) |
|
|
(72,031 |
) |
| |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(37,139 |
) |
|
|
(9,974 |
) |
|
|
27,893 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
541,019 |
|
|
|
420,732 |
|
|
|
427,149 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
18,641 |
|
|
|
107,865 |
|
|
|
97,621 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
559,660 |
|
|
|
528,597 |
|
|
|
524,770 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(306,837 |
) |
|
|
(333,804 |
) |
|
|
(271,576 |
) |
| |
Cash outflows for acquisitions and investments
|
|
|
(1,784 |
) |
|
|
(400,035 |
) |
|
|
(233,997 |
) |
| |
Net proceeds from divestitures
|
|
|
189,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,950 |
|
| |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
8,914 |
|
|
|
10,617 |
|
|
|
11,807 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(109,845 |
) |
|
|
(723,222 |
) |
|
|
(403,816 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
(7,875 |
) |
|
|
(23,349 |
) |
|
|
(32,357 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(117,720 |
) |
|
|
(746,571 |
) |
|
|
(436,173 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
290,552 |
|
|
|
1,658,846 |
|
|
|
349,680 |
|
| |
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(114,837 |
) |
|
|
(1,216,964 |
) |
|
|
(322,382 |
) |
| |
Payments of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(4,279 |
) |
|
|
(9,801 |
) |
|
|
(5,200 |
) |
| |
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses
|
|
|
73,062 |
|
|
|
67,946 |
|
|
|
95,270 |
|
| |
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
(699,878 |
) |
|
|
(297,018 |
) |
|
|
(199,521 |
) |
| |
Redemption of trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,420 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations
|
|
|
(455,380 |
) |
|
|
203,009 |
|
|
|
(84,573 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations
|
|
|
11,153 |
|
|
|
(3,665 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(444,227 |
) |
|
|
199,344 |
|
|
|
(84,882 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,287 |
) |
|
|
(18,630 |
) |
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
27,407 |
|
|
|
46,037 |
|
|
|
42,322 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
25,120 |
|
|
$ |
27,407 |
|
|
$ |
46,037 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
| 1. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Nature of Our Business We are a leading food
and beverage company. Our Dairy Group is the largest processor
and distributor of milk and various other dairy products in the
United States. The Dairy Group sells its products under a
variety of local and regional brands and under private labels.
Our WhiteWave Foods Company manufactures, markets and sells a
variety of well-known soy, dairy and dairy-related nationally
branded products such as
Silk®
soymilk and cultured soy products, Horizon
Organic®
dairy products, International
Delight®
coffee creamers and LAND
OLAKES®
creamers and fluid dairy products. Our International Group is
one of the largest processors and distributors of fluid milk in
Spain and Portugal.
Basis of Presentation Our Consolidated
Financial Statements include the accounts of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
On June 27, 2005, we completed the spin-off
(Spin-off) of our indirect majority owned subsidiary
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (TreeHouse). Immediately prior
to the Spin-off, we transferred to TreeHouse (1) the
businesses previously conducted by our Specialty Foods Group
segment, (2) the Mocha
Mix®
and Second
Nature®
businesses previously conducted by WhiteWave Foods Company,
and (3) the foodservice salad dressings businesses
previously conducted by the Dairy Group and WhiteWave Foods
Company. In August 2005, we completed the sale of our
Maries®
dips and dressings and
Deans®
dips businesses to Ventura Foods. In our Consolidated Financial
Statements for the years ended 2004 and 2003, the businesses
transferred to TreeHouse and the Maries dips and dressings
and Deans dips businesses have been reclassified as
discontinued operations.
Use of Estimates The preparation of our
Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires us to
use our judgment to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of
net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Cash Equivalents We consider temporary cash
investments with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Our products are valued using the
first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method. The costs of finished goods
inventories include raw materials, direct labor and indirect
production and overhead costs.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are stated at acquisition cost, plus capitalized
interest on borrowings during the actual construction period of
major capital projects. Also included in property, plant and
equipment are certain direct costs related to the implementation
of computer software for internal use. Depreciation and
amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:
| |
|
|
| Asset |
|
Useful Life |
| |
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
7 to 40 years |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 to 20 years |
We perform impairment tests when circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Capitalized leases are
amortized over the shorter of their lease term or their
estimated useful lives. Expenditures for repairs and
maintenance, which do not improve or extend the life of the
assets, are expensed as incurred.
F-6
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible and Other Assets Identifiable
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful
lives as follows:
| |
|
|
| Asset |
|
Useful Life |
| |
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
Straight-line method over 5 to 15 years
|
|
Customer supply contracts
|
|
Straight-line method over the terms of the agreements
|
|
Trademarks/trade names
|
|
Straight-line method over 5 to 40 years
|
|
Noncompetition agreements
|
|
Straight-line method over the terms of the agreements
|
|
Patents
|
|
Straight-line method over 15 years
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
Interest method over the terms of the related debt
|
Effective January 1, 2002, in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
goodwill and other intangible assets determined to have
indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized. Instead, we now
conduct impairment tests on our goodwill, trademarks and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives annually and when
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. To determine whether an impairment exists, we use
present value techniques.
Foreign Currency Translation The financial
statements of our foreign subsidiaries are translated to
U.S. dollars in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is generally
the local currency of the country. Accordingly, assets and
liabilities of the foreign subsidiaries are translated to
U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. Income and expense
items are translated at the average rates prevailing during the
year. Changes in exchange rates that affect cash flows and the
related receivables or payables are recognized as transaction
gains and losses in the determination of net income. The
cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders equity
reflects the unrealized adjustments resulting from translating
the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries.
Stock-Based Compensation We have elected to
follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations in accounting for our stock options. All
options granted to date have been to employees, officers and
directors. No compensation expense has been recognized as the
stock options were granted at exercise prices that were at or
above market value at the grant date. Compensation expense for
grants of stock units (SUs) is recognized over the
vesting period. See Note 11 for more information about our
stock option and SU programs. Had compensation expense been
determined for stock option grants using fair value methods
provided for in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
F-7
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation, our pro forma net income and net
income per common share would have been the amounts indicated
below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
327,531 |
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
income, net of tax
|
|
|
11,275 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value-based methods for all awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(30,152 |
) |
|
|
(35,281 |
) |
|
|
(36,614 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
308,654 |
|
|
$ |
253,721 |
|
|
$ |
321,485 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
pro forma
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
| |
|
pro forma
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
Stock option share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Stock options granted during period
|
|
|
2,466,594 |
|
|
|
2,392,658 |
|
|
|
3,508,667 |
|
| |
Weighted average option fair value
|
|
$ |
8.13 |
|
|
$ |
8.87 |
|
|
$ |
11.61 |
|
|
SU data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SUs granted during period
|
|
|
459,050 |
|
|
|
475,750 |
|
|
|
806,800 |
|
| |
Weighted average unit fair value
|
|
$ |
32.74 |
|
|
$ |
31.59 |
|
|
$ |
25.06 |
|
The fair value of each stock option grant is calculated using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following
assumptions:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
37 to 38% |
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
Expected option term
|
|
|
4.5 years |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
7 years |
|
|
Risk-free rate of return
|
|
|
3.63 to 4.27% |
|
|
|
2.98 to 3.81% |
|
|
|
3.03 to 4.00% |
|
Sales Recognition and Accounts Receivable
Sales are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the product has been
shipped to the customer and there is a reasonable assurance of
collection of the sales proceeds. In accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) 01-09, Accounting for
Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer, sales are
reduced by certain sales incentives, some of which are recorded
by estimating expense based on our historical experience. We
provide credit terms to customers generally ranging up to
30 days, perform ongoing credit evaluation of our customers
and maintain allowances for potential credit losses based on
historical experience. Estimated product returns, which have not
been material, are deducted from sales at the time of shipment.
Income Taxes All of our wholly-owned
U.S. operating subsidiaries are included in our
consolidated tax return. In addition, our proportional share of
the operations of our former majority-owned subsidiaries and
certain of our equity method affiliates, all of which are
organized as limited liability companies or limited
partnerships, are included in our consolidated tax return. Our
foreign subsidiaries are required to file separate income tax
returns in their local jurisdictions. Certain distributions from
these subsidiaries are subject to U.S. income taxes;
however, available tax credits of these subsidiaries may reduce
or eliminate these
F-8
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
U.S. income tax liabilities. Other foreign earnings are
expected to be reinvested indefinitely. At December 31,
2005, no provision had been made for U.S. federal or state
income tax on approximately $26.0 million of accumulated
foreign earnings.
Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences
between amounts recorded in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using current
tax rates. Deferred tax assets, including the benefit of net
operating loss carry-forwards, are evaluated based on the
guidelines for realization and are reduced by a valuation
allowance if deemed necessary.
Advertising Expense Advertising expense is
comprised of media, agency, coupon, trade shows and other
promotional expenses. Advertising expenses are charged to income
during the period incurred, except for expenses related to the
development of a major commercial or media campaign which are
charged to income during the period in which the advertisement
or campaign is first presented by the media. Advertising
expenses charged to income totaled $96.6 million in 2005,
$116.5 million in 2004 and $105.5 million in 2003.
Additionally, prepaid advertising costs were $4.9 million
and $3.6 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Shipping and Handling Fees Our shipping and
handling costs are included in both cost of sales and selling
and distribution expense, depending on the nature of such costs.
Shipping and handling costs included in cost of sales reflect
inventory warehouse costs and product loading and handling
costs. Our Dairy Group includes costs associated with
transporting finished products from our manufacturing facilities
to our own distribution warehouses within cost of sales while
WhiteWave Foods Company includes these costs in selling and
distribution expense. Shipping and handling costs included in
selling and distribution expense consist primarily of route
delivery costs for both company-owned delivery routes and
independent distributor routes, to the extent that such
independent distributors are paid a delivery fee, and the cost
of shipping products to customers through third party carriers.
Shipping and handling costs that were recorded as a component of
selling and distribution expense were approximately
$1.20 billion, $1.11 billion and $973.4 million
during 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Insurance Accruals We retain selected levels
of property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee
health care, workers compensation claims and other
casualty losses. Many of these potential losses are covered
under conventional insurance programs with third party carriers
with high deductible limits. In other areas, we are self-insured
with stop-loss coverages. Accrued liabilities for incurred but
not reported losses related to these retained risks are
calculated based upon loss development factors which contemplate
a number of factors including claims history and expected
trends. These loss development factors are developed by us in
consultation with external insurance brokers and actuaries.
Facility Closing and Reorganization Costs We
have an on-going facility closing and reorganization strategy.
We record facility closing and reorganization charges when we
have identified a facility for closure or other reorganization
opportunity, developed a plan and notified the affected
employees.
Comprehensive Income We consider all changes
in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances,
except those resulting from investments by owners and
distributions to owners, to be comprehensive income.
Stock Split On June 9, 2003, we effected
a three-for-two split of our common stock. All share numbers
contained in our Consolidated Financial Statements and in these
Notes have been adjusted for all periods to reflect the stock
splits.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Financial Interpretation No. (FIN) 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations in March 2005. This Interpretation clarifies
the term conditional asset retirement obligation as
used in FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset
F-9
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Retirement Obligations, and also clarifies when an entity
should have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the
fair value of an asset retirement obligation. We adopted this
standard in the fourth quarter of 2005. We recognized expense of
$1.6 million, net of tax, as a cumulative change in
accounting principal as a result of adopting the Standard. See
Note 5 for additional information.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements The
FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment in December 2004. It will require the cost of
employee compensation paid with equity instruments to be
measured based on grant-date fair values. That cost will be
recognized over the vesting period. SFAS No. 123(R)
became effective for us in the first quarter of 2006. As
permitted under the Statement we will adopt the provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) retroactively. The historical pro
forma expense we have reported will be the expense applied for
our retroactive adoption of the Statement.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an Amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151, which
is effective for inventory costs incurred during years beginning
after June 15, 2005, clarifies the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and
wasted material, requiring that those items be recognized as
current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads be based
on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The
adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB
Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 is effective
for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the
rule in APB No. 29 which excluded from fair value
measurement exchanges of similar productive assets. Instead
SFAS No. 153 excludes from fair value measurement
exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial
substance. We do not believe the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications
have been made to conform the prior years Consolidated
Financial Statements to the current year classifications.
|
|
| 2. |
ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
We completed the acquisitions of 23 businesses during 2005, 2004
and 2003. All of these acquisitions were funded with cash flows
from operations and borrowings under our credit facility and our
accounts receivables-backed facility.
All acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting as of their respective acquisition dates, and
accordingly, only the results of operations of the acquired
companies subsequent to their respective acquisition dates are
included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. At the
acquisition date, the purchase price was allocated to assets
acquired, including identifiable intangibles, and liabilities
assumed based on their fair market values. The excess of the
total purchase prices over the fair values of the net assets
F-10
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
acquired represented goodwill. In connection with the
acquisitions, assets were acquired and liabilities were assumed
as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Purchase prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash paid, net of cash acquired(1)
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
400,035 |
|
|
$ |
233,997 |
|
| |
Forgiveness of debt
|
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total purchase prices
|
|
|
3,363 |
|
|
|
400,035 |
|
|
|
233,997 |
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Assets acquired
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
259,610 |
|
|
|
97,633 |
|
| |
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
(165,809 |
) |
|
|
(28,942 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
93,801 |
|
|
|
68,691 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
2,031 |
|
|
$ |
306,234 |
|
|
$ |
165,306 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
In 2005, excludes a net amount of $528,000 received in 2005
related to 2004 acquisitions. |
During 2005, our Dairy Group completed several small
acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of
$3.4 million.
Milk Products of Alabama On October 15,
2004, our Dairy Group acquired Milk Products of Alabama, a dairy
manufacturer based in Decatur, Alabama. Milk Products of Alabama
had net sales of approximately $34 million in 2003. As a
result of this acquisition, we expanded our production
capabilities in the southeastern United States, allowing us to
better serve our customers. Milk Products of Alabamas
results of operations are now included in the Morningstar
division of our Dairy Group. We paid approximately
$23.2 million for the purchase of Milk Products of Alabama,
including costs of acquisition, and funded the purchase price
with borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Tiger Foods On May 31, 2004, Leche
Celta, our Spanish subsidiary, acquired Tiger Foods, a dairy
processing business with one facility located in Avila, Spain.
Tiger Foods, which had net sales of approximately
$29 million in 2003, manufactures and distributes branded
and private label UHT milk and dairy-based drinks throughout
Spain, with an emphasis in the southern and central regions.
Tiger Foods operations complement our Spanish operations
and this acquisition has allowed us to reduce our transportation
costs for raw milk and finished products due to their geographic
proximity to our raw milk suppliers and certain customers. We
paid approximately $21.9 million for the purchase of the
company, all of which was funded with borrowings under our
senior credit facility.
Soy Processing Facility On April 5,
2004, our WhiteWave Foods Company acquired a soy processing and
packaging plant located in Bridgeton, New Jersey. Prior to the
acquisition, the previous owner of the facility co-packed
Silk products for us at the facility. As a result of the
acquisition, we increased our in-house processing and packaging
capabilities for our soy products, resulting in cost reductions.
We paid approximately $25.7 million for the purchase of the
facility, all of which was funded using borrowings under our
senior credit facility.
F-11
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
LAND OLAKES East In 2002, we purchased
a perpetual license to use the LAND
OLAKES®
brand on certain dairy products nationally, excluding cheese and
butter. This perpetual license was subject, however, to a
pre-existing sublicense entitling a competitor to manufacture
and sell cream, sour cream and whipping cream in certain
channels in the eastern United States. Effective March 31,
2004, WhiteWave Foods Company acquired that sublicense and
certain customer relationships of the sublicensee (LAND
OLAKES East) for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $17 million, all of which was funded using
borrowings under our senior credit facility. We now have the
exclusive right to use the LAND OLAKES brand on
certain dairy products (other than cheese and butter) throughout
the entire United States.
Ross Swiss Dairies On January 26, 2004,
our Dairy Group acquired Ross Swiss Dairies, a dairy distributor
based in Los Angeles, California, which had net sales of
approximately $120 million in 2003. As a result of this
acquisition, we increased the distribution capability of our
Dairy Group in southern California, allowing us to better serve
our customers. Ross Swiss Dairies historically purchased a
significant portion of its products from other processors. The
fluid dairy products distributed by Ross Swiss Dairies are now
manufactured in our southern California facilities. We paid
approximately $21.8 million, including transaction costs,
for the purchase of Ross Swiss Dairies and funded the purchase
price with borrowings under our receivables-backed facility.
Horizon Organic On January 2, 2004, we
completed the acquisition of the 87% of Horizon Organic Holding
Corporation (Horizon Organic) that we did not
already own. Horizon Organic had sales of over $200 million
during 2003. We already owned approximately 13% of the
outstanding common stock of Horizon Organic as a result of
investments made in 1998. Third-party co-packers, including us,
historically manufactured all of Horizon Organics
products. During 2003, we produced approximately 27% of Horizon
Organics fluid dairy products. We also distributed Horizon
Organics products in several parts of the country. Horizon
Organic is a leading branded organic foods company in the United
States. Because organic foods are gaining popularity with
consumers and because Horizon Organics products offer
consumers an alternative to our Dairy Groups traditional
dairy products, we believe Horizon Organic is an important
addition to our portfolio of brands. The aggregate purchase
price for the 87% of Horizon Organic that we did not already own
was approximately $287 million, including approximately
$217 million of cash paid to Horizon Organics
stockholders, the repayment of approximately $40 million of
borrowings under Horizon Organics former credit
facilities, and transaction expenses of approximately
$9 million, all of which was funded using borrowings under
our senior credit facility and our receivables-backed facility.
In addition, each of the options to purchase Horizon
Organics common stock outstanding on January 2, 2004
was converted into an option to purchase .7301 shares of
our stock, with an aggregate fair value of approximately
$21 million. Beginning with the first quarter of 2004,
Horizon Organics financial results are reported in our
WhiteWave Foods Company segment.
Other During 2004, our Dairy Group completed
several smaller acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of
$23.3 million.
Kohler Mix On October 15, 2003, we
acquired Kohler Mix Specialties, Inc., the dairy products
division of Michael Foods, Inc. Kohlers product line
consists primarily of private label ultra-pasteurized ice cream
mixes, creamers and creams, sold primarily in the foodservice
channel. Kohler is included in the Morningstar division of our
Dairy Group segment. The acquisition of Kohler increased the
Dairy Groups ultra-high temperature processing capacity,
which we needed to meet the expanding needs of our WhiteWave
Foods Company segment. Kohler had net sales of approximately
$187.5 million for the 12 months ended August 31,
2003 and has three facilities located in White Bear Lake,
Minnesota, Sulphur Springs, Texas and Newington, Connecticut. We
paid approximately $158.6 million for the purchase of
Kohler, all of which was funded using borrowings under our
receivables-backed facility.
F-12
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Melody Farms On June 9, 2003, our Dairy
Group acquired Melody Farms, LLC. Melody Farms, which is now a
part of the East region of our Dairy Group, is a regional dairy
processor based in Livonia, Michigan, that produced fluid dairy
and ice cream products from two facilities in Michigan. Our
acquisition of Melody Farms expanded our distribution reach and
allows us to better serve our customers in the Michigan area.
Melody Farms had net sales of approximately $116 million
during the 12 months ended March 31, 2003. We paid
approximately $52.7 million for Melody Farms, all of which
was funded using borrowings under our receivables-backed
facility.
Other During 2003, our Dairy Group completed
several small acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of
$22.6 million.
In order to more closely align both our assets and our
management resources with our strategic direction, part of our
strategy is to divest certain non-core assets. On July 31,
2003, we completed the sale of our frozen pre-whipped topping
and frozen coffee creamer operations. We recorded a pre-tax gain
on the sale of approximately $66.2 million. Also in July
2003, we sold certain Dairy Group delivery trucks and customer
relationships in New York. The proceeds from the sale of
businesses during 2003 were approximately $90 million.
Sale of Maries Dips and Dressings and Deans
Dips On August 22, 2005, we completed the
sale of tangible and intangible assets related to the production
and distribution of Maries dips and dressings and
Deans dips to Ventura Foods. We also agreed to
license the Dean trademark to Ventura Foods for use on certain
non-dairy dips. The sales price was approximately
$194 million. The sale of these brands was part of our
strategy to focus on our core dairy and branded businesses.
Spin-off of TreeHouse On January 25,
2005, we formed TreeHouse. At that time, TreeHouse sold shares
of common stock to certain members of a newly retained
management team, who purchased approximately 1.67% of the
outstanding common stock of TreeHouse, for an aggregate purchase
price of $10 million. The proceeds from this transaction
were distributed to us as a dividend and are reflected within
stockholders equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
On June 27, 2005, we completed the Spin-off. Immediately
prior to the Spin-off, we transferred to TreeHouse (1) the
businesses previously conducted by our Specialty Foods Group
segment, (2) the Mocha Mix and Second Nature
businesses previously conducted by WhiteWave Foods Company, and
(3) the foodservice salad dressings businesses previously
conducted by the Dairy Group and WhiteWave Foods Company. The
Spin-off was effected by means of a share dividend of the
TreeHouse common stock held by us to our stockholders of record
on June 20, 2005 (the Record Date). In the
distribution, our stockholders received one share of TreeHouse
common stock for every five shares of our common stock held by
them on the Record Date.
Prior to the Spin-off, we entered into certain agreements with
TreeHouse to define our ongoing relationship. These arrangements
include agreements that define our respective responsibilities
for taxes, employee matters and all other liabilities and
obligations related to the transferred businesses. In addition,
we entered into a co-pack agreement under which we will continue
to manufacture certain products for TreeHouse and TreeHouse will
continue to manufacture certain products for us for a
transitional period. Our anticipated future sales to and
purchases from TreeHouse are not expected to be significant.
Following the Spin-off, we have no ownership interest in
TreeHouse.
Prior to the Spin-off, we transferred the obligation, net of
estimated related plan assets, for pension and other
postretirement benefit plans of transferred employees and
retirees to TreeHouse. During the fourth
F-13
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
quarter of 2005, we finalized the preliminary computations and
transferred a portion of the plan assets related to such
obligations. The remaining transfer of plan assets will be made
in the first quarter of 2006.
Our financial statements have been reclassified to give effect
to the businesses transferred to TreeHouse, as well as
Maries dips and dressings and Deans
dips businesses as discontinued operations.
Net sales and income before taxes generated by discontinued
operations were as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004(1) | |
|
2003(1) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
394,760 |
|
|
$ |
786,008 |
|
|
$ |
793,631 |
|
|
Income before taxes(2)
|
|
|
31,898 |
|
|
|
73,504 |
|
|
|
124,457 |
|
|
|
| (1) |
All intercompany sales and expenses have been appropriately
eliminated in the table. |
| |
| (2) |
Corporate interest expense of $3.7 million,
$5.6 million and $7.1 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, was allocated to our Maries dips and
dressings and Deans dips discontinued operations
based on the ratio of our investment in discontinued operations
to total debt and equity. |
Major classes of assets and liabilities of discontinued
operations included in our balance sheet at December 31,
2004 (in thousands) are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
159,342 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
389,683 |
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
183,679 |
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
56,252 |
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
69,708 |
|
|
|
| 3. |
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
Investment in Consolidated Container Company
We own an approximately 25% minority interest, on a fully
diluted basis, in Consolidated Container Company
(CCC), one of the nations largest
manufacturers of rigid plastic containers and our largest
supplier of plastic bottles and bottle components. We have owned
our minority interest since July 2, 1999, when we sold our
U.S. plastic packaging operations to CCC.
Since July 2, 1999, our investment in CCC has been
accounted for under the equity method of accounting. During
2001, due to a variety of operational difficulties, CCC
consistently reported operating results that were significantly
weaker than expected, which resulted in significant losses in
the third and fourth quarters of 2001. As a result, by late 2001
CCC had become unable to comply with the financial covenants
contained in its credit facility. We concluded that our
investment was impaired and that the impairment was not
temporary so we wrote off our remaining investment during the
fourth quarter of 2001.
In 2002, we agreed to loan CCC $10 million of their
$35 million financing requirements in exchange for
cancellation of a pre-existing $10 million loan guaranty we
provided to them, as well as, for the receipt of additional
equity. Vestar Capital Partners, majority owner of CCC, loaned
CCC the remaining $25 million. We were required to
recognize a portion of CCCs 2002 losses, up to the amount
of the loan. The loan was written off in its entirety in the
fourth quarter of 2002. In 2004, in connection with a
refinancing of CCC, our $10 million loan plus
$1.9 million in accrued interest was repaid through the
issuance of 11,938,056 Series B Preferred Units from CCC.
The Series B Units are convertible into common shares or a
combination of common shares and Series C Preferred Units,
at various times and subject to certain conditions. This
transaction had no impact on our 2004 consolidated statement of
income.
Our investment in CCC has been recorded at $0 since we wrote-off
our remaining investment in 2001.
F-14
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Less than 1% of CCC is owned indirectly by Alan Bernon,
President of our Dairy Group, and his brother Peter Bernon.
Pursuant to our agreements with Vestar, we control two of the
eight seats on CCCs Management Committee. We have supply
agreements with CCC to purchase certain of our requirements for
plastic bottles and bottle components from CCC. We spent
approximately $324.1 million, $235.5 million and
$167.9 million on products purchased from CCC for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In
the fourth quarter of 2004, we purchased equipment previously
owned and operated by CCC totaling $3.2 million.
Investment in Horizon Organic At
December 31, 2003, we had an approximately 13% interest in
Horizon Organic. We accounted for this investment under the
equity method of accounting. On January 2, 2004, we
acquired the 87% of Horizon Organic that we did not already own
and began consolidating Horizon Organics results with our
financial results. Our equity in earnings in Horizon Organic
included in our consolidated statement of income for 2003 was
income of $244,000.
Investment in Momentx As of December 31,
2005 and 2004, we had an approximately 16% voting interest in
Momentx, Inc. Our investment in Momentx at both
December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $1.2 million. Momentx
is the owner and operator of dairy.com, an online
vertical exchange dedicated to the dairy industry. We account
for this investment under the cost method of accounting. We
spent approximately $444,000, $664,000 and $636,000 on products
purchased from dairy.com for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$ |
167,615 |
|
|
$ |
159,366 |
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
212,594 |
|
|
|
206,037 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
380,209 |
|
|
$ |
365,403 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Land
|
|
$ |
171,554 |
|
|
$ |
161,519 |
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
731,343 |
|
|
|
665,416 |
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,863,312 |
|
|
|
1,744,114 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2,766,209 |
|
|
|
2,571,049 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(891,723 |
) |
|
|
(757,765 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
1,874,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,813,284 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2005 and 2004, we capitalized $3.9 million and
$3.3 million in interest related to borrowings during the
actual construction period of major capital projects, which is
included as part of the cost of the related asset.
In the fourth quarter of 2005 we adopted FIN No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations. As a result of the adoption we increased the
carrying value of our assets by $285,000, net of accumulated
depreciation, and recognized asset retirement obligations of
$2.8 million at December 31, 2005. We recognized
$2.5 million ($1.6 million, net of tax) as a
cumulative change in accounting principal in 2005
F-15
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for depreciation expense on the increase in property, plant and
equipment related to the anticipated removal costs of
underground fuel storage tanks.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
WhiteWave | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Foods | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dairy Group | |
|
Company | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
2,410,364 |
|
|
$ |
307,059 |
|
|
$ |
85,125 |
|
|
$ |
2,802,548 |
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(16,788 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,811 |
) |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
49,392 |
|
|
|
244,436 |
|
|
|
12,406 |
|
|
|
306,234 |
|
|
Currency changes and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,442,968 |
|
|
|
551,472 |
|
|
|
106,006 |
|
|
|
3,100,446 |
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(44,156 |
) |
|
|
(29,375 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(73,618 |
) |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
|
Currency changes and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,980 |
) |
|
|
(13,980 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
2,400,843 |
|
|
$ |
522,097 |
|
|
$ |
91,939 |
|
|
$ |
3,014,879 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments generally represent adjustments
of the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair
values of assets and liabilities purchased in recent
acquisitions. Included in the Dairy Group 2005 purchase
accounting adjustments is $35.6 million related to the
revision of tax attributes of assets from the Legacy Dean
acquisition. Deferred tax liabilities were reduced by a similar
amount. The adjustments to WhiteWave Foods Company in 2005
primarily represent the settlement of a contractual obligation
in an amount less than previously estimated in the preliminary
purchase price allocation. These adjustments have no impact on
the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of our
intangible assets other than goodwill as of December 31,
2005 and 2004 are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
| |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
| |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Trademarks
|
|
$ |
534,482 |
|
|
$ |
(6,649 |
) |
|
$ |
527,833 |
|
|
$ |
537,636 |
|
|
$ |
(6,649 |
) |
|
$ |
530,987 |
|
|
Intangible assets with finite lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Customer-related
|
|
|
87,774 |
|
|
|
(21,552 |
) |
|
|
66,222 |
|
|
|
85,167 |
|
|
|
(14,884 |
) |
|
|
70,283 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangibles
|
|
$ |
622,256 |
|
|
$ |
(28,201 |
) |
|
$ |
594,055 |
|
|
$ |
622,803 |
|
|
$ |
(21,533 |
) |
|
$ |
601,270 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization expense on intangible assets for the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $7.3 million,
$5.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively. Estimated
aggregate intangible asset amortization expense for the next
five years is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
7.2 million |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
7.2 million |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
7.0 million |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
6.9 million |
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6.8 million |
|
Our goodwill and intangible assets have resulted primarily from
acquisitions. Upon acquisition, the purchase price is first
allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities, including
trademarks and customer-related intangible assets, with any
remaining purchase price recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and
trademarks with indefinite lives are not amortized.
A trademark is recorded with an indefinite life if it has
sufficient market share and a history of strong sales and cash
flow performance that we expect to continue for the foreseeable
future. If these perpetual trademark criteria are not met, the
trademarks are amortized over their expected useful lives, which
range from five to 40 years. Determining the expected life
of a trademark is based on a number of factors including the
competitive environment, market share, trademark history and
anticipated future trademark support.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we conduct impairment
tests of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
annually in the fourth quarter or when circumstances arise that
indicate a possible impairment might exist. If the fair value of
an evaluated asset is less than its book value, the asset is
written down to fair value based on its discounted future cash
flows. Our 2005, 2004 and 2003 annual impairment tests of
goodwill indicated no impairments. Our 2005 and 2004 annual
impairment tests of intangibles with indefinite lives indicated
no impairment; our 2003 impairment test resulted in an
impairment of $2.3 million that was recorded for a
trademark that we were no longer using.
Amortizable intangible assets are only evaluated for impairment
upon a significant change in the operating environment. If an
evaluation of the undiscounted cash flows indicates impairment,
the asset is written down to its estimated fair value, which is
based on discounted future cash flows.
|
|
| 7. |
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
554,276 |
|
|
$ |
545,177 |
|
|
Payroll and benefits
|
|
|
149,498 |
|
|
|
113,509 |
|
|
Health insurance, workers compensation and other insurance
costs
|
|
|
85,250 |
|
|
|
59,465 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
194,781 |
|
|
|
151,012 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
983,805 |
|
|
$ |
869,163 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the 2005, 2004 and 2003 provisions
for income taxes.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004(2) | |
|
2003(3) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
109,883 |
|
|
$ |
5,505 |
|
|
$ |
26,153 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
14,216 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
11,763 |
|
|
Foreign and other
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
39,407 |
|
|
|
138,040 |
|
|
|
131,242 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
166,423 |
|
|
$ |
149,710 |
|
|
$ |
173,559 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Excludes $56.4 million income tax expense related to
discontinued operations and $900,000 income tax benefit related
to cumulative effect of accounting change. |
| |
| (2) |
Excludes $27.3 million income tax expense related to
discontinued operations. |
| |
| (3) |
Excludes $44.3 million income tax expense related to
discontinued operations. |
The following is a reconciliation of income taxes computed at
the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the income taxes
reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Tax expense at statutory rates
|
|
$ |
153,614 |
|
|
$ |
136,106 |
|
|
$ |
157,186 |
|
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
11,228 |
|
|
|
9,681 |
|
|
|
10,776 |
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
7,493 |
|
|
Nondeductible compensation
|
|
|
4,603 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
Favorable tax settlement
|
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
(2,493 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
166,423 |
|
|
$ |
149,710 |
|
|
$ |
173,559 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to deferred
income tax assets and liabilities were:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$ |
11,528 |
|
|
$ |
14,320 |
|
| |
Asset valuation reserves
|
|
|
11,121 |
|
|
|
13,581 |
|
| |
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
182,715 |
|
|
|
173,948 |
|
| |
State and foreign tax credits
|
|
|
15,193 |
|
|
|
9,379 |
|
| |
Interest rate hedges
|
|
|
(8,333 |
) |
|
|
2,498 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
212,224 |
|
|
|
213,726 |
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(516,243 |
) |
|
|
(511,069 |
) |
| |
Basis differences in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(25,821 |
) |
|
|
(23,809 |
) |
| |
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(14,280 |
) |
|
|
(14,765 |
) |
| |
Other
|
|
|
(5,351 |
) |
|
|
(4,544 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(561,695 |
) |
|
|
(554,187 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net deferred income tax liability
|
|
$ |
(349,471 |
) |
|
$ |
(340,461 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
These net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are
classified in our consolidated balance sheets as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
137,776 |
|
|
$ |
143,079 |
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(487,247 |
) |
|
|
(483,540 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
(349,471 |
) |
|
$ |
(340,461 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, we had approximately
$4.7 million of federal tax credits available for carryover
to future years. The credits are subject to certain limitations
and will expire beginning in 2010.
A valuation allowance of $14.3 million has been established
because we believe it is more likely than not that all of the
deferred tax assets relating to state net operating loss and
credit carryforwards, foreign tax credit carryforwards and
capital loss carryforwards will not be realized prior to the
date they are scheduled to expire.
F-19
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
| |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Rate | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Rate | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
$ |
2,258,600 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
% |
|
$ |
2,031,100 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
Subsidiary debt obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Senior notes
|
|
|
568,493 |
|
|
|
6.625-8.15 |
|
|
|
664,696 |
|
|
|
6.625-8.15 |
|
| |
Receivables-backed credit facility
|
|
|
548,400 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
| |
Other lines of credit
|
|
|
40,913 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
30,750 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
| |
Capital lease obligations and other
|
|
|
20,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
|
3,436,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,251,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(108,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total long-term portion
|
|
$ |
3,328,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,110,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The scheduled maturities of long-term debt, at December 31,
2005, were as follows (in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
108,327 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
479,020 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
981,939 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,747,846 |
|
|
2010
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
150,701 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,468,426 |
|
| |
Less discounts
|
|
|
(31,591 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total outstanding debt
|
|
$ |
3,436,835 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility Our senior credit
facility provides for a $1.5 billion revolving credit
facility and a $1.5 billion term loan. At December 31,
2005, there were outstanding term loan borrowings of
$1.5 billion under the senior credit facility, and
$758.6 million outstanding under the revolving line of
credit. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of
$112.1 million were issued but undrawn. At
December 31, 2005, approximately $629.3 million was
available for future borrowings under the revolving credit
facility, subject to satisfaction of certain ordinary course
conditions contained in the credit agreement.
In May 2005, we amended our senior credit facility to modify the
interest rate on the revolving credit facility and term loan.
With the amendment, both the revolving credit facility and term
loan bear interest, at our election, at the base rate plus a
margin that varies from zero to 25 basis points depending
on our credit ratings (as issued by Standard &
Poors and Moodys), or LIBOR plus a margin that
varies from 50 to 150 basis points, depending on our credit
ratings (as issued by Standard & Poors and
Moodys). Prior to the amendment, the base rate margin was
zero to 62.5 basis points and the LIBOR margin varied from
75 to 187.5 basis points based on our credit ratings. The
blended interest rate in effect on borrowings under the senior
credit facility, including the applicable interest rate margin,
was 5.16% at December 31, 2005. However, we had interest
rate swap agreements in place that hedged $1.625 billion of
our borrowings under the senior credit facility at an average
rate of 4.5%, plus the applicable interest rate margin. Interest
is payable quarterly or at the end of the applicable interest
period.
F-20
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Principal payments are required on the term loan as follows:
|
|
|
| |
|
$56.25 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2006 through September 30, 2008; |
| |
| |
|
$262.5 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2008 through June 30, 2009; and |
| |
| |
|
A final payment of $262.5 million on the maturity date of
August 13, 2009. |
No principal payments are due on the $1.5 billion revolving
credit facility until maturity on August 13, 2009.
The credit agreement also requires mandatory principal
prepayments upon the occurrence of certain asset dispositions or
recovery events.
In consideration for the revolving commitment, we pay a
quarterly commitment fee on unused amounts of the revolving
credit facility that ranges from 12.5 to 30 basis points,
depending on our credit ratings (as issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys).
The senior credit facility contains various financial and other
restrictive covenants and requires that we maintain certain
financial ratios, including a leverage and interest coverage
ratio. On November 18, 2005, we amended our senior credit
facility to change the maximum leverage ratio to 4.35 to 1.00
through March 31, 2007 and 4.00 to 1.00 thereafter. We are
currently in compliance with all covenants contained in our
credit agreement.
Our credit agreement permits us to complete acquisitions that
meet the following conditions without obtaining prior approval:
(1) the acquired company is involved in the manufacture,
processing and distribution of food or packaging products or any
other line of business in which we are currently engaged,
(2) the net cash purchase price is not greater than
$500 million, (3) we acquire at least 51% of the
acquired entity, (4) the transaction is approved by the
Board of Directors or shareholders, as appropriate, of the
target and (5) after giving effect to such acquisition on a
pro-forma basis, we are in compliance with all financial
covenants. All other acquisitions must be approved in advance by
the required lenders.
The senior credit facility also contains limitations on liens,
investments and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and
prohibits certain dispositions of property and restricts certain
payments, including dividends. The senior credit facility is
secured by liens on substantially all of our domestic assets
including the assets of our subsidiaries, but excluding the
capital stock of the former Legacy Deans subsidiaries, and
the real property owned by Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries.
The credit agreement contains standard default triggers,
including without limitation: failure to maintain compliance
with the financial and other covenants contained in the credit
agreement, default on certain of our other debt, a change in
control and certain other material adverse changes in our
business. The credit agreement does not contain any default
triggers based on our credit rating.
Senior Notes Legacy Dean had certain senior
notes outstanding at the time of the acquisition. One note
($100 million face value at 6.75% interest) matured and was
repaid in June 2005. The outstanding notes carry the following
interest rates and maturities:
|
|
|
| |
|
$250.2 million ($250 million face value), at 8.15%
interest, maturing in 2007; |
| |
| |
|
$190.2 million ($200 million face value), at 6.625%
interest, maturing in 2009; and |
| |
| |
|
$128.1 million ($150 million face value), at 6.9%
interest, maturing in 2017. |
The related indentures do not contain financial covenants but
they do contain certain restrictions including a prohibition
against Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries granting liens on
certain of their real property interests and a prohibition
against Legacy Dean granting liens on the stock of its
subsidiaries.
F-21
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Receivables-Backed Credit Facility We have
entered into a $600 million receivables securitization
facility pursuant to which certain of our subsidiaries sell
their accounts receivable to three wholly-owned special purpose
entities intended to be bankruptcy-remote. The special purpose
entities then transfer the receivables to third party
asset-backed commercial paper conduits sponsored by major
financial institutions. The assets and liabilities of these
three special purpose entities are fully reflected on our
balance sheet, and the securitization is treated as a borrowing
for accounting purposes. During 2005, we had net borrowings of
$48.4 million on this facility leaving an outstanding
balance of $548.4 million at December 31, 2005. The
receivables-backed credit facility bears interest at a variable
rate based on the commercial paper yield as defined in the
agreement. The average interest rate on this facility was 4.6%
at December 31, 2005. Our ability to re-borrow under this
facility is subject to a standard borrowing base
formula. The receivables-backed facility was fully funded at
December 31, 2005.
Other Lines of Credit Leche Celta, our
Spanish subsidiary, has certain lines of credit separate from
the senior credit facility described above. At December 31,
2005, $40.9 million was outstanding under these lines of
credit at an average interest rate of 3.0%.
Capital Lease Obligations and Other Capital
lease obligations and other subsidiary debt includes various
promissory notes for the purchase of property, plant and
equipment and capital lease obligations. The various promissory
notes payable provide for interest at varying rates and are
payable in monthly installments of principal and interest until
maturity, when the remaining principal balances are due. Capital
lease obligations represent machinery and equipment financing
obligations, which are payable in monthly installments of
principal and interest and are collateralized by the related
assets financed.
Interest Rate Agreements We have interest
rate swap agreements in place that have been designated as cash
flow hedges against variable interest rate exposure on a portion
of our debt, with the objective of minimizing our interest rate
risk and stabilizing cash flows. These swap agreements limit or
fix the LIBOR interest rates on our variable rate debt at the
interest rates noted below until the indicated expiration dates
of these interest rate swap agreements.
The following table summarizes our various interest rate
agreements in effect as of December 31, 2005:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
3.65% to 6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
4.81% to 4.84%
|
|
|
December 2007 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
4.07% to 4.27%
|
|
|
December 2010 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
The following table summarizes our various interest rate
agreements in effect as of December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
5.20% to 6.74%
|
|
|
December 2005 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
3.65% to 6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
These swaps are required to be recorded as an asset or liability
on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with an offset
to other comprehensive income to the extent the hedge is
effective. Derivative gains and losses included in other
comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings as the
underlying transaction occurs. Any ineffectiveness in our hedges
is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense.
F-22
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, our derivative asset and
liability balances were:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Current derivative asset
|
|
$ |
5,877 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Long-term derivative asset
|
|
|
10,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total derivative asset
|
|
$ |
15,905 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative liability
|
|
$ |
(1,926 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,993 |
) |
|
Long-term derivative liability
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(2,069 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total derivative liability
|
|
$ |
(2,326 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,062 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no hedge ineffectiveness for the years ended 2005,
2004 and 2003. Approximately $8.5 million,
$20.7 million and $25.6 million of losses (net of tax)
were reclassified to interest expense from other comprehensive
income during the years ended 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
We estimate that approximately $2.5 million of net
derivative gains (net of tax) included in other comprehensive
income will be reclassified into earnings within the next
12 months. These gains will decrease the interest expense
recorded on our variable rate debt.
We are exposed to market risk under these arrangements due to
the possibility of interest rates on the credit facilities
falling below the rates on our interest rate swap agreements.
Credit risk under these arrangements is remote because the
counterparties to our interest rate swap agreements are major
financial institutions.
Guarantor Information In December 2005, we
filed an immediately effective shelf registration statement
pursuant to which we registered debt securities that we may
issue in the future. If and when the debt securities are issued,
they will be unsecured obligations and will be fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by all of our wholly-owned
U.S. subsidiaries other than our receivables securitization
subsidiaries.
F-23
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following condensed consolidating financial statements
present the financial position, results of operations and cash
flows of the subsidiaries which will enter into a guarantee of
such debt, and separately the combined results of the
subsidiaries that will not be a party to the guarantees. The
non-guarantor subsidiaries reflect our foreign subsidiary
operations in addition to our three receivables securitization
subsidiaries. We do not allocate interest expense from the
receivables-based facility to the three receivables
securitization subsidiaries. Therefore, the interest costs
related to this facility are reflected within the guarantor
financial statements.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Parent and | |
|
Non- | |
|
|
| |
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantor | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
| |
|
Entities | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
18,927 |
|
|
$ |
6,193 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,120 |
|
| |
Receivables, net
|
|
|
41,996 |
|
|
|
825,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
867,398 |
|
| |
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
543,766 |
|
|
|
371,462 |
|
|
|
(915,228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Other current assets
|
|
|
558,080 |
|
|
|
26,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,450 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,162,769 |
|
|
|
1,229,427 |
|
|
|
(915,228 |
) |
|
|
1,476,968 |
|
| |
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,776,801 |
|
|
|
97,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874,486 |
|
| |
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,922,940 |
|
|
|
91,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,014,879 |
|
| |
Indentifiable intangible and other assets
|
|
|
648,222 |
|
|
|
36,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684,551 |
|
| |
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
237,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,747,764 |
|
|
$ |
1,455,380 |
|
|
$ |
(1,152,260 |
) |
|
$ |
7,050,884 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
| |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
925,666 |
|
|
$ |
57,809 |
|
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
983,805 |
|
| |
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
34,409 |
|
|
|
10,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,282 |
|
| |
Intercompany notes
|
|
|
371,462 |
|
|
|
544,096 |
|
|
|
(915,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
65,326 |
|
|
|
42,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,243 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,396,863 |
|
|
|
655,695 |
|
|
|
(915,228 |
) |
|
|
1,137,330 |
|
| |
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,773,122 |
|
|
|
555,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,328,592 |
|
| |
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
705,700 |
|
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712,883 |
|
| |
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,872,079 |
|
|
|
237,032 |
|
|
|
(237,032 |
) |
|
|
1,872,079 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
6,747,764 |
|
|
$ |
1,455,380 |
|
|
$ |
(1,152,260 |
) |
|
$ |
7,050,884 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2004 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Parent and | |
|
Non- | |
|
|
| |
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantor | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
| |
|
Entities | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
24,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,907 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,407 |
|
| |
Receivables, net
|
|
|
43,564 |
|
|
|
785,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828,754 |
|
| |
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
473,007 |
|
|
|
227,045 |
|
|
|
(700,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Other current assets
|
|
|
560,703 |
|
|
|
20,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,921 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,101,774 |
|
|
|
1,035,360 |
|
|
|
(700,052 |
) |
|
|
1,437,082 |
|
| |
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,715,378 |
|
|
|
97,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,813,284 |
|
| |
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,994,440 |
|
|
|
106,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100,446 |
|
| |
Indentifiable intangible and other assets
|
|
|
642,049 |
|
|
|
30,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,852 |
|
| |
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
190,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
732,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732,704 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,376,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,270,075 |
|
|
$ |
(890,600 |
) |
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
802,625 |
|
|
$ |
70,448 |
|
|
$ |
(3,910 |
) |
|
$ |
869,163 |
|
| |
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
29,882 |
|
|
|
10,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
| |
Intercompany notes
|
|
|
223,134 |
|
|
|
473,008 |
|
|
|
(696,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
110,235 |
|
|
|
30,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,012 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,165,876 |
|
|
|
584,351 |
|
|
|
(700,052 |
) |
|
|
1,050,175 |
|
| |
Long-term debt
|
|
|
2,626,017 |
|
|
|
484,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,110,716 |
|
| |
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
921,401 |
|
|
|
10,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
931,878 |
|
| |
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,663,599 |
|
|
|
190,548 |
|
|
|
(190,548 |
) |
|
|
2,663,599 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
7,376,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,270,075 |
|
|
$ |
(890,600 |
) |
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income for | |
| |
|
the Year Ended December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Parent and | |
|
|
| |
|
Guarantor | |
|
Non-Guarantor | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
| |
|
Entities | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
10,168,884 |
|
|
$ |
336,676 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,505,560 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
7,627,213 |
|
|
|
292,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,919,252 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,541,671 |
|
|
|
44,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,586,308 |
|
| |
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,535,892 |
|
|
|
25,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,561,688 |
|
| |
Other operating expense, net
|
|
|
403,042 |
|
|
|
14,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,529 |
|
| |
Interest expense
|
|
|
163,117 |
|
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,984 |
|
| |
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(789 |
) |
| |
Income from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
440,295 |
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
438,896 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
167,822 |
|
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,423 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
272,473 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
272,473 |
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
38,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,763 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,847 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative change of accounting, net of tax
|
|
|
329,083 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
329,083 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,552 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
327,531 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
(405 |
) |
|
$ |
327,531 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income for | |
| |
|
the Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Parent and | |
|
|
| |
|
Guarantor | |
|
Non-Guarantor | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
| |
|
Entities | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
9,712,991 |
|
|
$ |
323,286 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,036,277 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
7,361,805 |
|
|
|
279,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,641,368 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,351,186 |
|
|
|
43,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,394,909 |
|
| |
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,427,217 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450,480 |
|
| |
Other operating expense, net
|
|
|
346,562 |
|
|
|
10,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,028 |
|
| |
Interest expense
|
|
|
194,642 |
|
|
|
4,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,900 |
|
| |
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(370 |
) |
| |
Income from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(4,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
386,577 |
|
|
|
6,553 |
|
|
|
(4,259 |
) |
|
|
388,871 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
147,416 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,710 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
239,161 |
|
|
|
4,259 |
|
|
|
(4,259 |
) |
|
|
239,161 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
46,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,213 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
4,259 |
|
|
$ |
(4,259 |
) |
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income for | |
| |
|
the Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Parent and | |
|
|
| |
|
Guarantor | |
|
Non-Guarantor | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
| |
|
Entities | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,132,588 |
|
|
$ |
258,397 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,390,985 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
5,998,827 |
|
|
|
215,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,214,729 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,133,761 |
|
|
|
42,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,176,256 |
|
| |
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,272,486 |
|
|
|
18,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,290,728 |
|
| |
Other operating expense, net
|
|
|
244,219 |
|
|
|
6,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,095 |
|
| |
Interest expense
|
|
|
184,223 |
|
|
|
3,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,109 |
|
| |
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(2,208 |
) |
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,774 |
) |
| |
Income from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(9,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
444,073 |
|
|
|
14,057 |
|
|
|
(9,032 |
) |
|
|
449,098 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
168,534 |
|
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,559 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
275,539 |
|
|
|
9,032 |
|
|
|
(9,032 |
) |
|
|
275,539 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
80,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,164 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
9,032 |
|
|
$ |
(9,032 |
) |
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash | |
| |
|
Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2005 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Parent and | |
|
Non- | |
|
|
| |
|
Guarantor | |
|
Guarantor | |
|
Consolidated | |
| |
|
Entities | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Totals | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
626,077 |
|
|
$ |
(66,417 |
) |
|
$ |
559,660 |
|
| |
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(287,129 |
) |
|
|
(19,708 |
) |
|
|
(306,837 |
) |
| |
Cash outflows for acquisitions and investments
|
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(1,784 |
) |
| |
Net proceeds from divestitures
|
|
|
189,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,862 |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(98,162 |
) |
|
|
(19,558 |
) |
|
|
(117,720 |
) |
| |
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
223,783 |
|
|
|
66,769 |
|
|
|
290,552 |
|
| |
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(114,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114,837 |
) |
| |
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses
|
|
|
73,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,062 |
|
| |
Redemption of common stock
|
|
|
(699,878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(699,878 |
) |
| |
Other
|
|
|
6,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,874 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(510,996 |
) |
|
|
66,769 |
|
|
|
(444,227 |
) |
|
Net change in intercompany balances
|
|
|
(22,492 |
) |
|
|
22,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(5,573 |
) |
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
(2,287 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
27,407 |
|
|