The patent trial between Samsung and Apple didn’t end this summer. A jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple more than $1 billion for infringing on a handful of its mobile patents, but the judge is still sorting things out: late Tuesday, Judge Lucy Koh decided against a retrial and did not change Apple’s jury award.What happened
- Apple’s not getting more than $1 billion. Disagreeing with the jury, Koh found that Samsung’s infringement of Apple’s mobile patents was “not willful,” The Verge reported. That’s a key distinction because if she had, then the jury-calculated $1.049 billion award could have been tripled.
- Several Apple design patents were not ruled invalid. Samsung had quibbled over some tap-to-zoom patents Apple claimed, but the judge found in favor of Apple. (via AppleInsider)
- There will be no re-do of the trial. Samsung believed that how the the trial was handled was unfair and wanted a retrial. Ars Technica explains why Judge Koh disagreed.
Still, we’re not done with the Apple-Samsung patent spat. Next up, both sides — each of which has its own complaints about the verdict and how the trial was handled — can begin filing appeals.
Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.
- The state of cross-platform media measurement
- How emerging technologies will influence collaboration
- CES 2012: a recap and analysis
Nasdaq quotes delayed at least 15 minutes, all others at least 20 minutes.
Markets are closed on certain holidays. Stock Market Holiday List
By accessing this page, you agree to the following
Press Release Service provided by PRConnect.
Stock quotes supplied by Telekurs USA
Postage Rates Bots go here