|
A Free Press |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MEDIA MATTERS 'Bogus' story aired by CNN TV journalist does report on evolution bill, mischaracterizes what legislation would do Posted: April 07, 2004 1:00 am Eastern © 2009 WorldNetDaily.com
CNN is being urged to run a correction after it aired a story about a piece of evolution-related legislation – a story that was full of inaccuracies. The report, which was aired Sunday during "CNN Sunday Morning," said the state of Missouri is considering legislation reporter Denise Belgrave claimed "would fire teachers who refused to teach alternatives to evolution." The provision she mentioned, however, is no longer a part of the bill. "Its whole story about legislation to fire teachers was bogus," said Dr. John West, associate director of the Center for Science and Culture at Discovery Institute, in a statement. "Unfortunately, CNN ran its story without checking the facts first. There is no such legislation currently under consideration in Missouri, let alone any other states as CNN reported." West says CNN interviewed him for the story, but did not mention the Missouri legislation. In the broadcast story, Belgrave urged viewers: "Imagine a law that would fire teachers who refused to teach alternatives to evolution theory, alternatives that have not yet been widely accepted by the scientific community. That's what Missouri's considering, but Missouri isn't alone." According to Discovery Institute, viewers were then shown a map of the United States with nine states highlighted as places where measures similar to Missouri's were being considered. The main alternative to evolution Belgrave identified was "intelligent design," which proposes that some features of the natural world are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. A bill that would have penalized teachers for not teaching an evolution alternative was introduced in Missouri in January, but the bill was later revised to eliminate the penalty on teachers. Furthermore, the revised bill is no longer under active consideration by the Missouri Legislature. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Wayne Cooper, confirmed to Discovery Institute on Monday that he plans to let the bill die during the current session without a vote. According to Rep. Cooper, CNN never contacted him about the current status of his bill. CNN's contention that nine other states are considering legislation similar to Missouri's is also under question. "None of the nine states identified by CNN are considering legislation that would punish teachers for failing to teach alternatives to evolution," said West. "Not one. "This sort of shoddy journalism is inexcusable. CNN manufactured a controversy that doesn't in fact exist. There is no movement in America to fire teachers who won't teach 'alternatives to evolution.' The teachers who are really facing threats to their academic freedom today are those who want to present scientific criticisms of evolutionary theory." CNN issued a statement standing by its story and saying it is West's contentions that are "without merit." The network said the version of Cooper's bill linked from his website has the teacher-firing provision in it. The copy of the bill online is labeled "introduced," suggesting it is the original version before any changes were made. "CNN's report did not say other states were all considering legislation," the statement said, "rather it stated 'local school boards like this one are voting on how evolution should or should not be taught in public schools. Nine states are now grappling with the debate through legislation or local school boards, with others like to join the ranks soon.'" Continued the statement: "Mr. West was fully aware from his half-hour long telephone conversation with the reporter that CNN's story would focus on this debate. Any claim otherwise is as false as his other charges against this network. CNN has no agenda on this or any other story we report and any suggestion to the contrary is just plain wrong." Related story: Taxpayers fund site pushing religious Darwinism SPECIAL OFFER: Until 10 p.m. Pacific tonight, get the authoritative yet reader-friendly blockbuster on the very latest scientific evidence against evolution – namely, "The Case Against Darwin" – FREE – when you subscribe, renew or give a gift subscription to WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||