WND REPORTED IN JANUARY:
The foundations for health-care rationing and even so-called death panels may have already been quietly laid in largely unreported sections of President Obama’s health-care legislation, WND has found.
There is also concern for preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity and so-called life preferences.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare, called for the establishment of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The new institute’s purpose is to carry out “comparative clinical effectiveness research,” which is defined in the law as evaluating and comparing “health outcomes” and “clinical effectiveness, risks and benefits” of two or more medical treatments or services.
The purpose of the research is purportedly for the government to determine which treatments work best so that money is not spent on less effective treatments.
Such research was already previously allotted $1.1 billion in Obama’s 2009 “stimulus” package. That legislation first created a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Obamacare now allows for about $3.8 billion in additional funding for effectiveness research, with the establishment of the new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The institute is to be governed by a “board” to assist in identifying research priorities and establishing the research project agenda.
Also weighing in will be an “expert advisory panel” of practicing and research clinicians, patients and experts in scientific and health services research and health services delivery.
A section of Obamacare makes clear the secretary of health and human services may not use research data from the new institute in a manner that treats the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill individual as lower in value than that of an individual who is younger, non-disabled or not terminally ill.
However, the dictate comes with a qualifier some many find concerning.
Obamacare contains largely unreported text that allows the health secretary to limit any “alternative treatments” of the elderly, disabled or terminally ill if such treatments are not recommended by the new research institute.
Reads that qualifier:
Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative treatments in extending an individual’s life due to the individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness.
Paragraph (1) refers to the section that bars the health secretary from valuing the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill patient as lower than that of the younger or nondisabled patient.
The qualifier leaves the health secretary with the power to use government-provided research data to determine whether “alternative treatments” are effective in extending the life of the elderly, disables, or terminally ill.
Read more: www.wnd.com
Government funded study outlining a 'mortality test' for patients ...more
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews spiritual adviser, minister Shawn Bolz
Exclusive: David Rives warns about evolutionists sowing dissent among Bible-believing Christians
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us how we distinguish between God of the Bible and other gods
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews minister Dr. Billye Brim
Exclusive: David Rives reminds us of Creator's incredible design
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us Jesus kept the Sabbath, we should too
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews authors, cancer survivors Gary, Rosey Brausen
Why did the Lord command the ancient Hebrews to wipe out entire people groups?
Exclusive: David Rives asks if we can be Christian while believing in 'terrible lizards'
Exclusive: Richard Rives reviews how 2 were blended in early times
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, minister James Goll
Exclusive: David Rives reminds us complexity of molecular language bears fingerprint of our Creator
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns aspects can still be found in aspects of contemporary Christianity
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist, minister, author David Hernandez
Joel Richardson on the critical differences between two wars
Exclusive: David Rives explains natural selection cannot create brand-new generic material
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against pastors who know truth but refuse to present it
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist Perry Stone
Exclusive: David Rives poses thorny dilemma of moral consciousness and what makes humans different
Exclusive: Richard Rives urges caution about adopting aspects of pagan worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Christian cardiologist Dr. Chauncey Crandall
Joel Richardson explains why Jesus clearly was teaching eternal conscious torment for wicked
Exclusive: David Rives points out influences behind aesthetically pleasing, practical creations
Exclusive: Richard Rives questions Roman leader's choice of god to worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor Ron Phillips
Exclusive: David Rives points out current holocaust no one will stop
Exclusive: Richard Rives recounts when pagan influences began infiltrating believers in Yeshua
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor, author Time Sheets
Why the traditional position is indeed the correct and biblical stance
Exclusive: David Rives notes biblical deluge key to understanding geological world