WND REPORTED IN JANUARY:
The foundations for health-care rationing and even so-called death panels may have already been quietly laid in largely unreported sections of President Obama’s health-care legislation, WND has found.
There is also concern for preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity and so-called life preferences.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare, called for the establishment of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The new institute’s purpose is to carry out “comparative clinical effectiveness research,” which is defined in the law as evaluating and comparing “health outcomes” and “clinical effectiveness, risks and benefits” of two or more medical treatments or services.
The purpose of the research is purportedly for the government to determine which treatments work best so that money is not spent on less effective treatments.
Such research was already previously allotted $1.1 billion in Obama’s 2009 “stimulus” package. That legislation first created a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Obamacare now allows for about $3.8 billion in additional funding for effectiveness research, with the establishment of the new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The institute is to be governed by a “board” to assist in identifying research priorities and establishing the research project agenda.
Also weighing in will be an “expert advisory panel” of practicing and research clinicians, patients and experts in scientific and health services research and health services delivery.
A section of Obamacare makes clear the secretary of health and human services may not use research data from the new institute in a manner that treats the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill individual as lower in value than that of an individual who is younger, non-disabled or not terminally ill.
However, the dictate comes with a qualifier some many find concerning.
Obamacare contains largely unreported text that allows the health secretary to limit any “alternative treatments” of the elderly, disabled or terminally ill if such treatments are not recommended by the new research institute.
Reads that qualifier:
Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative treatments in extending an individual’s life due to the individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness.
Paragraph (1) refers to the section that bars the health secretary from valuing the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill patient as lower than that of the younger or nondisabled patient.
The qualifier leaves the health secretary with the power to use government-provided research data to determine whether “alternative treatments” are effective in extending the life of the elderly, disables, or terminally ill.
Read more: www.wnd.com
Government funded study outlining a 'mortality test' for patients ...more
Exclusive: David Rives notes stars don't 'form,' they're 'revealed'
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns about 'abominable practices' of Easter
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews charismatic violist LaDonna Taylor
Exclusive: David Rives notes star formation not scientifically explainable without Deity
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns about satanic influences of pagan sun-worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, speaker, pastor Kynan Bridges
Majority view down through history pinpoints coming cataclysm
Exclusive: David Rives notes more geologists are realizing 'present is not key to the past'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews charismatic healer Becky Dvorak
Exclusive: David Rives shows how rocks point to global catastrophe that radically changed the earth
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us sin is still the transgression of the law
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist Steve Stewart
Exclusive: David Rives recounts history of what made atheism respectable
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against blending faith with pagan sun worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews trio of world-class prophets
Exclusive: David Rives notes difference between 'kind' and 'species'
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns us about redefining faith delivered to the saints
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor Steve Hannett
Exclusive: David Rives notes Darwin was right – partially
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us we are to be 'doers' of the Word, not just 'hearers'
Exclusive: Richard Rives highlights multiple attempts to lead us away from our Creator
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor Cleddie Keith
Joel Richardson, in video made just after failed coup, discusses leader of a revived kingdom
Exclusive: Richard Rives urges us not to 'swallow a camel' while 'straining at gnats'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews prophetic revivalist Jerame Nelson
Exclusive: David Rives notes how biological stasis occurs despite vastly changing environment
Exclusive: Richard Rives notes how Roman 'diversity' resulted in inclusion of pagan principles
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews apostolic minister Ryan LeStrange
Exclusive: David Rives illustrates blood-clotting 'cascade' as evidence for Creator's hand
Exclusive: Richard Rives points out we can keep God's laws because we are saved