WND REPORTED IN JANUARY:
The foundations for health-care rationing and even so-called death panels may have already been quietly laid in largely unreported sections of President Obama’s health-care legislation, WND has found.
There is also concern for preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity and so-called life preferences.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare, called for the establishment of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The new institute’s purpose is to carry out “comparative clinical effectiveness research,” which is defined in the law as evaluating and comparing “health outcomes” and “clinical effectiveness, risks and benefits” of two or more medical treatments or services.
The purpose of the research is purportedly for the government to determine which treatments work best so that money is not spent on less effective treatments.
Such research was already previously allotted $1.1 billion in Obama’s 2009 “stimulus” package. That legislation first created a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Obamacare now allows for about $3.8 billion in additional funding for effectiveness research, with the establishment of the new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The institute is to be governed by a “board” to assist in identifying research priorities and establishing the research project agenda.
Also weighing in will be an “expert advisory panel” of practicing and research clinicians, patients and experts in scientific and health services research and health services delivery.
A section of Obamacare makes clear the secretary of health and human services may not use research data from the new institute in a manner that treats the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill individual as lower in value than that of an individual who is younger, non-disabled or not terminally ill.
However, the dictate comes with a qualifier some many find concerning.
Obamacare contains largely unreported text that allows the health secretary to limit any “alternative treatments” of the elderly, disabled or terminally ill if such treatments are not recommended by the new research institute.
Reads that qualifier:
Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative treatments in extending an individual’s life due to the individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness.
Paragraph (1) refers to the section that bars the health secretary from valuing the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill patient as lower than that of the younger or nondisabled patient.
The qualifier leaves the health secretary with the power to use government-provided research data to determine whether “alternative treatments” are effective in extending the life of the elderly, disables, or terminally ill.
Read more: www.wnd.com
Government funded study outlining a 'mortality test' for patients ...more
Exclusive: David Rives notes Cambrian explosion casts doubt on entire evolutionary story
Exclusive: Richard Rives asks why Christian leaders won't admit the obvious
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews ministers Ken, Trudi Blount
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews powerful but anonymous medical minister
Exclusive: David Rives notes God's love of diversity in natural world
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Mark Virkler and daughter Charity
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews prophetic healing artist Theresa Dedmon
God's unfolding plans for Israel and His purposes
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against falling prey to definition of sin
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, teacher, minister Joan Hunter
Exclusive: David Rives offers testable hypotheses supported by data from Bible-believers
Exclusive: Richard Rives notes Ten Commandments were once placed in public buildings for a reason
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews educator, evangelist Donna Schambach
Exclusive: David Rives notes moon's distance can only be explained by young Earth
Exclusive: Richard Rives urges us to walk as Jesus walked
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, speaker John Bevere
Exclusive: David Rives notes natural selection can only work with information already in genome
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews prophetic rabbi Jonathan Cahn
Exclusive: David Rives notes random chance could never form something as complex as a working eye
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns us not to advance 'shameful traditions of men'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews charismatic revivalist Bill Johnson
What happens when ordinary believers minister to the world
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns about influence of non-biblical traditions on contemporary worship
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews apostolic minister Robert Henderson
Exclusive: David Rives notes unexpected finding in Earth's hardest natural substance
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds we can't be blessed when disregarding God's word
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Dr. Richard Booker
Joel Richardson explains latest frightening developments in Turkey
Exclusive: David Rives notes complex process could not have 'happened' through trial and error
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us not to succumb to 'author of confusion'