WND REPORTED IN JANUARY:
The foundations for health-care rationing and even so-called death panels may have already been quietly laid in largely unreported sections of President Obama’s health-care legislation, WND has found.
There is also concern for preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity and so-called life preferences.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare, called for the establishment of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The new institute’s purpose is to carry out “comparative clinical effectiveness research,” which is defined in the law as evaluating and comparing “health outcomes” and “clinical effectiveness, risks and benefits” of two or more medical treatments or services.
The purpose of the research is purportedly for the government to determine which treatments work best so that money is not spent on less effective treatments.
Such research was already previously allotted $1.1 billion in Obama’s 2009 “stimulus” package. That legislation first created a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Obamacare now allows for about $3.8 billion in additional funding for effectiveness research, with the establishment of the new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The institute is to be governed by a “board” to assist in identifying research priorities and establishing the research project agenda.
Also weighing in will be an “expert advisory panel” of practicing and research clinicians, patients and experts in scientific and health services research and health services delivery.
A section of Obamacare makes clear the secretary of health and human services may not use research data from the new institute in a manner that treats the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill individual as lower in value than that of an individual who is younger, non-disabled or not terminally ill.
However, the dictate comes with a qualifier some many find concerning.
Obamacare contains largely unreported text that allows the health secretary to limit any “alternative treatments” of the elderly, disabled or terminally ill if such treatments are not recommended by the new research institute.
Reads that qualifier:
Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative treatments in extending an individual’s life due to the individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness.
Paragraph (1) refers to the section that bars the health secretary from valuing the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill patient as lower than that of the younger or nondisabled patient.
The qualifier leaves the health secretary with the power to use government-provided research data to determine whether “alternative treatments” are effective in extending the life of the elderly, disables, or terminally ill.
Read more: www.wnd.com
Government funded study outlining a 'mortality test' for patients ...more
Exclusive: David Rives notes sense of smell incredible testimony to design of Creator
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds people what is truly fearful
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Adrian Beale and Adam Thompson
Exclusive: David Rives explains astounding structure's only possible explanation
Exclusive: Richard Rives pegs Protestant influences
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, apostolic leader, senior pastor Kynan Bridges
Exclusive: David Rives notes if you want to see better in the dark, don't look to evolution for answer
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds us of what sin really is
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews speaker, business, political strategist Lance Wallnau
Exclusive: David Rives notes 4th dimension applies directly to God
Exclusive: Richard Rives remembers Constantine's influence on making change
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews prophetic minister Shawn Bolz
Exclusive: David Rives notes laws of nature only work with a designed universe
Exclusive: Richard Rives notes dangers of deciding right and wrong for ourselves
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews evangelist Joan Gieson
Exclusive: David Rives notes evolutionists have no logical explanation for 2nd plant's opposite rotations
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, speaker Kevin Zadai
Exclusive: David Rives notes long-ages view fails to explain the evidence
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, speaker Dawna De Silva
Exclusive: David Rives notes space phenomenon not a problem in Biblical chronology
Exclusive: Richard Rives notes Jesus did not die so we may practice sin
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Mark Taylor, Mary Colbert
Exclusive: Richard Rives reminds believers God's commandments are not 'legalistic'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Jim Woodford
Exclusive: David Rives offers simple explanation for thorny question of stellar evolution
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns against 'walking mournfully before the Lord of Hosts'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Messianic rabbi, biblical scholar Jonathan Cahn
Exclusive: David Rives notes science can't explain 'game changer' presence of ancient soft tissue
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns our Creator's commandments are sure
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews author, pastor Steven Brooks