WND REPORTED IN JANUARY:
The foundations for health-care rationing and even so-called death panels may have already been quietly laid in largely unreported sections of President Obama’s health-care legislation, WND has found.
There is also concern for preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity and so-called life preferences.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare, called for the establishment of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The new institute’s purpose is to carry out “comparative clinical effectiveness research,” which is defined in the law as evaluating and comparing “health outcomes” and “clinical effectiveness, risks and benefits” of two or more medical treatments or services.
The purpose of the research is purportedly for the government to determine which treatments work best so that money is not spent on less effective treatments.
Such research was already previously allotted $1.1 billion in Obama’s 2009 “stimulus” package. That legislation first created a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Obamacare now allows for about $3.8 billion in additional funding for effectiveness research, with the establishment of the new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
The institute is to be governed by a “board” to assist in identifying research priorities and establishing the research project agenda.
Also weighing in will be an “expert advisory panel” of practicing and research clinicians, patients and experts in scientific and health services research and health services delivery.
A section of Obamacare makes clear the secretary of health and human services may not use research data from the new institute in a manner that treats the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill individual as lower in value than that of an individual who is younger, non-disabled or not terminally ill.
However, the dictate comes with a qualifier some many find concerning.
Obamacare contains largely unreported text that allows the health secretary to limit any “alternative treatments” of the elderly, disabled or terminally ill if such treatments are not recommended by the new research institute.
Reads that qualifier:
Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing the Secretary from using evidence or findings from such comparative clinical effectiveness research in determining coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under title XVIII based upon a comparison of the difference in the effectiveness of alternative treatments in extending an individual’s life due to the individual’s age, disability, or terminal illness.
Paragraph (1) refers to the section that bars the health secretary from valuing the life of an elderly, disabled or terminally ill patient as lower than that of the younger or nondisabled patient.
The qualifier leaves the health secretary with the power to use government-provided research data to determine whether “alternative treatments” are effective in extending the life of the elderly, disables, or terminally ill.
Read more: www.wnd.com
Government funded study outlining a 'mortality test' for patients ...more
Exclusive: David Rives reviews techniques, difficulties in capturing God's glorious universe
Exclusive: Richard Rives recounts how Constantine's compromise made it easy for pagans to embrace his version of Christianity
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews opera-turned-Gospel singer Brent Luck
Exclusive: David Rives recounts Robert Boyle's discoveries of God's 'manifold works'
Exclusive: Richard Rives warns about questioning reliability of Scripture when there is no compromise among those of other faiths
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews prophetic Rabbi Jonathan Cahn
Exclusive: Bradlee Dean highlights latest incident of Muslim curriculum on campus
Exclusive: David Rives examines chemistry, biology of bombadier beetle as evidence
Exclusive: Richard Rives recounts how for 100 years after Christ, believers observed Mosaic law
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews investigative authors Tom Horn, Cris Putnam
Exclusive: Bradlee Dean reveals importance of distinguishing between 2 forms of gov't
Exclusive: David Rives reminds us: 'He is God ... there is none else'
Exclusive: Richard Rives argues each are necessary for salvation
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews pastor Robby Dawkins
Exclusive: Bradlee Dean explains consequences of dishonoring Divine order
Exclusive: David Rives urges perspective: Fastest spacecraft would take 200,000 years to reach
Exclusive: Molotov Mitchell dumps his 7-year-old theme music
Exclusive: Richard Rives points out how both are foundational principles of biblical Christianity
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews minister and missionary David Herzog
Exclusive: D.J. Dolce figures if gaffe-man Joe is beating Hillary, she's through
Exclusive: Bradlee Dean wants politicians who 'contrive' conflicts to be first to fight
Exclusive: David Rives points out how Scripture predates Aristotle's early explanation of hydrologic cycle
Exclusive: Molotov Mitchell presents realities of Clinton scandal
Exclusive: Richard Rives references Thomas Paine's book questioning pagan influences in Christianity
Exclusive: D.J. Dolce has brainstorm for 'concealed-carry M&M holsters'
Exclusive: Sid Roth interviews Divinity Code's Adam Thompson and Adrian Beale
Exclusive: Bradlee Dean warns against 'overlooking judgment because of kindness'
Exclusive: David Rives illustrates scientific wisdom in Scripture
Exclusive: Molotov Mitchell reports on candidate's recent 'Twitter train wreck'
Exclusive: Laurie Cardoza-Moore reveals the parallels of African and Jewish history