Clinton’s secret war games

September 29, 1998

This is the first of a two-part series on the revelations of military
computer expert Curt Tomlin.

President Bill Clinton is playing war games on a top secret computer
to come up with a way to be an international hero, according to the man
who designed the system.

According to Rev. Curt Tomlin, a former member of the battle staff of
both presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, Clinton is a
desperate man who is like an animal trapped in a corner. He will do
anything to regain his credibility and deflect
criticism from his impending impeachment hearings, he says. He also is
driven
by his desire to create a positive legacy of his time in the White
House, according to various reports.

Clinton’s motivations are dangerous to the security of our nation,
according to Tomlin. It
was Tomlin who designed and perfected the Pentagon’s first war games
computer system, the top secret “Single Integrated Operating Procedure.”

The “SIOP” computer is a method of targeting a military attack and
evaluating the most likely response to that attack, according to Tomlin.
Highly classified intelligence information is gathered from all over the
world by the CIA and other sources, placed in the computer, and then
accessed by Clinton to play his own personal war games.

“The decisions he’s making right now are totally illogical and
irresponsible,” Tomlin told WorldNetDaily in an exclusive interview.
“Looking at the power and everything he’s got at his finger tips. That’s
a dangerous situation for a spastic individual.”

Tomlin has maintained silence about the top secret program for many
years. He has been called out of retirement three times and has served
in the Navy, Air Force, and Army for a combined total of just over 24
years. He has also been hired by government contractors to assist in
computer intelligence systems designed to improve security
for military computer systems.

“I could be sticking my neck on the chopping block for a number of
reasons,” said Tomlin of his decision to make his information public.
“Number one is, I’m still under some lifetime restrictions on security
clearances. For example two of the clearances I had above top secret was
ESI and category 7 and 9. That was three above that. Those are lifetime.
So I have to be a little bit careful about what I put in print. I think
people have to be aware of this, regardless of the consequences on my
end. I feel that I would be guilty of the military crime of negligence
of duty if I did not bring this to
somebody’s attention,” explained Tomlin.

Clinton had tried to become an international hero by destroying
hundreds of terrorists being trained by Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan
and a chemical weapons plant in Sudan. Those two missile attacks were
chosen through use of the SIOP computer to which Clinton has access,
according to Tomlin.

The computer predicted the result of the attacks would bring about
the death of hundreds of terrorist forces and eliminate a chemical
weapons factory. Someone intervened to change the results, according to
an intelligence source who spoke only on condition of anonymity.

Reports in European newspapers after the attacks by Clinton
corroborate what that source claimed. “There were no dead terrorists,
and the chemical weapons plant was an innocent pharmaceutical plant.
Instead of being a hero, Clinton is an international laughing stock. The
terrorists were tipped off and cleared the area. The real chemical
weapons plant was two miles away. It was a combination of bad
intelligence and purposeful intervention,” said the source.

Clinton has been searching the SIOP system ever since the failure in
an effort to find another opportunity to prove himself to the world and
become the international hero he envisions for his legacy, according to
the source. Tomlin agrees.

“There’s no choice. He’s either going to sink or try again. We can
look for some very unpleasant responses, depending on the target he
chooses,” says Tomlin.

When Clinton actually succeeds at inflicting damage to a group of
international terrorists, many experts believe there will be swift and
deadly retaliation. Americans are in danger of massive chemical and
biological attacks in major metropolitan areas, as well as similar
attacks on large military bases.

Tomlin says he is personally aware of unprotected water supplies to
domestic military bases that could provide terrorists an opportunity to
poison the drinking water used by most of the nation’s military.

“When you contaminate a water supply … that’s almost beyond my
comprehension,” he remarked. The open borders of the United States make
it a simple process for terrorists to come into the country and bring
their weapons of mass destruction with them without detection,” he says.
“They can come and go as they please with any kind of cargo. That
border is literally wide open, regardless of what INS tells you,” warned
Tomlin.

Tomlin believes there are many terrorist agents already located in
the United States waiting for orders to strike. Other sources have
independently confirmed that claim but were unwilling to be identified.

“There’s no doubt that the U.S. is currently in the greatest danger
of massive domestic attack from an external enemy than ever before in
our nation’s history,” agreed one intelligence source who is equally
concerned about Clinton pushing such terrorists to the point to massive
retaliation. “They just need an excuse,” he said.

“Of course, the president has available to him an awesome military
force that he can use to launch a first strike on any target in the
world,” explained Tomlin of the top secret system available to Clinton.
“One of the things I have been real concerned about
recently is the type of response that we can expect from these various
targets that the president can choose from. For example, if he chose to
hit target A, the computer system would come back and tell him what kind
of response he can expect. Will that response be in the nature of an
explosive response like blowing up an embassy? Will it be in the form of
a chemical or biological response, or a combination of the two? And it
will also tell him, will the response be a psychological or political
response, or a combination of any of these? In other words, the system
will come back and tell him exactly what he can expect the owners of
that target to do in retaliation,” explained Tomlin, the father of that
real-life computer war game.

“We got an awful lot of our information through CIA on site sources
where these various targets were located,” Tomlin says. “We could tell
you anything you wanted to know about that target. How thick the walls
were, if it were a structure, how far under ground it goes. How many
megatons of explosives it would take to wipe it out totally, or give you
50 percent destruction, or 75 percent destruction. We could just tell
you anything you wanted to know about that target.”

The highly advanced computer system as well as the automated launch
and attack systems enable Clinton to initiate an attack without the
knowledge of very many other individuals. Such decisions could be made
by Clinton alone, or with just a few political advisers. Military and
security advisers could be left in the dark.

“That’s what bothers me today,” says Tomlin. “Given the fact that the
man in the White House now has his finger on the trigger, and he can
launch those forces which still consist of atomic warheads on any
intercontinental ballistic missile. He can create a situation that could
be very detrimental to this country. There are certain things that I’m
really concerned about at this point in time concerning the highly
probable responses that the president can expect as the result of
striking certain targets.”

With SIOP, Clinton can sit at his private computer and play war games
until he finds the situation he likes best. He can literally type in
various attacks around the world and the SIOP computer will tell him
what will be the likely results of such an attack. With the push of a
button he can turn the computer simulation he likes best into reality.

“The ones I am concerned about now is the possibility of a chemical
or biological response to a specific strike that he would initiate,”
said Tomlin of his fear. “Simply because an explosive response is
limited in scope. It’s a token. It’s a warning. But when you drop a very
small amount of biological or chemical agents into the water supply of a
large city of Dallas or Houston, my friend, we have a problem in that
area. You can bring these agents through customs on our southern border
almost undetected. There’s just very little possibility of these things
being detected coming through Customs or just walking across the border
in a deserted area.”

Tomlin created the SIOP computer back in 1963 when he served on the
Kennedy battle staff. He continued to serve on the Johnson battle staff
as well. Since then he has helped the military work on numerous top
secret defense projects and information systems.

Tomlin did his work in the top secret underground “site R,” as well
as in the Pentagon war room. His work was considered so critical that he
had a 24-hour armed Marine guard watching over him.

Although Tomlin is now retired, he still lives by Fort Hood in Texas
and has many neighbors who are current and former military. He claims
there are many who are getting out of the service because of Clinton.

“Unfortunately,” says Tomlin, “that’s the sentiment that is running
rampant among military people in this area. If you cannot trust your
leader, then we have a problem. This man cannot be trusted. They are
deserting (their careers). I’m talking about our combat
experienced veterans. They’re giving up 18 years, 17 years and so forth
and getting out because they can no longer trust their leader. They
don’t want to be a part of what he might create.”

Tomlin expects Clinton to launch an attack very soon that will bring
devastating domestic retaliation to the U.S.

“If I were still on active duty, either as an enlisted man or as a
commissioned officer, knowing what I know now, looking at all of the
information I have available to me, I would have no choice but to resign
my commission or terminate my enlistment simply because there is no way
that I could now trust my commander in chief,” said
Tomlin.