Last week WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah keenly and completely
identified the true political machinations of the modern political
elite. Fascism,
he says, is the problem here, though I would contend that some of our
“elite” — Ted Turner of CNN, for example — defer to other political
leanings like socialism.
The leftist/fascists would most certainly deny this — they love to
paint the far right as fascists in the image of Hitler, Mussolini and
others. They’re wrong — as usual — but that’s not relevant anymore.
Millions of Americans know that millions of other Americans hate them,
don’t trust them, revile them, demonize them and chastise them because
of what the political left has portrayed them as.
In essence, the left’s ultimate goal of “divide and conquer” has been
completely successful, in my view, and I wonder now if America’s right
and left have reached the point where our differences are
irreconcilable. I say “the right” and “the left” because “the middle”
— ostensibly those Americans who really don’t have an opinion about
anything — are immaterial and will follow success wherever it leads
them. At this point, most in that group take their cue from the left
because that group has so completely taken over government, media and
entertainment.
All kinds of generalized instances of our irreconcilable differences
abound today, but here are some of the most divisive issues and why I
believe they are incompatible with the survival of this nation as a
distinct world power:
- Tobacco — There is no doubt that cigarettes, chewing
tobacco and cigars are unhealthy, but there is also no doubt that they
are legal products. There is, however, a doubt that much vaunted
and so-called “second hand smoke” is unhealthy — at least to the point
the left politicizes, according to a 1998 study done by a mechanism of
the left, the World Health Organization. But these latter truths are
ignored — intentionally — in order to foster legitimacy for the left’s
attempt to demonize this product out of pure, raw greed. It’s not
enough for the left to be satisfied with “sin taxing” tobacco double and
triple what other products are taxed — they feel justified in extorting
the tobacco companies out of billions of dollars to pay for government
“health care” they themselves established, and that taxpayers
already subsidize with other taxes. Hypocritically, though, they
refuse to hold other products to the same standards — automobiles,
alcohol, backyard pools — because they know the popularity of these
other products outweighs their ability to demonize them. The right
says, essentially, “smoke if you want to, but don’t hold companies
making legal products responsible if you do.” - Guns — Much in the same way the tobacco industry has been
demonized, the left has had modest success in transforming a citizen’s
right to be armed into an act fraught with criminal intent and practiced
only by “militia nuts and crazies.” Yet they support, endorse and
practice a form of “assault” — at least on the truth — when it comes
to the First Amendment, even going so far as to suggest children in
school have every right to “speak” freely, even disruptively. Since the
tobacco lie worked so well, the left now seeks to “punish” the gun
industry, not because it manufactures an inherently deadly product, but
because that product — which can be used in a deadly manner — is
misused by a few idiots. At the same time, the left’s “rule of law”
philosophy isn’t being practiced, as the 45 percent drop in FBI’s gun
prosecution caseload since Clinton came into office demonstrates. The
right, on the other hand, correctly interprets the Second Amendment as
not pertaining merely to “duck hunting” and avidly defends this right as
a right against the very tyranny being imposed by the left. Furthermore,
the right also correctly interprets the Second Amendment as every bit
worth protecting as the First Amendment — and all others enumerated in
the Constitution. - Education — As demonstrated here, explained
here
and advocated here, there
are already deep and irreconcilable differences between the left’s
complete adoption of control over public education and the right’s
full-blown rebellion of those so-called “standards.” The left has used
the government public education system as a tool to maintain power and
control while the right — fed up with trying to “reform” a lost cause
— has opted out. The right believes an educated people are a free
people; the elite on the left assumes that everyone who isn’t one of
them is either too stupid to become “as educated as they are,” or not
worthy of being offered the opportunity. Colleges and universities, so
completely conquered by leftist professorial elitists and the agenda of
fascism, become hostile to forces that attempt to refocus higher
learning on higher learning, rather than the forwarding of a
political agenda. While reserving portions of the freedoms enumerated
in the Constitution for themselves, the left routinely denies these same
freedoms to ideological opposites, then justifies their action with the
excuse that they’re “only trying to do what is right” — though “right”
is defined only by their standards. - Law enforcement — Despite liberal and fascist attempts to
justify a huge leviathan federal government with unlimited powers to
make laws and enforce them, the framers of the Constitution — as
evidenced in the document itself — feared a powerful central
government. Therefore, in order to limit federal control over the
people, the framers elected to form a weak central government with the
idea that sovereign states, in the formation of a loose confederate
alliance to Washington, would largely handle their own affairs in
matters of making laws and enforcing them. But over the years, as more
fascists became power elites, it became clear that the federal
government was being groomed to become the sole power in the
nation that decided when, where, and to what extent laws would be made
and enforced for all to follow. Bureaucracies grew like weeds — each
endorsed and empowered by successive congresses — to issue rules,
proclamations, regulations and “guidelines” that, as soon as the ink
dried, became akin to real laws, supported and enforced as such by the
vast federal judiciary. The left believes there is no real law
enforcement power beyond Washington, D.C., and that — in the name
of “public safety” — any mechanism of force can be
applied to all areas of the country, just because the left has deemed it
so. State leaders have become cooperative by becoming addicted to the
federal government’s money, which is summarily threatened to be withheld
if an “errant” or “ill-advised” governor or state legislature dares to
question the legitimacy of the federal government’s law enforcement
reach. The right, however, believes in the founding principle of a
small and relatively weak central government, gaining superior judicial
status over the states only in times of war or invasion, or to enforce
specifically enumerated and legitimate interpretations of the
Constitution. - Religion — To the anointed left, there is no “god” or
“power” higher than they are. Fascist leftists have always been a power
unto themselves — the modern-day Babylonian heathens defy God’s Word
and Commandments as if they had been created to be ignored. Whether a
prominent politician refers to Christians as “weak-minded” souls in
search of a crutch, or whether the fascists in government move to remove
all vestiges of religion from our society — under the mistaken guise of
“separation of Church and state” — the right will have none of it. The
right, of course, understands that our souls are on lease from God, and
that ultimately we’ll have to answer to Him — believers or not — when
“our time” comes. - Abortion — Perhaps the coup de grace of the left,
these fascists have been able to convince millions of otherwise
well-intentioned and caring Americans that the right to kill an unborn
baby is not murder because, after all, it’s not really a “baby”
until a mother says so. Furthermore, the left asserts, women ought to
have “the right” to terminate a pregnancy, all the while asserting that
promiscuous men and women do not have to engage in the responsibility of
sex. The left has created many “constitutional rights” where none have
existed, enforced them under the guise of “law,” and propagandized the
new “right” as something “hidden” in the Constitution all along — but
which took their “trained” and anointed minds to discover. It is easy
for any group to claim “the Founders really meant this or that”
in the Constitution when no Founder is alive to contest the assumption.
But the right knows what the Founders meant when they wrote that
document because the right has read their meanings, in their own words.
The left, in the creation of an abortion “right,” knew it was not
founded in constitutional law and had to create an argument based on the
path of least resistance. They knew, for example, that many people
would support the right to have “cost-free” sex and would then accept
their definition of “a woman’s constitutional right to choose,” because
after all, women — like men — are “created equal.” They also knew
that most Americans are constitutionally ignorant and have been
conditioned to accept “the government’s” rulings, regardless of how
offensive they are to common sense and other established laws (like the
one prohibiting murder in all other forms except execution for a
crime). But the right has seen through this constitutional
interpretation for the abomination it truly is, making abortion one of
the most volatile “no compromise” issues of our day.
Whether small groups of people are flirting with rebellion
in small ways, or whether large groups of people are moving away
from the cultural, intellectual, spiritual and governmental decay of the
left, the fact remains that it is happening more often.
Because of the fascist left’s overwhelming success at demonizing the
right, it has become increasingly difficult — if not impossible — to
resolve our differences. The left hates everything the right stands
for, and the right has become so mistrustful of the left’s intentions
that a meaningful dialogue leading to conflict resolution is
unattainable.
But it has not been the right that has remained unreasonable
throughout the debates over the issues. It is the left that refuses to
negotiate, to see the truths, to reach compromises and resolutions to
the nation’s problems that don’t result in eventual total victory. So
pervasive are their arguments that it has caused today’s “conservative,”
right-oriented leaders to acquiesce to the left
in an attempt to “be more electable.” That selling out of principle has
only served to further alienate both sides, as the left sees each
episode as leading to their inevitable victory, and the right becomes
more frustrated and isolated.
With such obvious and irreparable divisions, it may be time to “agree
to disagree” and part company altogether.
There is a place where the right can go, and as it happens,
the weather’s much better there anyway.
