Senate GOP shows statesmanship

By David Limbaugh

Wednesday, the Senate Republicans, by soundly rejecting the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), put the lie to the oft-repeated
charge that there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats.

I could show you countless e-mails and a good number of columns
arguing the Republicans have become so weak and rudderless that they are
no better for this country than Democrats.

They cite example after example illustrating their point. Many,
admittedly, are difficult to refute.

Many commentators, myself included, have been very hard on Senate
Republicans from time to time during the past year, especially during
the impeachment proceedings. But they deserve abundant praise for their
courage in rejecting the ill-conceived CTBT.

The Republicans chose a very important issue to show their mettle. It
is hard to overstate the monumental significance of their action. Once
again, the GOP has demonstrated itself to be the party of peace — peace
through strength.

This was an act of pure statesmanship: doing what is right for the
country, regardless of the political consequences.

Of course, President Clinton predictably accused Republicans of rank
partisanship in killing the treaty. “Never before has a serious treaty
involving nuclear weapons been handled in such a reckless and ultimately
partisan way. This was a political deal, and I hope it will get the
treatment from the American people it richly deserves.”

Read Clinton’s quote again. His words, though intended for
Republicans, apply perfectly to him and his actions. It was the
president who, as usual, was placing politics and his own personal
interests above the national interests.

Think about it. What possible political motive could the Republicans
have had to reject this treaty? The polls show overwhelming public
support for its ratification. And do you think they relish with
anticipation the epithets the president is sure to throw their way: “the
Republicans care more about their party than the safety of their own
children.”

The president, on the other hand, was counting on this treaty as
being a major notch in his foreign policy achievement belt. He has
proven all too many times that he is willing to put his interests above
the national security, so his criticisms ring a bit hollow here.

The ironic and maddening thing is that on every policy issue, Clinton
liberals always seem to start with that smug presumption of moral
superiority. For them, eliminating inanimate explosive objects, whether
guns or nukes, is the only avenue to peace and safety. They have never
quite grasped the utter folly of their position.

How juvenile for them to continue railing that the eradication of our
nuclear superiority will lead to peace. How wrongheaded! How outrageous!

It is time that Republicans went on the attack on this issue. They
need to take their case to the public and demonstrate just how reckless
and irresponsible this treaty was. The truth is that the ratification of
this treaty would have made the United States and its citizens
more vulnerable to nuclear attack.

Countless defense and foreign policy officials and experts from past
administrations vehemently opposed this treaty. They can hardly be
accused of trying to build their already-established legacies.

After cutting through all the legalese and misinformation, the simple
facts about this treaty are:

  • The United States enjoys nuclear superiority in the world
    today;

  • U.S. nuclear superiority is vital for world peace, and especially
    for U.S. security and peace;

  • The CTBT would have permanently prevented the United
    States from field-testing its weapons, thereby severely impeding our
    ability to maintain and modernize our nuclear forces, eroding our
    nuclear deterrent and the confidence of our allies;

  • The CTBT, because of its unverifiability and unenforceability,
    would have encouraged despots and terrorists to develop and augment
    their nuclear arsenals.

  • The CTBT would have been devastating to world peace and U.S.
    security.

There is an added bonus for Republicans in all of this. Ronald
Reagan proved countless times that principled actions ultimately yield
incidental political benefits as well. Whether or not Senate Republicans
realize it, their noble action in standing up to the bullying tactics of
Bill Clinton and protecting our vital security interests will energize
the base of their party and bring many back to the fold.

Kudos to Senator Lott and the GOP.

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book is "Guilty By Reason of Insanity." Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at www.davidlimbaugh.com. Read more of David Limbaugh's articles here.