George: Give Gore the ball back

By David Limbaugh

George Bush has been baiting Bill Clinton to inject himself into the
presidential race, knowing that Clinton’s heightened visibility will
damage Gore. Polls bear this out. I have a better idea. Bush should
encourage Gore to make himself more visible. That would hurt Gore even
more.

Why? Because the dirty little secret of the Gore campaign is that it
has finally discovered that most voters don’t much like Al Gore,
especially when he’s in attack mode. So his handlers are doing
everything they can to keep him in the closet. To have any chance of
winning they have to keep the focus on Bush; keep the ball in his
possession. How do they do that?

First, they minimize Gore’s chances to extemporize — when he’s left
to his own devices and without a script, more likely than not he’ll
descend into embellishment, fabrication and prevarication. Even though
the media is not likely to call him on his lies this late in the game,
his campaign quarterbacks don’t want to take unnecessary chances.

Next, they focus on Bush’s record in Texas through “independent”
groups who can plausibly deny their connection to Gore. With this
strategy, Gore’s campaign tries for two separate twofers. Let me
explain.

By assigning surrogates the task of undercutting Bush’s record and
his proposals, they simultaneously 1) minimize Gore’s personal negatives
and 2) foster the perception that truly objective sources are
criticizing Bush’s record and policies. We see less negative Gore and
more negative Bush.

What about these “independent” surrogates? Are we to believe that the
Rand Corporation just happened to reverse itself on Bush’s Texas
education record two weeks before the election? Are we to believe that
Hillary’s friend, Dr. Irwin Redlener, is acting in his professional
capacity when he writes in the New York Post that Bush’s Texas record
has been harmful to children’s health and education? (Redlener is the
New York pediatrician who, without ever having met Elian Gonzalez,
concluded that his Miami relatives were abusive to him.)

By attacking Bush’s Texas record, they simultaneously undermine 1)
Bush’s record and 2) his credibility, by implying that he has been
distorting his record to make himself look better.

Before you start to feel sorry for Gore because he is the most
unlikable presidential candidate since Richard Nixon, remember that the
feeling’s mutual. He apparently doesn’t like voters either.

Gore, like many of his media cheerleaders, has contempt for the
average person he holds himself out as championing. If he liked,
respected and trusted people would he constantly lie to them about his
record and that of Gov. Bush? Didn’t the media assure us that Gore’s
issues were overwhelmingly popular with the American people? If so, then
why can’t he come clean on his and Bush’s respective positions on taxes,
guns, Social Security, prescription drugs, Medicare, education, charter
schools, partial-birth abortion, the death penalty, health care and
energy?

Gore’s press colleagues are every bit as disdainful of Bush and the
average voter. Salon’s Tod Gitlin writes, “Bush gives ample evidence
that he does not reason.” The International Herald Tribune’s Hope Keller
says that Bush is unfit to be president. The New Republic’s Martin
Peretz asks, “Doesn’t a man who asks for public power and public trust
have a moral obligation to be intelligent about public issues?” The
arrogance drips from their pens.

In the minds of Gore and the media elite, George W. Bush, like Ronald
Reagan, is a simpleton — and so are people who are inclined to vote for
him. In their view, Bush is an imbecile, not because he isn’t eloquent,
but because he’s conservative. Smart people, with the possible
exceptions of Bill Buckley, George Will and Rush Limbaugh, are not
conservative.

A public that would elect such dimwits as Bush and Reagan is not to
be trusted with all the facts. That’s why they tell us only what they
think we can handle. That’s why Hillary directed her health care task
force to meet in private in violation of sunshine laws. That’s why Al
Gore made a secret, illegal deal with Russia to allow her to sell
weapons to Iran.

I believe the wisest course for the Bush campaign is to throw an
interception to get the ball back in Gore’s hands and let him run it in
reverse. Neither he nor his issues can stand the light of day.

David Limbaugh

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book is "Guilty By Reason of Insanity." Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at www.davidlimbaugh.com. Read more of David Limbaugh's articles here.