The weeks since 9-11 have been a time of great heroism and unity. They have also been a time for certain groups and persons to disgrace themselves. The professional America-haters, the Blame America First crowd and an attention-craving ex-president. But now comes a new and, in some ways, even uglier disgrace: the war-profiteers.
Advertisement - story continues below
No, we're not talking about defense contractors – the "military-industrial complex" that, as Ronald Reagan pointed out, turns into the "arsenal of democracy" whenever we have a war. We're talking about something far more intolerable and unaffordable.
TRENDING: Is America having a near-death experience, or is this the end?
The trial lawyers.
Advertisement - story continues below
In our Sept. 28 WorldNetDaily commentary, we asked, "Can the legal leopards change their spots?"
At the time, we had reason to hope that they might. On Wednesday, Sept. 12 – one day after the terrorist attacks – Leo V. Boyle, president of the American Trial Lawyers Association in Washington, D.C., announced that the association had asked its members to declare a moratorium on World Trade Center and Pentagon-related lawsuits.
Advertisement - story continues below
Boyle announced that the ATLA would organize the efforts of members to volunteer their services pro bono on behalf of victims seeking compensation from the Victims' Compensation Fund. Every member of ATLA's Executive Committee volunteered to be a pro bono counsel. The ATLA stated that 100 percent of this money should directly benefit the survivors and families and to help those who were widowed or orphaned by the destruction.
We hoped this was a sincere gesture and not a public relations strategy. Since then, the words of the ATLA have grown progressively more hollow:
Advertisement - story continues below
- The "pro bono" services really meant only the free initial consultation. After that it costs plenty. What about class action suits and contingency fees out of the public eye?
- The 30-day moratorium was essentially meaningless as federal law already provides for a 45-day period following disasters before lawyers can legally besiege affected families. This was designed to keep 60,000 trial lawyers from prematurely soliciting business from grieving families.
- The bailout bill following 9-11 was delayed following a call from Tom Daschle to the White House at 11:30 p.m. the night before the Senate vote. It seems the bill would not pass Congress unless the 25 percent limit on lawyer fees was deleted. We suspect lawyer contributors let him know they wanted a bigger piece of the windfall cash pie. So much for patriotism and compassion if there's a risk of limiting their income.
- William Glaberson's Nov. 11, 2001, article is titled "THE LAWSUIT – Lawyer Math in Sept. 11 Deaths Shows Varying Values for a Life." Glaberson writes "The lawyers are asking uncomfortable questions. How much did the dead man make? Was the death fast or slow? Were the passengers terrorized by seeing flight attendants stabbed? How hot was the fire? ... Intangible things, like the suffering before an inescapable death, are given a price tag."
And then there are the politically-motivated suits. As WorldNetDaily commentator Debbie Schlussel cautioned on Nov. 15, we'd better expect "a whole new litigation racket to clog the courts" – suits organized by radical Islamists. Better not say anything insensitive about the people who would love to kill you. You might get sued.
Donna Knifsend, Esq., CEO of Lawsuit Prevention and Management and an active member of Orange County Citizens Against Law Suit Abuse is embarrassed by the behavior of her peers. Knifsend notes that in a recent survey 76 percent of lawyers do not want their children to grow up to be lawyers. Many are leaving to take lower-paying jobs that are more respectable. Maybe there's a reason they get no respect!
Let us make it very clear that we are not against all lawsuits – we acknowledge that some are legitimate and necessary.
But sadly, we must conclude that the legal leopards didn't change their spots after all. When we needed them most to be part of the solution to our national survival, they once again chose to be part of the problem.
However, there may be hope for us, if not for them. Bill O'Reilly has been riding herd on the charities that raised money for the 9-11 victims, compelling them to deliver as promised. Would that Mr. O'Reilly and lots of others in the media perform a similar service regarding the ATLA – whatever they do, however much they make, reveal and publicize to the max.
Let's not allow America to be hurt by these ugly war-profiteers.