Ever since George W. Bush has been elected president, I have had one question that has echoed in my mind, “What is the ante for the son to be elected president, when the father was replaced for his non-compliance with the mandates of the United Nations Earth Summit in 1992?”
My answer came when the current President Bush announced several weeks ago that he was going to attend the Financing for Development Conference in Monterrey, Mexico. While a U.N. spokesman has told me that the world is not yet ready for a specific global tax, to those who understand the global agenda, a number of different forms of transfer of wealth will be discussed.
On the eve of another historic global conference – which will alter how governments are run by setting up a framework for various forms of “global taxation” – it is necessary to go back in time to understand how we got where we are.
In Rio, the United Nations changed the course of history and religion when they introduced the radical environmental agenda called “Agenda 21” – which basically says that man no longer has dominance over the earth, but earth has dominance over man. Instead of communism being the enemy of the brave and free, the environment was substituted. One of the chief concerns in 1992 was, “Who will pay for the first comprehensive attempt to repair environmental damaged caused by industrialization?”
The charge by environmentalists that the earth has been damaged by development was only part of the very radical agenda. Not only were there several treaties which supporters wanted signed and ratified – and which included climate warming, biological diversity and desertification – but also there were demands on the rich countries of the North to pay for the environmental degradation in the poor countries of the South.
It was estimated then that the cost to meet the goals set forth in the 200-page “Agenda 21” document would run about $125 billion a year. In order to reach this goal, $70 billion would have to come from an increase in development assistance, which was running $55 billion a year in aid to developing countries. It was agreed that seven-tenths of 1 percent of total economic output for every country would be set aside to pay for environmentally sound projects.
A month before the summit, President George H. W. Bush threatened to boycott in order to win concessions from most of the world’s nations on global warming – which included eliminating language that would have required the U.S. to cap its emissions of carbon dioxide by 2000 at 1990 levels.
Then to mess up well-laid plans by the U.N. and environmentalists, the Bush administration announced that it would not sign the Biological Diversity Treaty because it would limit biotechnological development in the United States and could infringe on American patent protection for biological inventions. It was also concerned with how money for Third World countries would be disbursed, because the treaty surrendered control over World Bank environmental funds to an undefined group of nations signing the treaty. Lastly, Mr. Bush felt that because of U.S. budget restrictions, we could not afford to come up with the funds for the multi-billion dollar aid packages being offered in Rio by Japan and the European countries.
You know when a sitting president looks at his watch during a very important presidential debate that the handwriting is on the wall. The first President Bush lost to a man who basically did what he would not. President Clinton should be awarded the Order of Stalin for all of his environmental and global achievements. Interestingly enough, another Bush replaced him.
I can’t help but wonder if George W. Bush is providing redemption for the political and environmental sins of his father. One week before President George W. attends the U.N./International Monetary Fund/World Bank/World Trade Organization-sponsored Financing for Development Conference in Monterrey, Mexico, he addressed the World Bank where he pledged to increase U.S. Overseas Development Assistance by $5 billion for the next three years. This is above and beyond existing aid requested.
Furthermore, he pre-empted any thunder from other world leaders by announcing that these monies would go into a “New Millennium Challenge Account,” which would be used to meet the goals described in the U.N. Millennium Declaration. While President George H. W. did not offer any apologies for his actions not to support the Earth Summit – nor was it even necessary, it is the son who goes to his first major U.N. mega conference with agreement and proposals to further the international infrastructure of world government enhanced by the 1992 foundational meeting.
The current President Bush is expanding and supporting a global governmental agenda of “Universal Jurisdiction,” where the world is one and if someone is hurting, cold or hungry in another part of the world, it is our responsibility to provide for him.
Mr. Bush stated in his speech that terrorism is a result of the “Failed State.” Let me put it this way: You live at 102 South Main Street. You have your finances under control. You have a reasonable mortgage balance with a good amount of equity. Your children are clean, neat and respectful. You feed them and nourish them and provide them with values and morals by which to live. You have money in the bank and you keep your house in respectable order. Your neighbor at 104 South Main Street is in need. The house is neglected, the lawn is a mess and the children run around dirty, unkempt and hungry.
What the doctrines of Universal Jurisdiction and Failed States basically say is that you should mortgage your house to clean up your neighbor’s house.
Related offer:
The May edition of WND’s WorldNet Magazine, now called Whistleblower, titled “GLOBAL LOAN SHARKS: How the IMF and World Bank debase nations, steal wealth and undermine sovereignty,” exposes the multinational institutions’ real agenda perhaps like never before.
Joan Veon has done extensive research on the United Nations and their agenda and has attended dozens of U.N. conferences.