Shaggy dog story

By WND Staff

The bloodhounds were “barking and howling and straining at their leashes.”
That was the sensational lead to a Newsweek story that has become one of the
particulars in the public “indictment” of Dr. Steven Hatfill for last fall’s
unsolved anthrax killings.

Newsweek said that the FBI took bloodhounds to
Hatfill’s Maryland apartment in early August. It claims a law enforcement
official told them, “They went crazy.” Not surprisingly, Newsweek’s story
was picked up and replayed as far away as Qatar. But is the story accurate?

Newsweek reported that the bloodhounds matched scent lifted from the anthrax letters to Hatfill. Newsweek said that the dogs also “reacted” at his
girlfriend’s apartment and a Denny’s restaurant in Louisiana.

reporters told Accuracy in Media that the FBI had employed a “new technology” to collect scent that involves “vacuuming” it onto a sterile gauze pad directly from
the letters. The FBI told the magazine that the Bureau does not have its own
dogs and had flown in bloodhounds for use by the Washington Field Office.

Hatfill says that Newsweek’s description of the dog’s visit to his apartment
is inaccurate. He says that the Bureau took him to an empty apartment in his
complex and directed him to one of three chairs. A bloodhound was brought in
and Hatfill, a dog lover, scratched the dog’s ears. When the dog began to
return the affection, an agent started screaming, “the dog is reacting, the
dog is reacting!” Also, a Baltimore Sun reporter determined that none of the
twelve Denny’s in Louisiana had been visited by the FBI and bloodhounds.

AIM contacted a national training coordinator of the Law Enforcement
Bloodhounds Association, a police officer with 15 years of
experience handling bloodhounds, about Newsweek’s story. He and his dog form
one of 15 teams, all from the law enforcement community in the part of
Maryland that includes Hatfill’s apartment. Among this group is a team on
the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team call list that participated in the search for
suspected Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph. None were called upon by the FBI in
this case, and they, too, have been wondering whose dogs were used.

training coordinator confirmed that the FBI doesn’t have its own dogs, never
uses volunteers, and always contracts with local law enforcement dog teams
in such cases.

Asked about the “new technology,” the officer laughed and said that the
reference was to a “scent machine,” probably the STU-100, invented by
William Tolhurst and Larry Harris, two well-known dog handlers and experts
on the use of bloodhounds in police matters. Mr. Tolhurst, who lives in
upstate New York, told AIM that it is “very possible” that his STU-100 was
used and his website does list the FBI’s Washington Field Office as one of
his customers. Tolhurst and Harris have sold their $600 STU-100s to local
police forces, particularly in California where Mr. Harris is based.

Mr. Tolhurst believes that scent, derived from oils transferred from a person’s skin to a particular article like envelopes, would linger after
decontamination. He acknowledged that his device was somewhat controversial,
but compared skepticism about its effectiveness to that surrounding earlier
tools like the polygraph. He declined to offer any further details citing
the “ongoing investigation.”

AIM has learned that the STU-100 was the “new technology” and that Mr.
Harris and his dogs were flown in by the Bureau for the Hatfill search. AIM
also learned that both the STU-100 and Mr. Harris are very controversial in
the world of police bloodhound handlers.

Officer Jerry Nichols, LEBA president, told AIM that both LEBA and the National Police Bloodhound Association have declined to endorse the STU-100. Officer Nichols was very critical of the methodology used by the FBI and Harris in the Hatfill case, saying it was “badly flawed.” Too many people handled the letters, it’s not certain that the scent would survive the decontamination process and a judge threw out a case involving Mr. Harris that was very similar to this.
In fact, police handlers were so offended by Mr. Harris’ technique in that
case, one flew to California from Maryland to testify for the defense.

At first glance, this looks like just another FBI fiasco. But when did
Newsweek magazine become an arm of the Justice Department? It doesn’t appear
to have challenged the shaggy dog story it was fed by the FBI and repeated
it verbatim.

Never mind that Dr. Hatfill’s career and personal reputation
were at stake, Newsweek got a sensational scoop.

Notra Trulock is the associate editor of Accuracy in Media‘s AIM Report. He is a former director of intelligence at the U.S. Department of Energy.