U.S. official: Saudi repression not ‘severe’

By Art Moore

The U.S. State Department today named China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Burma and Sudan as “countries of particular concern” due to ongoing, “egregious” violations of religious freedom, a designation that requires a policy response within 90 days.

For the third straight year, however, it omitted Saudi Arabia, considered by many human-rights analysts to be among the world’s most repressive nations.

“Saudi Arabia is very close to meeting the threshold for designation,” State Department spokesman Jeffrey Jamison told WorldNetDaily. “But at this point, the determination is that the situation remains as it has been in previous years.”

That situation in Saudi Arabia, according to the State Department’s own reckoning, is one in which “religious freedom does not exist,” in contrast to China, for example, which allows various religious bodies to worship under state control.

Saudi Arabia forbids all public expression of religion, except for its strict Wahhabi interpretation of Islam. No church buildings are allowed, and religious police have cracked down at times on worship in private homes. Saudis are forbidden by law from converting to another religion. Some foreign Christians have been imprisoned in squalid conditions and tortured, and some have been beheaded.

Jamison admitted that a country’s situation does not have to worsen before it is designated a “country of particular concern,” but said that in Saudi Arabia “the types of violations that do occur have been determined not to be particularly severe.”

How much worse can it get than “religious freedom does not exist”? asked Anne Johnson, spokesperson for the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, or USCIRF, the independent panel established by Congress in 1998 to promote religious freedom as a U.S. policy goal. Each year, the commission recommends the countries it believes should be designated by the Secretary of State as the worst violators.

Deference to rigid demands

The USCIRF said it was “deeply disappointed” that, along with Saudi Arabia, Secretary of State Colin Powell did not designate Laos, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, India, and Vietnam, as the commission recommended last September.

“It doesn’t mean we stop advocating for religious freedom in Saudi Arabia,” Jamison said. “CPC designation can be made at any time. It’s a matter of reviewing the situation for religious freedom, the character of the violations and how we determine progress can best be made in the country.”

But USCIRF commissioner Nina Shea pointed out that diplomatic considerations come into play not with the designation, but the choice of policy actions, which range in severity from a demarche to economic sanctions.

Leaving Saudi Arabia off the list, she said, is “part of a larger pattern to always show deference to the rigid demands of Saudi Arabia, whether it’s making our military women in Saudi Arabia conform to the strict Wahhabi dress, or shutting down Christian worship services on U.S. Embassy grounds for embassy employees, or banning women air traffic controllers in the flight path of the Saudi crown prince visiting the president in Crawford, Texas.”

“In each of this instances, it’s the same absurd deference to Wahhabi codes of behavior,” said Shea, director of the Center for Religious Freedom at Freedom House in Washington, D.C.

Critics say officials fear the U.S. might jeopardize its tenuous relationship with Riyadh, which recently agreed to allow the use of its air bases for a possible war with Iraq.

The countries chosen this year were the same as last year’s group. Commission chair Felice Gaer chastised the State Department for a pattern of taking no additional policy action against the designated counties, but “explicitly relying instead on pre-existing sanctions simply to meet requirements under the law.”

“While this may be technically correct under the statute, it is indefensible as a matter of policy,” said Gaer.

Shea said that leaving countries such as Saudi Arabia off the list “works to undermine the credibility of the process,” but still believes that the list serves a purpose.

“In one sense, it’s been very effective because by requiring the list, a news cycle has been created, and everyone debates which countries should be in the list, and there is scrutiny,” she said.

Overall, said Shea, the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 has been valuable.

“It’s very important that there is this watchdog organization established under the act, the commission, to make a determination that is independent of political concerns,” she continued. “I think the State Department has done some good things. It’s reporting on religious freedom is very good, even on Saudi Arabia, where it’s quite candid about stating there is no religious freedom in law or in practice in Saudi Arabia.”

The USCIRF issued the following summaries of religious freedom in countries it recommended to the State Department as “countries of particular concern.”

Burma: The Burmese government persists in exercising strict control over all religious activities and imposing severe restrictions on certain religious practices. Members of the Burmese military have reportedly killed members of religious minorities or instigated violence by the Buddhist majority against them. Police and military personnel have failed to protect religious minorities during periods of violence. The plight of religious minorities in Burma is made worse by the widespread social tensions encouraged by the regime between the Buddhist majority and the Christian and Muslim minorities there. Other severe violations of religious freedom have included forcible conscription of religious minorities as military porters and death for those who refuse.

China: The Chinese government continues to confine, torture, imprison, and subject individuals to other forms of ill treatment on account of their religion or belief, including Protestant Christians, Roman Catholics, Tibetan Buddhists, Uighur Muslims, and others, such as members of Falun Gong, that the government has labeled “evil cults.” In fact, in the past year, official respect for religious freedom in China has diminished. Chinese government officials have continued to claim the right to control, monitor, and restrain religious practice in that country. As part of China’s crackdown on religious and spiritual believers, individuals have been charged with, or detained under suspicion of, offenses that essentially penalize them for manifesting freedoms of religion or belief, speech, association, or assembly. In addition, several prominent religious leaders have been detained, often on reportedly dubious criminal charges, such as rape and other sexual violence, or financial crimes. The crackdown against religious believers was authorized at the highest levels of the government, according to reportedly official documents obtained by human rights non-governmental organizations.

India: In 2002, at least 1,000 Muslims were killed and more than 100,000 forced to flee their homes as a result of violence by Hindu mobs in Gujarat State after 58 Hindus were killed on a train in Godhra. Christians, too, were victims in Gujarat when many churches were destroyed. The state government has failed to hold key violators accountable for these abuses.

Iran: The government of Iran engages in or tolerates systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom, including prolonged detention and executions based primarily or entirely upon the religion of the victims. Minority religious groups that are not officially recognized by the state and those perceived to be attempting to convert Muslims suffer particular repression. Civil and human rights apply on the basis of one’s religious affiliation, and only to those groups officially recognized by the government as legitimate.

Iraq: For decades, the government of Iraq has conducted a brutal campaign of murder, summary execution, arbitrary arrest, and protracted detention against the religious leaders and followers of the majority Shi’a Muslim population. Shi’a Muslims also continue to face harassment, destruction and desecration of property, and decimation of leadership. The Iraqi government has also sought to undermine the identity of minority Christian (Assyrian and Chaldean) and Yazidi groups, and members of these groups have faced repression, forced relocation, and denial of political rights.

Laos: Government officials in Laos continue to arrest, detain, and imprison members of minority religions on account of their faith. In some instances, officials attempted to force Christians to renounce their faith. A Commission delegation visited Laos in February 2002.

North Korea: Religious freedom remains non-existent in North Korea, where the government has a policy of actively discriminating against religious believers. The North Korean state severely represses public and private religious activities. The commission has received reports that officials have arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and sometimes executed North Korean citizens who were found to have ties with overseas Christian evangelical groups operating across the border in China, as well as those who engaged in such unauthorized religious activities as public religious expression and persuasion.

Pakistan: In 2002, there has been an upsurge in attacks targeting Pakistan’s Christian minority and the Government has failed adequately to protect religious minorities from sectarian violence. Discriminatory religious legislation, including the blasphemy and anti-Ahmadi laws, helps create an atmosphere of religious intolerance. Blasphemy charges, often false, result in lengthy detention and sometimes violence, including fatal attacks, against religious minority members as well as Muslims. American journalist Daniel Pearl was forced to “confess” his religion as Jewish before being beheaded on a training video by Islamic extremists.

Saudi Arabia: As noted in past years by the State Department, religious freedom “does not exist” in Saudi Arabia. The government vigorously prohibits all forms of public religious expression other than the government’s interpretation and presentation of Sunni Islam. Last year, numerous foreign Christian workers were detained, arrested, tortured, and subsequently deported. Shi’a clerics and religious scholars are detained and imprisoned for their religious views, which differ from those of the government. Other severe violations include torture and cruel and degrading treatment or punishment; prolonged detention without charges; and flagrant denials of the right to liberty and security of the person, including coercive measures directed against women and the extended jurisdiction of the religious police, who exercise their vague powers in ways that violate others’ religious freedom.

Sudan: The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom has identified Sudan as the world’s most violent abuser of the right to freedom of religion and belief. In the commission’s view, the Sudanese government has committed genocidal atrocities against civilian populations in the South and in the Nuba Mountains. Religious conflict is a major factor in Sudan’s ongoing and prolonged civil war. In the context of the civil war, government and allied forces continue to commit egregious human rights abuses, such as forced starvation as part of the denial of international humanitarian assistance, abduction and enslavement of women and children, the forcible displacement of civilian populations (e.g., from oil-producing regions), and aerial bombardment of civilians, including church property, and of humanitarian facilities.

Turkmenistan: The government severely restricts religious activity other than by the government-sanctioned Sunni Muslim Board and the Russian Orthodox Church. Members of unrecognized religious communities – including Baha’is, Baptists, Hare Krishnas, Jehovah’s Witnesses, independent Muslims, Pentecostals, and Seventh-day Adventists – have reportedly been arrested and detained with allegations of torture and other ill-treatment, imprisoned, deported, harassed, and fined; they have had their services disrupted, congregations dispersed, religious literature confiscated, and places of worship destroyed.”

Vietnam: The government continues repressive policies toward all religions and their followers. A Commission delegation that visited Vietnam in March 2002 found that religious dissidents remain under house arrest or are imprisoned, including Father Thaddeus Nguyen Van Ly, who was detained after submitting testimony to the Commission in 2001. In addition, government officials continue to suppress organized religious activities and to harass leaders and followers of unregistered religious organizations, as well as clergy members of officially recognized religious groups.

Related stories:

U.S. gives Saudi persecution a pass

Christians claim torture by Saudis

Saudis delay release of Christians


Related special offer:

Pat Roush’s new book, “At Any Price” is here! True story of a woman’s struggle to free Americans captive in Saudi Arabia.

Art Moore

Art Moore, co-author of the best-selling book "See Something, Say Nothing," entered the media world as a PR assistant for the Seattle Mariners and a correspondent covering pro and college sports for Associated Press Radio. He reported for a Chicago-area daily newspaper and was senior news writer for Christianity Today magazine and an editor for Worldwide Newsroom before joining WND shortly after 9/11. He earned a master's degree in communications from Wheaton College. Read more of Art Moore's articles here.