40 years after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, theories about who was responsible for his death continue unabated, reflecting polls showing most Americans don’t believe the official version. One website lists no less than 36 different theories that have floated around over the past four decades. A new release by WND Books, however, based on recently declassified federal documents, material supplied by the KGB, information from the Bonano crime family, documents obtained from a French court and the only interview done with a French witness previously only debriefed by the FBI and CIA, promises to cut through the confusion and completely change the debate.
In “Triangle of Death,” co-authors Brad O’Leary and L.E. Seymour untangle for readers a seemingly outrageous web that becomes increasingly convincing with each corroborated detail. They build a case that leads to a stunning, but convincing conclusion: President John F. Kennedy was killed Nov. 22, 1963, as the result of a massive conspiracy between the CIA-installed government of South Vietnam, the French global heroin syndicate and the New Orleans Mafia. In the first of two excerpts published exclusively by WorldNetDaily, the authors revealed “The French Assassin.” In today’s excerpt it’s “Brother Bobby’s Cover-up.”
We know that Bobby Kennedy used the power of his office to cover up a great many things during his short-lived career, and all of these cover-ups were directly related to his brother, the president. We know that he covered up the chain of custody of Kennedy’s evidence-vital brain and autopsy photographs, and we know that he went out of his way to conceal his and his brother’s direct involvement with post-Bay-of-Pigs plans to overthrow and assassinate Fidel Castro, all to protect the Kennedy family name, and especially the president’s.
And now it seems all too clear that we have yet another Bobby Kennedy cover-up. Given the serious import of an anti-Kennedy terrorist present in Dallas on the day of the assassination and then the bizarre order to deport him shortly thereafter, where could such an order have come from? Who would have the sheer clout to order such an obvious violation of law-enforcement protocol?
Only the man at the very top.
To support this allegation, we know that INS operatives received high priority orders from Washington to intercept a French national in Dallas shortly after Kennedy’s murder. Again, there’s only one person in the Justice Department would have the power to see that such an unorthodox instruction were carried out.
That said, isn’t it also odd that immediately after Kennedy’s funeral, French President de Gaulle began spouting to the newspapers and to advisers that he believed Kennedy was killed as the result of a conspiracy on the part of the Dallas Police Department? It’s true, and it’s clearly cited in an FBI document that wasn’t declassified until 1993.
This seems curiously inappropriate if not downright uncouth.
During the immediate aftermath of a tragic event which shocked the world, and when most other chiefs of state were pouring in their condolences to the United States government and its people, Charles de Gaulle – a longtime friend and ally – was going out of his way to stamp a ludicrous smear on President Kennedy’s death by perpetuating this crass and unfounded rumor.
It almost seems as if de Gaulle were scrambling for a means of distraction at the precise moment when U.S. analytical bodies would be trying to mount a critical focus on the massive task of investigating the president’s death.
Why would de Gaulle do this?
Furthermore, why would Bobby Kennedy order a potential assassin of his brother deported instead of arrested?
These two facts present some absolutely incredible assaults on logic unless one considers a very logical clandestine motive which, we suggest, leads back to Saigon and Diem’s elite Presidential Palace.
As much as Bobby Kennedy loved and looked up to his brother, after November 22, 1963, Kennedy was dead, and there was no bringing him back. As Attorney General, his ultimate task was to see to the absolute protection of the president via his Secret Service.
After this colossal failure, Bobby had nothing left to protect except his brother’s name in the history books, his family’s name, and his own future political hopes. And this was a job he wouldn’t screw up. Bobby knew that a comprehensive federal investigation of his brother’s death would almost certainly lead to facts that might blemish the Kennedy legacy. Further investigation might disclose that Sam Giancana, at the reported request of Jack’s father Joe, had engineered the Illinois voting fraud that had won Kennedy the 1960 presidential election.
No, the American public probably wouldn’t take that information very well, nor would they take too kindly to learning that their beloved president had pursued secret efforts to overthrow and kill Fidel Castro before and after the Bay of Pigs Invasion and had many more on the drawing board.5 More to the point, how well would the American people take it if they ever learned that Kennedy had encouraged and aided a coup d’etat that had resulted in the assassination of South Vietnam’s president, a U.S. ally?
Indeed, if the U.S. voters in mid-’60s America ever found out that the man they elected president was on one hand claiming to fight the threat of communism by sending half a billion U.S. tax dollars per year (plus 15,000 men) to support the Diem government but on the other hand supporting a secret military conspiracy to destroy Diem, those voters would probably neither be inclined to reelect Kennedy in 1964 nor to vote for Bobby Kennedy in 1968.
With Kennedy in his grave, the logical family consensus would have to be Let’s cut our losses and preserve what we have left.
This could certainly explain why a French terrorist sniper was quickly and secretly flown out of Dallas two days after the assassination, especially if that man was Michael Mertz. Isn’t it highly likely that, after the fact, the French Secret Service realized their colossal oversight and then admitted to de Gaulle, Hey, we’ve got a big problem here. It turns out that one of the men who killed Kennedy was a Marseille heroin distributor who also helped us bust the OAS and save your life? This could also explain de Gaulle’s wholly bizarre quick-jump to blaming the Dallas Police Department.
If information such as this had been revealed to the world – and especially to America – in 1963 or 1964, the public reaction would surely have been catastrophic. It would not only destroy any further political endeavors for Bobby Kennedy, it would destroy the public’s perception of the Kennedy family in general, and the iconic memory of the president in particular. It would also destroy U.S. trust and credibility abroad, and forever stamp the United States as a government that is willing to overthrow and murder chiefs of state who don’t go along with U.S. policy demands.
Excerpted by permission of WND Books, a division of Thomas Nelson, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
